Jump to content

User talk:Wasimawan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Muslim Jats

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Muslim Jats, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of Jat clans of West Punjab. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dastan Dodo-. Chanesar

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dastan Dodo-. Chanesar, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.uok.edu.pk/faculties/sindhi/soomroEng.pdf. As a copyright violation, Dastan Dodo-. Chanesar appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dastan Dodo-. Chanesar has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dastan Dodo-. Chanesar and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dastan Dodo-. Chanesar with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dastan Dodo-. Chanesar.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you.

Could you also explain the title? Edgepedia (talk) 11:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pir Abdul Khaliq

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Pir Abdul Khaliq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Junior

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Junior requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 14:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Junior, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 14:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Junior. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RadioFan (talk) 14:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hafiz-ul-milan Hafiz Muhammad Siddique Of Bhar Chandi, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://bharchundisharif.org/dargah/index.php?mod=text&tid=13, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Hafiz-ul-milan Hafiz Muhammad Siddique Of Bhar Chandi saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Muradyab Khan (Nawab Sarbuland Khan)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Muradyab Khan (Nawab Sarbuland Khan) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dr.K. logos 07:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Makhdum Nuh of Hala (Sindh)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Makhdum Nuh of Hala (Sindh) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dr.K. logos 07:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Khudabad mosque.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kalhora Dynasty

[edit]

I note that you recently added a large quantity of text to the article on the Kalhora Dynasty; from the style of language used, it's obvious that you have copied this material from a very old book.

If the book is old enough, then that is legally permissible... if you specify where you have taken the material from.

"This article includes material taken from (name of book), written by (author) in (year), a publication now in the public domain".

You MUST do this for each article to which you incorporate material from a public-domain source. DS (talk) 14:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Khudabad Mosque

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Khudabad Mosque, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dawn.com/weekly/dmag/archive/070114/dmag7.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khudabad Mosque

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Khudabad Mosque requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 05:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

[edit]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Khudabad Mosque. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 05:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Khudabad Mosque. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 05:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sindhi topi (Sindhi Cap)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sindhi topi (Sindhi Cap) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Anna Lincoln 11:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Khudabad Mosque, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. – Toon 15:35, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Kalan kot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Skier Dude  ►  00:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pir shaheed.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pir shaheed.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude  ►  00:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mian Shahul Mouhammed Kalhoro

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mian Shahul Mouhammed Kalhoro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Basket of Puppies 07:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mian Sarfraz Kalhoro (Khudayar Khan)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mian Sarfraz Kalhoro (Khudayar Khan) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Basket of Puppies 07:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

recent

[edit]

http://www.usindh.edu.pk/agmqc/qasmi_biodata.html Is this the same person? Pepermint Chills (talk) 07:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghulam Mustafa Qasmi

[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Ghulam Mustafa Qasmi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pepermint Chills (talk) 07:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have rescued this page from speedy deletion, as you have asserted his importance as a scholar, but you really need to expand the article. What are his dates? Is he still alive? Give us more information. Thanks. PamD (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy

[edit]

I found a page above(look at Recent)that seems to coincide with the small info you present. You need to add sources to the artical to give the subject importance.Pepermint Chills (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Hayya Al-Sindhi

[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Mohammad Hayya Al-Sindhi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pianoplonkers♫(talk) 07:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Abu Ata Sindhi, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PDCook (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Allama Makhdoom Muhammad Hashim Thattvi. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. PDCook (talk) 01:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Sindhi people. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. PDCook (talk) 01:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Sindhi people, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. PDCook (talk) 01:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Maulana Taj Mohammad Amrothi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PDCook (talk) 02:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sindhi people3.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sindhi people3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Allamah Muhammad bin Abdulhadi al-Sindi

[edit]

The article Allamah Muhammad bin Abdulhadi al-Sindi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established. The references are difficult or impossible to verify.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 16:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Jamia Mosque (Khudabad). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PDCook (talk) 16:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Pacco Qillo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PDCook (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hafiz-ul-milan Hafiz Muhammad Siddique Of Bhar Chandi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PDCook (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Mohammadabad, Sindh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PDCook (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maulana Taj Mohammad Amrothi

[edit]

The article Maulana Taj Mohammad Amrothi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ba'ab-ul-Islam, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.scribd.com/doc/13455764/The-People-and-the-Land-of-Sindh, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ba'ab-ul-Islam saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! AtticusX (talk) 10:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

STOP copy-pasting copyrighted material

[edit]

I have reverted your most recent additions to Sindhi people because they contained extensive copy-pasting of copyrighted material from History of the Indian Subcontinent (including its typos), and the image you added is obviously not your own work as claimed.

I see a troubling pattern of blatant copy-pasting from copyrighted sources in many edits in your history, some of which still have not been spotted and removed by other editors. I strongly encourage you to stop plagiarizing other people's work when contributing to Wikipedia; such violations of Wikipedia's policies create massive headaches for your fellow editors as we try to clean up after you. It has been said many times above, but I'll say it again: continuing this behavior WILL GET YOU BLOCKED from editing Wikipedia.

If you are unclear on Wikipedia's policies on copyright, there is a whole host of documents available to help you understand what's allowed and what is not. WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:COPYPASTE are good starting places. AtticusX (talk) 11:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the content above, I have verified that you have pasted content into Sindhi people. A contribution copyright investigation has been opened to evaluate your contributions at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Wasimawan. Where possible, every effort will be made to verify that your contributions do not constitute copyright problems, but in accordance with policy, your past additions to those articles may be removed indiscriminately given your history of violating copyright policy. Our policies forbid copying content that has been previously published elsewhere unless you are able to prove that this material is not governed by copyright. The only exception is that you may copy brief excerpts for good reasons such as those set out at Wikipedia:Non-free content if you mark these with quotation marks or block quote them and if you provide a clear citation to the source. Copying content that you cannot prove is public domain or licensed compatibly to Wikipedia's Terms of Use is a violation of copyright policy. If you have questions about copyright policy, I will do my best to explain them, but you must be careful when you return to editing. Additional violations of copyright policy after your block expires are likely to lead to your account's being blocked from contributing for a longer time — perhaps permanently. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:019PHO0001009S4U01486000-SVC1-.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:019PHO0001009S4U01486000-SVC1-.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the edit summary box

[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Balochistan (Pakistan), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 11:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Mu`in ibn Muhammad Amin al-Sindi.

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Mu`in ibn Muhammad Amin al-Sindi. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Schuhpuppe (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Wasimawan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Mohammad Hayya Al-Sindhi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from other sources without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you believe this block is unjustified or if you are able to provide a credible assertion that you understand and intend to comply with these policies, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
After noticing that you pasted extensive content from [1] into Sindhi people, I checked your recent article Abu Ata Al-Sindi and discovered that the content is previously published in a 2003 book: [2]. Given evidence that you are continuing to ignore our copyright policies, we have no choice but to suspend your account. I do not believe you should be unblocked without some compelling reason. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Makhdum Nuh of Hala (Sindh) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makhdum Nuh of Hala (Sindh) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makhdum Nuh of Hala (Sindh) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:Coin of jam nizam.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Dodo Bin Khafef Soomro III" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dodo Bin Khafef Soomro III. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 19#Dodo Bin Khafef Soomro III until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wasimawan&oldid=1191124646"