User talk:Wanna Know My Name? Later

Welcome!

Hello, Wanna Know My Name? Later, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JHMM13 (T | C) 20:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Lennon's death

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please replace the speedy deletion tag with {{subst:afd}}, and you can make your case for keeping the article by following the instructions in the AFD box. Thank you. I have gone ahead and already requested this for deletion, so you can vote on it by following the link on the article's page. JHMM13 (T | C) 20:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your email, I don't know what you mean by "why would you let the 'paul is dead' article" be there. I have never seen or heard of such an article, but if it makes sufficient claims of notability in popular culture, such a conspiracy theory might warrant its own article. I really don't know anything about that one. Anyway, I encourage you to continue editing, and please ask me any questions you might have on my talk page. JHMM13 (T | C)

21:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't exactly see why I should have seen it before. By the same logic, I should tell you that you should allow an article on some to-be saint (if ever you would oppose such a thing) because you have obviously agreed to allow the Eurosia Fabris article, since you have seen every article on Wikipedia. Please do not continue emailing me, as my talk page is the proper place for this sort of discussion. JHMM13 (T | C)

23:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia definitely is an interesting site. However, there are some pretty steady guidelines as to what is and is not allowed on Wikipedia. Most of the information needs to be verifiable (or at least agreed upon through consensus) because, without verifiability, we can't come close to guaranteeing the factual accuracy of an article. Often times, many things that do not deserve their own articles can be added as a mention on another page that is more-encompassing to the larger issue (as long as it is referenced with sources). I have not read every article on Wikipedia. I did not know about the Paul is Dead conspiracy until you told me about it, and if you feel it is not verifiable or notable enough, you can nominate it for deletion by adding {{subst:afd}} on the top of the page so we can achieve some community consensus. However, look at all the references and external links on that page that suggest notability. Wikipedia is not infinite, and it's also not a bunch of other things, but it's usually hard for a new user to understand everything about the process and the limitations we live under. It's also difficult for us vandal-fighters to tell the difference between someone being malicious and someone acting on good faith, which is why I have to assume every editor is acting in good faith, such as you obviously were. I'm just human, though, so sometimes I might grow annoyed or something, so please forgive me if I was out of line with any of my comments, and I continue to encourage you to really get into Wikipedia. Perhaps you can check out some Wikiprojects you might be interested in, for instance. Either way, you're always welcome to ask me any questions you have, make any comments, requests, crude jokes, or whatever else you can possibly think of on my talk page, where there's no such thing as limitations (vandalism excepted, of course). JHMM13 (T | C)

15:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MovieMistakes

Alright, the problem here (as I'm sure you can tell) is the capitalization. It is important to recognize that "MovieMistakes" and "Moviemistakes" are two completely differnt articles because of the capitalization. Since "Moviemistakes" is something of a unique word, you can create redirects for it. I suggest you do this following process at three pages, "Moviemistake," "MovieMistake," and "Moviemistakes," but no more than just those:

It's very simple to create a redirect. All you do is enter this onto a new page:

#REDIRECT [[MovieMistakes]]

And that's it! JHMM13 (T | C) 14:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hey, thanks for the email. For future reference, can you please contact me by writing on my talk page? I only like receiving emails about Wikipedia if it's something urgent. I've got a lot of work to do, and I set aside certain amounts of time for Wikipedia, so I'm not too happy when it gets interrupted :-D. In order to translate the article for POA, create a test page where you can work on it until you've got it translated properly (i.e. type in /Currentproject at the end of the url for your user page to create a "subpage" that you can work on), then you can go to the POA (movie) page on EN, check out the left column and look for Espanol where you can go and translate it. JHMM13 (T | C) 18:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

H-Pot

Hey, sorry about the delay in response. I just got on spring break and I was snowboarding all of yesterday. Nice job on the POA article! I don't know anything about Spanish translation, but it looks like you're blazing a new trail in terms of Spanish Harry Potter film articles. Before you translate the entire, thing you may want to check into the formats of different Wikipedias. For instance, there doesn't appear to be a Harry Potter portal on the Es-Wiki (at least none that I can easily find out), so you may want to take that top bit off the page. It's also important to note that the Spanish version of the films may have had different details than the English version (although this is probably incidental). Check around the Community Portal for both En-Wiki and Es-Wiki to get some help, but in the mean time, you can post it to the Spanish Wikipedia under the equivalent name in Spanish. Then you can link to it from the En version by following the format at the bottom of the page for other WP languages. If you have any questions, ask the Spanish translators first, then come to me if you're having trouble. I'm really not a translation expert. JHMM13 (T | C) 20:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Luigismw.PNG

Hello, Wanna Know My Name? Later. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Luigismw.PNG) was found at the following location: User:Wanna Know My Name? Later/Differences between Super Mario World and Super Mario Advance 2. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manolo Cabeza de Huevo

I have reverted some of the edits you have made to the Manolo Cabeza de Huevo article. To be blunt, your English vocabulary is extremely poor, and you use words that do not exist in the English language like "municipy" and "historial." English is not Spanish. You cannot simply take a Spanish word (municipio) and change the spelling a little bit and pretend that it is now an English word (your non-existent word "municipy"). Sometimes there are no cognates, or they are radically different.

Furthermore, your writing style in English employs heavy Spanish syntax. It does not look normal, and instead of arrogantly reverting legitimate language edits by native English speakers you should be open to the edits people contribute. Your reversions make this article look very poor and non-encyclopedic, and I would venture to say even juvenile. Please allow others to edit or this will result in the page being flagged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.21.86.225 (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I made some mistakes, but that doesn't mean that my English is actually poor. About the "municipy" word... yes, it was a mistake, but you don't have to tell that one million times to make it clear.

Something else, who are you to make a note in my talk page, without being a Wikipedian? I am a Wikipedian, you're not. So don't be in my talk page for something like this.

You do speak like a Wikipedian, though. But you're not. So don't bother me.

Besides, ALL of that article was created by me. ALL is perfectly written, and you come here and tell me about a stupid word. Come on.

Oh, and about my English, I just got a 98/100 in an English test. Sounds good to me.WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ] 16:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One does not have to register and get a password to edit Wikipedia, and you should know that. No article, including your talk page, is restricted to Wikipedians unless they are locked because of disputes or vandalism. FYI, many loyal readers correct pages that they enjoy and want to improve.

Next, your page is REPLETE with grammatical errors in English and invented words, however laudable your effort was. In sum, it is not "perfectly written." My point is and always shall be, do NOT revert legitimate edits to this or any article, especially when done for the purpose of correcting the mistakes you may have made with the English language. You are shooting yourself in the foot. BTW, congrats on your test scores, but mastering a language comes from many years of speaking, reading, writing and studying it. Keep endeavoring to master the language, but you must also not resist edits in the meantime. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.237.197.107 (talk) 05:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know somebody doesn't have to be a Wikipedian to edit pages. But it doesn't seem right that any guest can enter and edit my talk page.

About the gramatical errors, yeah, there are some, so why don't you correct them? You speak and speak about editing Wikipedia, so why don't you go ahead and correct them?

One last thing, you said that I went and reverted the changes you made so the mistakes are there again. I have not done such a thing. You should check the history page of the article to view who changed it before saying something like that. WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ] 19:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Google Chrome 4.0.249.78 NTP.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Google Chrome 4.0.249.78 NTP.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Copyrighted elements?

Hello, Wanna Know My Name? Later. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Luigisprites.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Luigisprites.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chrome 4.0.249.78 Wikipedia.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chrome 4.0.249.78 Wikipedia.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Songr

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Songr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Swimnteach (talk) 00:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ManoloCabezaHuevo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ManoloCabezaHuevo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:ManoloCabezaHuevo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ManoloCabezaHuevo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited IPod Nano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Screen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. When you recently edited Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, your recent edits to the Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film) plot summary added a significant amount of unneeded detail and have been reverted. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You are welcome to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ITunes-3.0-logo-2003.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ITunes-3.0-logo-2003.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Itunes-1.0-logo-2001.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Itunes-1.0-logo-2001.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Itunes-2.0-logo-2002.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Itunes-2.0-logo-2002.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Itunes-3.0-logo-2003.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Itunes-3.0-logo-2003.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Itunes-4.0-logo-2003.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Itunes-4.0-logo-2003.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Itunes-7.0-logo-2007.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Itunes-7.0-logo-2007.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Itunes-10-logo-2010.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Itunes-10-logo-2010.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Songr.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Songr.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For fixing my dumb typo at ~~]]Abbey Road]]~~ Abbey Road! Evan ^{(talk|contribs)} 02:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of music considered the worst, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.If you have an issue with long-standing content in the article that has references supporting its inclusion in this particular article, please go to the article talk page and start a discussion. Otherwise, you are assisting in edit warring, and that's just not acceptable. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 17:45, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of music considered the worst. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You are receiving this notice because of these two edits ([1]; [2]), each 24 hours apart from each other. Because of the timing of these edits removing established content in the article, it appears you might be attempting to game the system. My suggestion is you don't. My next suggestion is the same as with the notice above: please discuss your concerns at the article talk page. But don't edit war and don't attempt to game the system in doing so; it's not worth it. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 18:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 20 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the IPod Nano page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wanna Know My Name? Later. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Songr (screenshot).png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Songr (screenshot).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Songr

The article Songr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) Best hits were passing mentions in CNET's Download.com. No suitable redirect targets.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 22:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Songr logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Songr logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wanna Know My Name? Later. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wanna Know My Name? Later. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your accusation

In response to this, my point was just that it was one revert I made once 9 months ago, which stayed in place for quite some time without dispute, and once it was disputed by you all months later, I didn’t restore it. No WP:3RR or WP:EW violations, which isn’t something you can say about a number of people on the other side of this dispute.

And I know you seem to be flat out incapable of comprehending this, but I have no bias against the Beatles. I don’t think about them much at all. They’re just one of many entries on an article list I’ve passively maintained for the last few years. My stance on inclusion is as simple as “Is there a source for the claim? Yes? Okay, I don’t oppose exclusion. Feel free to rehash your lecture about how critically acclaimed it is, like you haven’t just done it ten times, but my stance is as simple as this - does a source support it - not this bias nonsense. Sergecross73 msg me 00:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the “trimming positive content out of an article that tracks negative reception” is something I’ve done across many entries at the music and video game article lists. Youre free to philosophically disagree, but it comes from my interpretation of article scope, not a bias against the Beatles or any other subjects. It’s not just a Beatles thing. Sergecross73 msg me 00:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert, 9 months ago, was completely against WP:BIAS and WP:NPOV. Even if the article is about the negative reception, a neutral article should include positive reception if it's the case. Since many, many outlets have named Pepper as one of the best albums ever made, I don't see why it shouldn't be included. It gives the article a more neutral look, and the reader can know the full information.

Also, even if nobody objected it, I will. I will always object what I don't agree of - specially if it goes against Wikipedia's rules, which I have been following for 14 years, and apparently you haven't.

Also, you're free to give me an example of a video game that has been declared one of the best of all time, but appears in List of video games notable for negative reception, and any positive thing said about such video game is deleted by you. That's right. It doesn't exist. It's like adding Super Mario 64, Ocarina of Time or Last of Us to that list. All of those games were considered the best, and adding it to such list would be insane, even if there are one or two sources that say that those are the worst games ever. It's ridiculous.

And by the way, if you're treating the articles the same, that means you delete any positive blurb about a video game in that list. However, just as an example, Shaq Fu (1994) contains: "Buchanan acknowledged some positive aspects of Shaq Fu, such as its graphics and animation, its non-linear story progression, and its "charming" simplicity in comparison to other major fighting game franchises such as Soul and Virtua Fighter". If you'd treat the article the same, you would have deleted it. But you didn't. But of course, you did with Pepper.

Even if you have no bias - this has been all wrong, specially coming from a Wikipedia admin. WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ] 15:16, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- - I stopped maintaining the video game equivalent list when another few experienced editors in the video game field took it over a year or so back, so I can't comment on its current state, but rest assured, exactly like I said, I removed positive reception from it too, and much like with the Beatles, I have no history of adding anti-South Park sentiments to Wikipedia either. Like with the Beatles, I am indifferent to South Park as well. And as I've already said, and you've conveniently ignored because it doesn't help your narrative, I've removed positive information from other musical artists as well on the music list, such as info about Richard Harris.
  - I can't say I've ever seen any reliable sources directly assert that Super Mario 64 or Ocarina of Time be the worst game, so that's not really a good analogy. Its never come up or been discussed, to my memory, so there's no comparison point as to how it was handled.
  - Like I said, feel free to disagree on my interpretation of the article's scope, but I've explained my stance and rationale, so accusations of bias are WP:AGF and WP:ASPERSION violations at this point. I'm sorry if you can't bring yourself to at least understand a viewpoint contrary to your own. You don't have to agree with me. You don't even have to understand technically. But you've gotta stop with these unfounded accusations on motivation. Sergecross73 msg me 18:19, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conveniently, you removed an unsourced statement about the the South Park game in the article, 4 months ago. That has nothing to do with what I said. I said about that if you treated the lists equally, you would remove the blurb about the positive reception of Shaq Fu in the List of video games notable for negative reception, which still remains.

My accusations about you not following WP:NPOV and WP:BIAS are clear as water. It's obvious you can't comprehend the idea that if an album got 100 good reviews, but 2 bad ones, it shouldn't be in an article about the music considered the worst. Want me to enumerate again all the Wikipedia rules that breaks? Or are you going to say that, again, I just randomly link to those articles (which of course you don't care to follow)? WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ] 20:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just told you, I stopped maintaining/editing the video games list over a year ago. Re-check the link above. I didn't remove it 4 months ago, I removed it 16 months ago. That was my most recent edit there. You can't blame me for the state of that article right now. I don't believe the Shaq Fu content was there back when I maintained it, but if it was, then the only reason I didn't remove it was because I didn't see it. (That list is massive, and I frequently noticed errors I hadn't noticed prior, as I did far more trimming than actual writing of the content.)

Anyways, I'll stop you right there. Your understanding of policy is abysmal, I don't need you "informing" me any further. As if your WP:IDHT attitude wasn't clear enough in these recent months, digging through the page history, I just realized that you've obsessing over that entry on the music article since at least 2014. Yikes. Clearly this is a lost cause. Sergecross73 msg me 20:36, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Goes for you as well. See you around. WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ] 20:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Inclusion of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band on List of music considered the worst and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 04:16, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sergecross73 msg me 17:58, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you, Serge. Rjrya395 (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just want to say: keep up the good fight. It is so embarrassing how anal they are about removing one album that was most likely added there by some troll. Rjrya395 (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, remember to WP:BECIVIL. I've checked your edits and you're right - they were sockets from a troll account. I hope to start the RFC so all of this clears up. WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ] 14:32, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<font face="Verdana">[[User:Wanna Know My Name? Later|WKMN? Later]] </font><font face="Tahoma" size="1">[ [[User talk:Wanna Know My Name? Later|Let's talk]] ]</font>

: WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ]

to

<span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Wanna Know My Name? Later|WKMN? Later]] </span><span style="font-family:Tahoma; font-size:x-small">[ [[User talk:Wanna Know My Name? Later|Let's talk]] ]</span>

: WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ]

—Anomalocaris (talk) 06:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! WKMN? Later [ Let's talk ] 04:28, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Ecuador medical cases chart

I'm removing the |divisor=150. My intention is to make sure that Ecuador follows the rest of the templates we have. (especially in countries with large cases) With this message, i wish you can accept my edit. SMB99thx_{this might be ugly} 07:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BvS dream

Hello, Wanna Know My Name? Later. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Dead Is Dead, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. The article was redirected after having been tagged since 2017. If you wish to restore it, please add some substantive real-world content with sourcing to justify a standalone article. DonIago (talk) 20:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]