User talk:Weezerfg78

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4th Degree Burn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Headtrip. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dating Gawi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dating Gawi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dating Gawi (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs referenced information on the concept, recording and critical reviews by reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dating Gawi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dating Gawi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Weezerfg78! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Atlantic306 (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dating Gawi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dating Gawi. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 17:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dating Gawi (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References need to be WP:INCITE. Also, nothing in the content states how this is notable under WP:NMUSIC.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dating Gawi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dating Gawi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Nightenbelle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kjwan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Acoustica article edit warring

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Acoustica (Wolfgang album)]]. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:|article's talk page]], and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I've explained to you in my edit summary why you should not add content without references. If you persist in edit warring with me, I will report your behaviour and you could be blocked from editing. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I got that information from the actual copy of the album itself. Weezerfg78 (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, if the content isn't referenced, even if you got it from a reliable source, you cannot use it on Wikipedia. How can anyone trust that you got it where you claim if there is no traceable reference? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hsve to upload the pic as reference for proof??? how to upload that? Weezerfg78 (talk) 07:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, not a pic, you would have to post an online reference link. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 06:45, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if you have an image, why not upload it to Wikimedia and then add it to the article? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 22:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dating Gawi (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube and Facebook are not reliable sources, no matter if they are the accounts of Universal. Considering the said sources are to music videos, this can be seen as purely promotional. Maybe the submitter would advice how Dating Gawi meets WP:NMUSIC

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dating Gawi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dating Gawi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 12:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Closest Thing to Heaven

Hi Weezerfg78, this is the second article we are conflicting on. When I reverted your previous edit, in my summary, I wrote that the date change you made was unexplained. You MUST add edit summaries to all your edits so that other editors know why you made those changes. Subsequently, you cannot simply go back and make the same change again after being reverted. Your behaviour is beginning to verge on disruptiveness. Please start following appropriate Wikipedia protocol, as there are consequences to disruptive editing. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:04, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.facebook.com/rivermayamusic/posts/the-new-album-closest-thing-to-heaven-is-available-now-some-of-your-fave-record-/136660254946/. I changed the date of release of the album becuase of that link Weezerfg78 (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is a facebook page, so not considered a reliable source. Please stop edit warring. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 18:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can i ask?? this is a different topic. how do you cite reference like this???

https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=0wkEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA46&lpg=PA46&dq=rivermaya+atomic+bomb+billboard+google+book&source=bl&ots=d6Ha3cwjZr&sig=ACfU3U1GpKGbQJHBnqKcpIc5Dgn9LWpJFg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwinwt2B_pP5AhVDgMYKHfdrApsQ6AF6BAgZEAM#v=onepage&q=rivermaya%20atomic%20bomb%20billboard%20google%20book&f=false.

tnx for your reply Weezerfg78 (talk) 12:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually never made that kind of reference before, but hopefully this can help: WP:Citing sources. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern on the about the reference

Can i used this reference? Features the bassist that he left the band? Cause i couldn't find any news article of him leaving the band.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02Xz3LpRngsB3W6wPbXsdudTcvfpCA86NT6xrEPF5ECH43Y9b9my2Y2xvgYk9Cp36wl&id=106986029322584&m_entstream_source=timeline

Or i can just stated that he formed a new band like this reference?

https://ph.news.yahoo.com/travel/blogs/pinoyrocks/peso-movement-s-debut-album-is-a-4-star-riot-042023579.html

Thank you for your reply Weezerfg78 (talk) 15:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Weezerfg78, generally, Facebook is not considered to be a reliable source, so it is not recommended. I would say it's better to go with the yahoo reference. Hope this helps. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

👍 👍. Anyway i couldn't find any news article on that album only on facebook where the band announce that the album itself is now available Weezerfg78 (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's tricky when that happens. I guess you could use the Facebook source and add this template: ^{[better source needed]} Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing i find is this but is this enough to be a reference that the album were release?

https://www.philstar.com/entertainment/2009/09/26/508386/who-does-rivermaya-belong-to/amp/ Weezerfg78 (talk) 18:04, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is good enough as a reference. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 21:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can i ask? Does an article that needs additional references can get deleted or only the unreferenced ones?? Weezerfg78 (talk) 11:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A lack of references actually isn't a strong criterion for article deletion. Articles usually get deleted for lack of notability, among other reasons. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improving editing skills

Hi Weezerfg78, I've been meaning to mention this to you for a while now: I commend you for the work you do on Wikipedia, as you are gradually improving various articles that need references and other content that seems to be within your areas of interest. However, your edits are quite sloppy, and you leave numerous errors that other editors, such as myself, then have to go and clean up. This is a normal part of editing and learning, of course, but it can be improved upon. I would like to encourage you to try and be a little more meticulous and conscientious about the way you edit. Try not to make as many spelling or grammatical errors; observe how markup and punctuation is used across Wikipedia, and try to copy it in your edits instead of repeatedly making basic errors, such as putting periods after citations. When you add a citation, remove the "citation needed" tag. Things like that go a long way in making an article more legible, reducing the workload on other editors, and of course, turning you into a better editor overall. Thank you, and happy editing! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okay Weezerfg78 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can i ask was adding reference is good enough for this article?? Weezerfg78 (talk) 13:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NU_Rock_Award#:~:text=The%20NU%20Rock%20Awards%20was,rock%20artists%20of%20each%20year. Weezerfg78 (talk) 13:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. Are you referring to one specific reference, or several? Additionally, I want to point out to you that while I am currently "watching" your user page, because we have been communicating, normally there isn't a good reason for me to keep user pages on my watchlist, so if you don't tag me when you are addressing me, and if I don't have your user page on my watchlist, I will have no way of knowing that you are asking me a question. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dating Gawi

Hello, Weezerfg78. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dating Gawi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dating Gawi

Hello, Weezerfg78. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dating Gawi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]