User talk:Wcamp9

Welcome

Hello, GreyChen, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following:

visit the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have
type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will answer your questions shortly
visit the directory of help pages

There are a lot of standards and policies here, but as long as you are editing in good faith, you are encouraged to be bold in updating pages. Here are a few links you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Again, welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 01:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at the Guild of Copy Editors

Hi Wcamp9 (formerly GreyChen), thanks for your interest in the Guild of Copy Editors. In case you've disabled pings, I've left you a message in response to your request at the GOCE Requests page here. There's a discussion about the request at the talk page, where you are welcome to comment. In case the request is removed before you see this message, here's a permalink to it. Thanks for your time; happy editing and cheers, Baffle☿gab 18:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have just checked it out. Thank you Wcamp9 (talk) 18:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Wcamp9 (talk) 01:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flesh and Fantasie moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Flesh and Fantasie. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources need to be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kurt Cobain at MTV Unplugged.webp

A tag has been placed on File:Kurt Cobain at MTV Unplugged.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note - It is not from MTV as you stated in the non-free usage rationale. The Britannica source identifies the image as being from Pictorial Press/Alamy whish is a commercial image agency. Additionally, the image fails to satisfy WP:NFCC#1 as there is a free image of Cobain in the article in the infobox. -- Whpq (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Nirvana 1993.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nirvana 1993.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ready to Die

It's already a GA article from 2008, and skimming over it, it doesn't look too bad. If you send it to peer review, and start work you could conceivably send it to FA in August, and then it may get FA status. I'd also suggest sending it to Guild of Copy-editors. It would make more sense to run the album on its 30th than to run Biggie Small's biographical page instead. Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

You have recently made edits related to discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. This is a standard message to inform you that discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. - SchroCat (talk) 05:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tupac and Biggie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tupac and Biggie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, Wcamp9. I noticed that your recent edit to East Coast–West Coast hip hop rivalry added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Persia Monir (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources must meet WP:RS before accepted. Example, IMDb isn't reliable, and the rest, her personal website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Persia Monir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wcamp9! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]