User talk:WhosAsking

Welcome!

Hello WhosAsking, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:39, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Triangle arrow on I-95

Can you make the background of your triangle-arrow image transparent so that a blue square doesn't surround the arrow? Jkatzen 19:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is transparent. If you have a background around the triangle, it must be because of your SVG renderer.--WhosAsking 22:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first off, Wikipedia converts SVGs to PNGs for display, so any SVG viewer I have is irrelevant. Second, I'm using MSIE, the most popular browser in the world (regardless of your preference), and I am relying, I believe (?) only on what is natively available in the browser. Jkatzen 06:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would explain it. IE below v6 doesn't handle PNGs (particularly transparent PNGs) that well. I use Firefox and Opera, and both handle it smoothly. --WhosAsking 10:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm using v6.0.2900, and it's not transparent. IE usually handles one-color-transparency PNGs properly, but unfortunately (this sucks), it has difficulty with alpha-channel transparency (using varying degrees of transparency on anti-aliasing). It might make sense for you convert it to a PNG or GIF with only one transparent color so that the majority of users can see it as you intend instead of letting Wikipedia convert it to a PNG with alpha-channel transparency. Jkatzen 22:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I-35 - redundant text?

I just saw your last edit on Interstate 35, and it feels redundant. See the emphasized text in this excerpt:

"In two stretches, the highway splits into Interstate 35E (Dallas and St. Paul) and Interstate 35W (Fort Worth and Minneapolis). In both cases, the exit numbers follow I-35E, but everything else gives the two routes equal status. The unique situation occurs because, in both cases, the two branches serve twin cities and are thus equally important and in need of equal distinctions."

I don't see anything added by the last section that isn't given by the first. Do you agree?

Though really, what I'd like to find for this article is a source saying that neither city in one/both pair wanted to give up its mainline number for a 3di. C.Fred 01:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Thanks for your contributions to Interstate articles... I just thought I'd give a few pointers. Because of space, typically only Interstates go into the junctions list (on the short Interstates you have more flexibility). Also, what are the arrows for?

You can learn about the project at WP:IH.

--Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made them as a shortcut to indicate directions. This is most useful for junctions only available in one direction or when I had to split a shared alignment because it crosses another major junction (which has to go in between). Take the Capital beltway. From the south, I-95 merges into the beltway at Exit 57, but it crosses into Maryland and makes several important junctions (I-295, US 50, etc.) before finally alighting at Exit 29. Perhaps we need a better idea for lengthy shared alignments.

I don't mind your edits. I was going for comprehensiveness when I see the idea was to be concise.

--WhosAsking 10:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Named interchanges

At http://www.roadfan.com/mtrfaq.html there is a huge list (you'll have to search for it). Of course you will need to cite it as a source unless you find other ones. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

routeboxes

Thanks for your work on the routeboxes... in the future could you use <td align=right> rather than the |right| attribute on the image? It makes the table a little more compact... thanks. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:00, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that and use that convention for the most part now. But you can't really use it when you have more than two shields (like when describing the Bruckner Interchange--they start crowding) or your route name is inescapably more than a line long (things like the Korean War Veterans Parkway--the shield ends up on the bottom and looks tacky). It's the only time I use the |right| style for shields these days. --WhosAsking 05:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate shields

Works fine on my end - there were some issues earlier. If you can't get it working append "?action=purge" to the end of the URL and/or hard refresh. As for Business Interstates, I'll get to those eventually. U.S. Routes too. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 07:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strange - I use K-Meleon and it's working fine. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 08:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transportation in NYC

Hello WhosAsking - I notice you've done work on the the Transportation in New York City article. It's really come along and has been nominated to be a US Collaboration of the Week. You shold vote for it. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/WP:USCOTW Wv235

US Collaboration of the week

You have voted for Transportation in New York City on WP:USCOTW. It was selected to be this week's winner. You are invited to contribute to improve Transportation in New York City in any way you can. Cmadler 13:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NYS shields

I left a message on your Commons talk page, and on WP:NYSR, about problems I had trying to create new shields with Illustrator. Firefox only lets me download the templates as .pngs, so basically (as I understand it), all the .SVG info is lost and I can't edit the text.

I have tried resaving the template as an .ai and then turning the finished product into an .SVG. That works fine except that it seems to substitute the font.

I am thinking of creating my own template from scratch as an .ai to make it easier to save as an .SVG (that has worked for me in the past) but I wondered if you had any suggestions. Daniel Case 18:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's how it works. First, don't click on the image itself. Wikimedia automatically renders SVGs into PNGs, thus what you're encountering. Instead, click the filename hyperlink directly below the picture. This should enable you to retrieve the actual SVG file, which you should be able to import into Illustrator. --WhosAsking 19:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Florida shields

Do you have the specs for the shields like Image:FL Route 826 Shield.svg? I'm thinking of mass-producing SVGs for them, but I can't find the specs online, even though the toll ones are online. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 13:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind - I found it. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 00:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toll shields look nice!

Your Florida SR and toll shields look nice - keep up the good work! Just a few things to keep in mind: the Florida outline is black on MDX TOLL shields; the word TOLL is omitted on all stretches of MDX expressways in which there are no collection/SunPass facilities in front of the driver, such as north of SR 990 on northbound SR 874 (and also the entire length of SR 878, which is free but has the TOLL-less toll shield); and SR 924 has both a toll shield (Gratigny Parkway) and a FDOT shield (east of SR 9). MDX is using a unique mileage marker design, too - have you seen it? 147.70.242.39 22:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of FL 924--it's why I made two shields--one for the free section, one for the toll section. Thanks for the hint on the MDX toll shields, though. I used to spend time in Orlando, so I'm more familiar with those shields (which use the red state outline). Looks like we'll need to make a third template: for the curved shield without the TOLL on top for any MDX-maintained free road. --WhosAsking 22:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about red vs. black. I was just at the new interchange of SR 429 and Western Way (built by the Turnpike) the other day, and there are both red and black state outlines on brand new shields. As for the font, that part is specified in the specs, but of course signs often don't follow them exactly. --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 09:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So for the "free" shields, it's just a removal of the TOLL? Are these all the roads that use them? --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 09:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

State Road 924 has all three shields used on the road. --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 12:01, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say for any other authority, but those are the five (the still-under-construction connector between SR 836 and SR 112 remains to be seen regarding its designation - overhead signs are already up on the southbound lanes! The more likely scenario would be to extend the SR 112 designation to SR 836, but FDOT District 6 has been known to pull a few surprises around here (like the "trailblazer signs to nowhere"), and we probably won't be sure for at least two more years. Interesting thing abour SR 924: it has an END sign, but it's three miles from the actual eastern end of the State Road, thanks to MDX (the only non-expressway FDOT END sign in Miami-Dade county that I know of is at the southern end of Krome Avenue, SR 997). 147.70.242.39 00:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think I should add the "normal" shield to SR 878 too, as that is what is used on guide signs? Or has the Expressway Authority begun using the "free" shields on guide signs? --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 17:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The newer guide signs show the "toll signs" as do the street level trailblazers - usually reflecting direction to/from toll collecting facilities, but there are still a good number of the FDOT shields on the guide signs left. Oh, this may change in the next few years if MDX does what it proposes to do - the latest version of open road tolling involving loops in the pavement would also convert SR 878 into a toll road, and, when/if that happens, all the MDX shields will be TOLL shields (the SR 836 extension being built now is designed with open road tolling in mind - it will have no coin collecting facilities at all, just SunPass). 147.70.242.39 00:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Orlando uses the toll shields, as they replaced symbols (like a bee for the Bee Line and an orange for the East-West). The one exception is the Turnpike part of the Bee Line, where a few older signs still have the normal SR 528 shield. --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 23:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of Ontario provincial highways#Shields

Copy of my reply to your query on the subj talk page:

A few treatments are possible. It could be declared fair use as a logo. You could also check the declarations made for road sign images such as Image:Florida A1A.svg or Image:Vermont 9.svg. There is at least one Ontario sign image, Image:The King's Highway 11 Ontario (Sign).png. Also note the history of Ontario sign designs in [1]. Have fun... Dl2000 01:26, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On further search, the logo/PNG approach was taken for these examples in Alberta (Image:AB crowsnest.png) and Quebec (

). Dl2000 01:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hope the above helps... Dl2000 22:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have already made a few determinations. First, I am assuming that the overall design of the Kings Highway signs are now public domain, seeing as that they were introduced back in the 1930's (Crown Copyright in Ontario seems to follow the Canadian standard of 50 years, which have long passed). Still, to be safe, I'll keep them as PNGs in case their licensing needs to change in future.

I am also working on Manitoba shields. I am giving them the Logo treatment because they do contain an actual logo and wordmark upon them. —WhosAsking 04:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ballistic gelatin

I noticed you added a couple of more Mythbusters experiments to the ballistic gelatin page. Could you take a quick look at http://kwc.org/mythbusters/ and stick links to the episodes in question in the references section? Since they're both electricity related you might stick them on the same line as "The third rail" experiment. scot 13:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia State Highway Route shields

Hello, I am working with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Virginia Highways, and I am wondering if you would be able to make us some route shields from the PNG files we already have. I noticed that you created some shields a while back, but I would like to standardize the naming of the shield files for the purpose of using them in a route box. Is it possible to convert png to svg? If not, then I am considering just using png since that is the easiest for me to create. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 02:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario shields

The Ontario shields do indeed look great. Just wondering if you have a timeline as to when the remaining 400-series shields will be uploaded? They would be a great addition to the infoboxes that I am adding to the articles, makes them look much cleaner. Thanks. Snickerdo 16:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No rush dude, all the best. Snickerdo 11:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia highways

Please follow WP:USSH when linking to state highways. Thank you. --NE2 01:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Gallery at Military Circle

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Gallery at Military Circle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Cruftbane 10:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TPIR GasMoney.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TPIR GasMoney.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TPIR OneWrongPrice.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TPIR OneWrongPrice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

project tagging

Can you do the project a simple favor? Can you create the talk page with the {{USRD}} tag for Guam highways when you create the article? That way the articles will show up in our tracking categories. As well, the cartography gods in the project will know to create maps, when they get around to finding good Guam sources. Imzadi 1979 → 00:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The code for the infobox has been changed. Since Guam is a US territory, use |state=GU |type=GU If you have any questions, let me know. Imzadi 1979 → 19:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 AFL Grand Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2004 AFL Grand Final may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Simon Black]] was convicted and suspended a total of three matches for two striking incidents.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://footystats.freeservers.com/Archive/Tribunal2004.html|title=Tribunal 2004|site=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2004 AFL Grand Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ten Cent Beer Night, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the The finger page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion on Home/Away team in cricket tour squad box

Hello, WhosAsking. You have new messages at Talk:Australian cricket team in England and Ireland in 2015.
Message added 06:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Password fatigue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social engineering. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bacardi cocktail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed Drinks

Hi. I've noted that you've gone around the IBA recipes, among others, and changing quite a few of them to 'mixed drink'. Considering that, technically, any and all cocktails and drinks are mixed, as long as they're not something like <BOOZE> on the rocks, what is your criteria?85.229.56.88 (talk) 21:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The primary condition, which I recall was noted in the infobox at some point, is that for it to be a cocktail it must be majority spirits. If most of the drink is spirits, then it's a cocktail. OTOH, something like a Bloody Mary is mostly juice and other stuff, spirits are in the minority. —WhosAsking (talk) 13:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, WhosAsking. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Parkways on Long Island

Template:Parkways on Long Island has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rs chen 7754 21:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, WhosAsking. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pitch invasion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, WhosAsking. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]