User talk:Webwires

SkyCable Smart Cards

Hi, you may want to blur out the serial number of the smart card that you've posted in the SkyCable page if the card itself is still being used.

Hi, thanks for the heads up, I've already requested speedy deletion request. Webwires 05:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

No Problem, thanks for your contribution and significant additions to SkyCable's wiki page. G8crash3r | Talk 14:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to edit the http://phnews.wikia.com/wiki/West_Philippine_Sea in phnews.wikia.com? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.254.30 (talk) 12:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Webwires. You have new messages at Talk:SkyCable.
Message added 12:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SkyCard

I am extremely impressed and amazed, where did you get the photo for SkyCard? Are you working for SkyCable? G8crash3r | Talk 17:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, been with Sky since 1996 and I'm one of the few who got the SkyCard and SkyCard-Citibank Mastercard. And still willing to share information about SkyCable :) webwires | Talk 03:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC

When you said, you've been with Sky since 1996, do you mean as a subscriber, as an employee or both? Do share more. Thanks! :) G8crash3r | Talk 03:55, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NDA :) webwires | Talk 04:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NDA? Non-disclosure agreement? G8crash3r | Talk 14:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup Webwires 05:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, so you are a SkyCable employee then. G8crash3r | Talk 17:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I'm not connected to/with SkyCable. webwires | Talk 14:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SkyCable 450

SkyCable Plus 450 is a postpaid plan and not a prepaid plan. You can check SkyCable Reference section and look for the link or you can go directly to it through this link: SkyCable Plus P450. You can also refer to SkyCable's latest channel line-up, which includes SkyCable 450 Plan through this MS Excel file which came directly from SkyCable, Sky Channel Lineup G8crash3r | Talk 16:32, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you already read my message and cleared up everything. =) By the way, thanks for adding the Basic Cable Packages info. =)G8crash3r | Talk 01:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have something in the "Discussion" page, you might like to comment or share something :) Webwires | Talk 07:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may have opened a new can of worms, I mean. Oh well. G8crash3r | Talk 22:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC

Because of our recent edits to SkyCable, the user Active Banana is again on the pursuit of removing the channel line-up and/or the whole article of SkyCable. You may want to consider defending the reason why the channel line-up should be included in the article or not. I have dealt with him/her before and he/she is so persistent about the reason that channel line-up is un-encyclopedic and unorthy to be included in wikipedia. He/she is also referring to the wiki policy for WP:NOTDIR but it explicitly states that program schedules are prohibited but not chanenl line-ups. G8crash3r | Talk 20:16, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sky logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sky logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 14:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SkyCable Channel Listing

Since you are trying to improve SkyCable's wiki page, you may want to join this discussion. [[1]] G8crash3r | Talk 01:58, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using vibrant colors on the table. The colors right are kinda pale, dont you think? G8crash3r | Talk 01:09, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, vibrant colors can strain eyes, most websites don't use such, it’s a rule of thumb not to implement a lively site in terms of color, and using a Hexadecimal lighter colors favors everyone. By the way, why is it others consistently tagging Discovery HD World to Discovery World HD? Tried a couple of times revising it but they are so tenacious hehehe Merry Christmas! Webwires (talk) 05:48, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Merry Christmas! Well, regarding the table colors, maybe at least increase the intensity of the colors just a little bit or use the same colors before but with a lower intensity. The colors for Music and Foreign categories are dull colors, maybe you can use a different color and yes, it should be Discovery HD World ad not Discovery World HD. G8crash3r | Talk 06:38, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GMA_Network_Inc.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GMA_Network_Inc.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:35, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GMA Network, Inc.

I edited this article on March 23, 2010 and right after, you rollbacked my edits. My intentions were improvement to the article and my time spent on this article were wasted. I think what you are doing is against Wikipedia policy WP:OWN. What is your reason for rolling back my edits? Please reply or I could report your actions. - Briarfallen (talk) 13:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, instead of editing it in parts, you edited the whole article inadvertently missing some points and replacing certain argument with irrelevant information. Some of your edits falls under WP:Advertising. Kindly be civil when someone edit your work and please read: WP:Harrassment, it's like you are threatening me, I hope not. Thanks. Webwires (talk) 22:56, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, in reference to your edits:

GMA Network is not available worldwide rather GMA Pinoy TV and GMA Life TV.
GMA Network is available in some parts in Southeast Asia through local cable companies (i.e. embassy requests)
It is improper to use “corporation” if you are referring to GMA Network, Inc. as the “company” when in fact it uses “incorporated” which refers to limited liabilities. “Company” ~~should be~~ is appropriate.
Using WP:OWN to defend your edits is inappropriate since I don’t own the edits here; it is a collaboration of other Wikipedians. If I reverted your edits and it doesn’t merit to other Wikipedians why it doesn’t conform to your edits.
GMA Network businesses are into television and radio broadcasting and other related industries, as far as I know they are not entered into a telecommunication trade.
The time we spent editing articles in Wikipedia doesn’t merit justifying our edits.
Entry “glued its listeners to the radio” falls under WP:Advertising specifically Item Nos. 1, 4, and 5.

I hope I have cleared everything. Thanks again. Webwires (talk) 01:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your explanation. Let me just clarify first that I spend most of my time improving articles in Wikipedia, mostly related to Philippines, to relax not to argue. Rolling my edits without explanation is disrespectful and breaking the rule per Policy about deletion and abuse of Wikipedia:Rollback feature because you rolled back a legitimate edit, not vandalism. My intention was just asking the reason for rolling back my edits. Rolling it back without any explanation is like you do not want others to touch the article, which is the description of owning an article according to (WP:OWN), and contrary to what Wikipedia is, a collaboration (please read Wikipedia:Editing policy). A bulk of my edits are adding internal links according to (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (linking)). (I am sure that you are aware of it, just in case you are not, differences between edits can be viewed by clicking 'diff' when you check an old version of an article). I also tried to improve the grammar on the article especially on the use of prepositions. Wikipedia is international and not just for Filipinos.

You said and I quote, "Kindly be civil when someone edit your work and please read: WP:Harrassment, it's like you are threatening me, I hope not." You really did not edit my work but you disregard the effort I spent improving the article, disregarding the Rollback feature policy. I was just bringing up the error on your part. Please indicate which part of the WP:Harassment does that fall into.

In my defense on the things you identified are errors, please read what telecommunication on Wikipedia is all about. I added an internal link to the word when I edited the article per WP:link. Did you check it? Telecommunication is transmission of information for the purpose of communication. Radio and television are part of or considered telecommunication, as the Wikipedia article will support it. When I was still in the Philippines, GMA identify their property or station as telecommunication facilities during signing off.

You misinterpreted the meaning of telecommunication, and using Wikipedia as a scapegoat to us it. GMA Network and any other television stations belong to the broadcasting industry and not telecommunication. See: [telecommunications companies], nowhere you can find radio and television stations on the list. Generally, they are part of the whole telecommunications thing, but it is improper to refer them as such in business.

GMA Pinoy TV and GMA Life TV broadcast worldwide and they are owned by of GMA Network, Inc. (which this article is all about) and what they broadcast are shows by GMA. Basically, GMA Pinoy TV's programming are delayed telecasts of GMA Network shows, therefore GMA are available worldwide. Or, I should have said that GMA Network shows are broadcasted worldwide through GMA Pinoy TV.

You answered your query here. GMA Network (the local television network in the Philippines) is not available worldwide rather programs shown on GMA Network are available worldwide via GMA Pinoy TV and Life TV.

On the History section, the paragraph started with the pronoun "It". Don't you think there is something wrong with that, starting a section with a pronoun. Improper to use "corporation"? Please read about Corporation and incorporation. Corporation have limited liabilities. Corporations are established by incorporation. GMA Network, Inc. is a corporation established by incorporation, that is why it is called Incorporated. If you read About GMA, they use the word "Corporate" on the company's purpose, vision and values.

I am not in any way related to GMA, and like I told you earlier, I do spend a lot of my time improving on articles related to Philippines. How could the phrase “glued its listeners to the radio” falls under WP:Advertising? And you identified items 1, 4, and 5. Could you please elaborate on that, so I may correct myself if I am wrong? I checked those items and it does not make sense to the phrase. Previous to my corrections that line on the History section said: "Initial coverage of its radio network is then President Ramon Magsaysay’s death, the eruption of Mount Hibok-Hibok on March 17, 1957 and various local elections in the Philippines." I verified the dates and information on that statement and they were wrong in many ways because when it says "initial coverage" (singular) that means the first broadcast therefore 1950. Mount Hibok-Hibok's last eruption was in 1951 not March 17, 1957, which is actually the day when President Ramon Magsaysay's plane crashed. I corrected the mistake and replaced the statement with: "Coverages of its radio station like the 1951 eruption of Mount Hibok-Hibok, President Ramon Magsaysay’s death in 1957, and various local elections in the Philippines, glued its listeners to the radio." Those are tragic events in the history of the Philippines worth listening to, or metaphorically "glued its listener to the radio." Maybe I forgot to put a reference on that, but the phrase came from the GMA website "About GMA Network". Please check it out. All my statements are backed by references and citations if not, please use WP:Citation needed when needed. I just checked the current version of the article and you made some changes in that section. But still, Magsaysay's date of death is wrong. He was elected in 1953 and died in 1957 not 1953. This is one reason why collaboration is important.

How about when GMA Network started broadcasting in 1961 as DZBB TV? I checked all the History pages of GMA websites and never it was mentioned as DZBB TV, as that's already the call ID for the AM station. I check the references and that was not mentioned. I checked another GMA site,GMA History, where is says in 1961, "taking off from the success of DZBB, RBS TV Channel 7, the third television station in the country, starts operations." Based on that website itself, they never called it as DZBB TV when it started in 1961. Don't you agree? You can only use a station call ID one time, which is why I removed it from the history because the statement is false.

Again, check GMA Network Wikipedia under “1960s” I hope Wikipedia or any other Wikipedians did not invented the logo… “Original logo used by DZBB TV Channel 7 (1961-1974).”

About the Kapuso network under GMA Network section, where it says, "GMA Radio Television Arts and GMA Rainbow Satellite Network) is commonly signified to as the “Kapuso Network” in reference to the outline of the company’s logo." It is suggesting that the logo was made first and therefore the network is now called "Kapuso Network" because of the logo? Because that's what it is saying right now. Is that really correct and my edit was really wrong? I checked the reference on that statement which is GMA Network, and it does not say that. So I changed it to "GMA Radio Television Arts and GMA Rainbow Satellite Network) is commonly referred to as the “Kapuso Network”, signified by the outline of the company’s logo." I just rephrased the sentence so that it will make sense and not misleading. Did you think my correction is wrong?

Again, you quoted the article out of context… the article says… “Launched on October 29, 1961, GMA Network (formerly known as DZBB TV Channel 7, RBS TV channel 7, GMA Radio Television Arts and GMA Rainbow Satellite Network) is commonly signified to as the “Kapuso Network” in reference to the outline of the company’s logo.” GMA unveiled its new corporate and station logo on October 27, 2002 and signify itself as the Kapuso network in reference to the logo, shape of heart. Before the unveiling the logo, GMA is not a Kapuso network until they launched it. The logo implies new identity not the other way around. If we can trace back history, early morning of October 27, 2002 the GMA logo started appearing at the upper right corner of television screen but no one or nobody from GMA Network until at exactly 12:00 noon, Philippine Standard Time when they announced that GMA is now a “Kapuso” network. To properly addressed your query, technically, the logo was ~~made~~ introduced first before they started calling themselves as “Kapuso”.

What is "fictional" as part of television programming on the second paragraph of the lead section? What kind of programming is that? Could you please provide an example where they use the word? On the third paragraph of the lead section, is "accompaniment" really the right word to use there that's why you rolled back my edit? I replaced the word with 'accompanies' which is better, but wrong because I should have used accompany (third person plural).

I was working on the Robert "Uncle Bob" Stewart so I have been working on GMA's history as well and it is not out of whim that I edited GMA Network, Inc.. I based some of my edits from GMA webpages and I verify them before I press SAVE. I only did the upper part of GMA Network, Inc. because if I get hooked on an article, I would spend plenty of time on it.

But, there is no limit on how much you edit an article, especially if the article is erroneous. On the top of your reply you said,"instead of editing it in parts, you edited the whole article inadvertently missing some points and replacing certain argument with irrelevant information." Could you please show me on Wikipedia rules where it mentions that you can only a small part at a time? Which parts are irrelevant information? Please by specific.

You mentioned, "Using WP:OWN to defend your edits is inappropriate since I don’t own the edits here; it is a collaboration of other Wikipedians. If I reverted your edits and it doesn’t merit to other Wikipedians why it doesn’t conform to your edits." Yes, I do respect other peoples edits, but what if the information is wrong? Just because somebody edited it before does not make it right, especially if it has no references, I will just leave it as is and not do anything (WP:Editing policy). We do not want to pass out wrong information on Wikipedia, right? I always follow Wikipedia policy when trying to fix articles per Try to fix problems. If I changed something, please check my references. Could you please specify which edits are you referring to?

I will be editing the GMA Network, Inc. soon, and in my capacity, abiding with Wikipedia policy and rules. I hope that you too. Please remember that Wikipedia is a collaboration and everything here is transparent, whatever we do is visible to everybody. If I find mistakes, maybe because the grammar is wrong (I'm not perfect, I also make mistakes on grammar) or the statement is wrong and unreferenced, then I will correct it. I will surely be backing it up with citations. If I forget, please let me know, and not rolling it back, per Wikipedia rules. Please, let us improve the Philippine articles on Wikipedia. (For example, the reference section on GMA Network, Inc. needs cleaning up. I saw four similar references but listed as separate.). Thanks. - Briarfallen (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To wrap it up, I don’t need to explain further and elucidate nonsense arguments. I don’t need to be conceited ~~to prove~~ or self-proclaimed that I’m more knowledgeable than others. I don’t need to point what I contributed just for the sake it. I’m not above or special with anyone, we are just like him or her trying to improve Wikipedia. I welcome your and other Wikipedians edits but make your edits in parts. Not all edits are valid and some will missed the value of the article. Don’t try to be “you know everything”…in the end, you don’t. Again, its more than five years that no one tries to improve the article and now someone did, others are all here just to get credits. Webwires (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AksyonTV controversy

Hi there! I am informing SkyCable article has been condemned on its line-up for adding AksyonTV. Whether AksyonTV will be on channel 61, EWTN will be a sole channel and transfer to channel 76 on the same day? Any thoughts? ApprenticeFan ^work 12:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it will be correlative since channel 76 is only a mirror channel of EWTN. Thanks. :) Webwires (talk) 12:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GMA Network Inc.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GMA Network Inc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MTV Asia and MTV Southeast Asia are only one channel

Hello!! Please be inform to you that MTV Asia and MTV Southeast Asia are only one channel. MTV Asia management confirm this news (Official) but they question what MTV Asia Channel?? and please be specific channel whether MTV SEA (Southeast Asia) MTV India among others, while I chat last week that both two channels are only one content and program schedule even the satellite provider in Singapore name as MTV Asia in IRD but the actual satellite channel data was MTV Southeast Asia when I travel during the MTV studio tour. Its true that MTV Network in US via website is still retain as MTV Asia even before including their official website. However MTV Asia is now known as MTV SEA (Southeast Asia) is now broadcast across Southeast Asia (including the Philippines and Hong Kong). http://www.lyngsat.com/intel8.html (MTV Southeast Asia in Intelsat 8 via lyngsat (Updated)). In fact I can prove to you MTV Asia is now known as MTV SEA or MTV Southeast Asia in Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia:

http://www.indovision.tv/index.php?mod=SB0003&PHPSESSID=c88512b000399ca7d28e9bf4e16cc8d0 (For Indovision Channel Line-Up)
http://www.starhub.com/entertainment/channel/mtvsea.html (For MTV SEA feature Channel in STARHub in Singapore which is also MTV SEA main broadcast)

and here's the example of News MTV Southeast Asia news (From MTV website) during Ladygaga tour in Japan:

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1661975/lady-gaga-mtv-music-aid-awards-japan-perform.jhtml.

However the reference of MTV Asia History is not updated:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1996_March_19/ai_18104241/ (MTV Asia news in 1996),

If you have any questions please e-mail MTV Asia for clarification that MTV Asia and MTV Southeast Asia are only one channel: tech@mtvasia.com. Sorry but no offense I'm just tell you the truth. Thank you!! Puppyph (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, first of all I never mentioned MTV Asia and MTV Southeast Asia are different entities, separate feed, another channel whatsoever. What I’m trying to say and trying to resolve is the official name of the channel from the Philippine-end; I will get back to you when MTV Asia replied to my queries and will let you know the details. Unfortunately, you have time to supply references on my Talk Page but forgot to mention it to the Wikipage itself. Thanks. Webwires (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revertion

Please do not undo any revision that is clearly not a vandalism. All of my revision is supported by references. For further informations, please visit the corporate website of ABS-CBN Corporation. The external link is here: ABS-CBN Investor Relation - Hollyckuhno (talk) 21:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for signing to my talk page but the version prior to your edit is much more suitable than your own style. SkyCable Corporation operates SkyCable and SkyCable Corporation is one of ABS-CBN Corporation subsidiaries. Obviously SkyCable operates as one of ABS-CBN Corporation subsidiaries and there’s no need to expand and emphasize that it is “now operate as a subsidiary of.” Thanks. Webwires (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding. But I must say it's not yours to decide which version is better.(That's why there is a discussion page.) Because in creating an article here in Wikipedia for a certain company, we are bounded by standards. First, the text should be encyclopedic(clearly yours is not). Second it should be indicated what type of company the article is referring to. And please, we all know that SkyCable Corporation and SkyCable is just referring to a single company.(SkyCable owns itself? funny.) Lastly, what the hell did you did in the history section? You just made it difficult to understand[for the readers], it has basically the same meaning.- Hollyckuhno (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have the privilege to decide which version must stay or must go since its a collaboration. Don't tell me that the text is unencyclopedic, kindly read your version and decide if its more encyclopedic than the entries published. For your information, SkyCable is the brand name used by SkyCable Corporation for its cable business, now who's funny? I did not invent the history section, take time to click the corresponding resources cited before signing to my talk page. Difficult to understand to whom? It is much more difficult for someone who does not know what the subject is, only relying on references per se and using such, word for word. And please, try to write a good English before making such comment. Webwires (talk) 15:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I told you, this is the article for the cable company. So technically this article should be renamed(moved) to SkyCable Corporation. Bottomline, SkyCable and SkyCable Corporation is basically the same entity. The word SkyCable is just a stylized name, a trade name. I must warn you, you're making a 3RR violation. If you do not stop reverting my edits, you leave me no choice but to report you for blocking. You are also clearly engaging in edit warring. - Hollyckuhno (talk) 12:09, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you or didn't you understand the subject? SkyCable is part of SkyCable Corporation and any information related to SkyCable Corporation or SkyCable as the cable company goes with this Wikipage. As long as the entries are related to SkyCable (cable company) that's why the entries are mere references to the cable company. And there's no entries that specifically states that the Wikipage is SkyCable Corporation. Don't warn me because you started reverting edits for your own benefit. Don't use the "3RR" warning because you don't know what the guidelines says. READ your edit my god, you need English 101. If like you will govern Wikipedia I guess all entries here is are garbage. Let me remind you again, that the entries you have made makes no merit at all. Go ahead and report me, the admins here are more opinionated than you think. This Wikipage is a collaboration of other Wikipedians and you think you are more knowledgeable than them? Reading your edits from other Wikipages reminds me of a newbie that needs tutorial 101. Again, report me, you have all the privileges. Let see. Webwires (talk) 16:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So if you're emphasizing that the Wikipedia is a collaborative program, how come you keep on reverting my edits even it is clearly not a vandalism and don't start with me, I never said that I am more knowledgeable than other wikipedians. I am merely revising your original works to make it clearer and more encyclopedic because I honestly believe that an encyclopedic article is more precise, shorter, and is easy-to-understand. Anyway I am tired with you, if you think your version is better than mine, then be my guest. - Hollyckuhno (talk) 12:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What more tiring than answering your selfish reservations. Let me remind you again, I NEVER SAID that your edits are vandalism, what I'm trying to point out is that you are adding entries to this Wikipage and making it more complicated. As what you have said precise, shorter and easy to understand then take your edits for example and let see, frankly its shorter but is NOT precise and easy to understand. You have the luxury of copying the context source from the original content, word for word and you have the guts to defend your it and accusing me of an edit erring. Let the administrator decide. Webwires (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you don't no me so please don't judge me. But if you are saying that wikipedia is a collaborative program then think again of what you are just doing for the sake of your ego. Thank You for your time. - Hollyckuhno (talk) 13:27, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A piece of advise, please take some time reading Wikipedia:OWN. This would be my last post. Thank you very much. God Bless. hollyckuhno 18:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at SkyCable. I am blocking to prevent a future disruption due to your ease in ignoring 3RR and not acknowledging the issue. I have no problems with your continuing discussions. But 3RR, you should not cross when it's an edit dispute.. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Wifione ^Message 13:44, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Webwires (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I violated the 3RR but do you think its fair to blocked me alone? How about the other user who reported me? I made my first revert and the user reverted my revision and started the discussion unfortunately instead of defending his edit he also violated the 3RR by not resolving the disputed issue. I accept the punishment due to the violation I made but be fair enough on your judgment, don't be one sided just because someone reported a violation you will act against the reported user and not weighing on the grounds of the discussion and not giving merit why the 3RR is committed. Thanks. Webwires 14:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

First, a block is never punishment - it's preventative. Second, your unblock request (which this is not) should address only your own behaviour. Third, calling for someone else's block might just show that you don't truly understand why you personally were blocked (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

STAR Movies HD

Hello, Its it true what i read in the cable and satellite website that STAR Movies HD International will be replaced by FOX Movies Premium effected next year?! Which means STAR Movies HD subscribers in SkyCable, G Sat and Cignal Digital TV will also affected the new movie HD channel?! reply to me for the answer! Puppyph (talk) 06:08, 27 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.3.182.82 (talk) [reply]

Hi, STAR Movies HD will be replaced by Fox Movies Premium HD on January 1, 2012 unfortunately subscribers in Taiwan and the Philippines are not affected by this rebranding. STAR Movies and STAR Movies HD brands will continue to broadcast only in Taiwan and Philippines territories. Thanks. Webwires 10:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, AFAIK as of December 2011, Fox International Channels includes the Philippine terriroty to broadcast Fox Movies Premium on January 1, 2012. Thanks. Webwires 10:35, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

PBBUnlimited PPV

Hello, Please be inform to you that PBBUnlimited (Pinoy Big Brother) PPV is now return next month via Channel 73, December 1, 2011. It was officially announce via SkyCable's official Twitter account http://twitter.com/#!/SKYserves Puppyph (talk) 08:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, by this time, we are all aware that Pinoy Big Brother 24/7 will be available to all digital subscribers of SkyCable on December 1. With regards to this the "SkyCable Season Pass" is more appropriate name channel to be used since it will violate the WP:Advertising guidelines if others will insist in using the "Pinoy Big Brother 24/7" name channel. Thanks. Webwires 14:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on GMA News TV. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not use such conduct ViperSnake151 Talk 01:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, don't have time to argue with fickle minded people. Go ahead and edit the way you want it to be. Its a waste of time replying to you. Webwires 02:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Freeview Channel HD, Outdoor Channel HD and Fashion TV HD

Can you try to reference your edit to an authorized source? WP:CRYSTAL G8crash3r | Talk 17:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

== Future channels/CAMANA listings ==

Hi, it is irrelevant to include the list of future channels if you don't have any references to be cited or back up your edits. Please be considerate, don’t do some edit just for the heck of it. The “Company Timeline” was already tagged Unreferenced Section and Trivia, if you want to help, try to cite references. Also, the lineup covers Metropolitan Manila only. If you want to include CAMANAVA, cite reliable sources and use your Wiki names and not your respective IPs, from now on, all edits from IP addresses without proper and reliable references will be reverted. Thanks. Webwires (talk) 04:53, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

G8crash3r | Talk 00:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, kindly read WP:CRYSTAL Rule No. 1, it clearly states "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place." Regarding my previous posts, I was referring to listing that will not actually take place, you know what I mean. You yourself can justify the improvements of this Wikipage and if you can back track all my edits here, information I have provided for the past nth months can attest to the veracity of certain data. And if you happens to be an All-In Pack subscriber which I am, you can also confirm my edit. Thanks. Webwires 02:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Gmanewstv.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Gmanewstv.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Radio Broadcasting Station.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Radio Broadcasting Station.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:06, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GMA News TV

The article GMA News TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Sources generally fail WP:RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gmanewstvinternational.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gmanewstvinternational.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Webwires. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skycable new.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skycable new.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Discovery world hd (small globe).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Discovery world hd (small globe).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Webwires. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skycable hd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skycable hd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor Philippines Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor Philippines Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor Philippines Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor Philippines Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Philippine flag on television.png

The file File:Philippine flag on television.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Skycard mastercard.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Skycard mastercard.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. ✗plicit 02:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Imacg5.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Imacg5.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:40, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]