Talk:Muhammad Hayyat ibn Ibrahim al-Sindhi

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saudi Arabia Low‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Islam

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://aa.trinimuslims.com/showthread.php?t=275; http://www.scribd.com/doc/15436630/Life-of-AbdulWahhaab (p. 16, footnote); http://www.scribd.com/doc/14344612/Sindi-and-Wahab-in-18th-Century (p. 8). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MLauba (talk) 13:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

The article has serious deficiency of citations. I am not stating that the article is "politically" skewed, but the article makes no use of references and rather looks like a cut paste page. I would like to improve the article, but it sbeyond the scope of one Wikipedian. I want all the admins in the Portal: Pakistan to look into the matter.

Unsourced content

I am keeping all uncited info under "unsoured" heading. Admins are welcome to edit/ remove this section.Messiaindarain (talk) 06:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mohammad Hayya Al-Sindhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110717100925/http://aa.trinimuslims.com/showthread.php?t=275 to http://aa.trinimuslims.com/showthread.php?t=275

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration on reliable sources

I have once again restored the sources from Brill and Da Capo Press. Do not remove these without discussing first. I have also removed non academic sources such as Zarabozo. Do not add them without discussing first. 86.159.114.238 (talk) 12:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Madhab

Infobox says Shafi`i, article says Hanafi. The source of the Shafi`i claim lists the source of the Hanafi claim as one of its own sources, and my guess is the author just mixed things up, as the passage where Voll mentions Sindhi's Madhab is awkwardly phrased ("Perhaps related to this is the fact that out of the 24 scholars whose madhhab is given or can be reasonably inferred, only three, including this mufti and al-’Ajami, are Hanafi. The third, Abi al-Hasan al-Sindi, was of Indian origin. The prominence of the Hanafi madhhab in India may explain his position and also Muhammad Hayyat’s own atypicality in this regard, since he was also a Hanafi."). I've never heard of Sindhi referred to as a Shafi`i anywhere outside of God's Terrorists, and the Hanafi claim seems much more likely just based on wher ehe comes from. Either way, the article should list one of them, or mention it's disputed at the very least.

On a related note, God's Terrorists doesn't seem very academic from a brief skim of it, is not written about Sindhi (he's just mentioned briefly as a teacher of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab), and doesn't contain any extra information about him that he didn't take from Voll's work, so it may be best to just cut out the middleman and cite Voll directly. HappiDude (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]