User talk:Whoopthereitis12

Welcome!

Hello, Whoopthereitis12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Yann (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, Whoopthereitis12, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Wildest Dreams (Taylor Swift song) (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 1989 (Taylor Swift album) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 1989 (Taylor Swift album) was changed by Whoopthereitis12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909944 on 2015-09-17T16:16:19+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1989 (Taylor Swift album), you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whoopthereitis12, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whoopthereitis12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not given chance to respond to sockpuppet allegations

Decline reason:

You can respond in unblock requests here. Max Semenik (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whoopthereitis12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The IPs assigned to the supposed socks are in Tucson, AZ. I have never visited Tucson and was sleeping when the IPs posted.

Decline reason:

I'm not sure I care - none of this addresses the original block reason. There is no need to unblock the account. Kuru (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This block was applied for vandalism, as clearly stated in the block log. Edits here, here, here. Enough. Previous sockpuppets have been labelled User:Wikidawg11, btw. Bye. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]