User talk:Walkurax

Dutch

Hallo Walkurax!

Ik heb een verzoekje, zou je zo vriendelijk willen zijn om op het artikel List of African Studies Journals M-Z een andere manier te vinden om aan te geven of de fulltext wel of niet restricted is dan met die kleurtjes (groen en rood)?

Het gebruik van die kleurtjes heeft namelijk 2 nadelen, visueel gehandicapten en kleurenblinden hebben er weinig aan en het is gebruikelijk dat rode links naar niet bestaande artikelen verwijzen en blauwe naar bestaande.

Kan jij een andere manier bedenken om dit verschil duidelijk te maken zonder gebruik te maken van kleurtjes?

Bij voorbaat dank en met vriendelijke groet,

Kwiki (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Kwiki,

bedankt voor de tip. Ik zal naar een oplossing zoeken, kan wel even duren vanwege andere prioriteiten.

Groetjes,

Walkurax

17 May 2009

Africa education review

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Africa education review, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://library.georgetown.edu/newjour/a/msg04283.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Various African journals

I moved most of them so that they use capital letters for the titles. They could do with some incoming links though. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you actually read the above? How many of your articles created after the above message have been moved by someone else? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 12:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the subject of these journals: I just prodded one (see below), but most of those articles do not seem to indicate any notability. This is often problematic for scientific journals (very few articles are written about scientific journals), but there should be at least a minimal indication of why these journals are notable. Some guidance will be appreciated, I really would hate to go for wholesale prodding (or AfD if the prods would be removed), so sources are more than welcome. --Crusio (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Oral Health

The article African Journal of Oral Health has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently non-notable journal. As far as I can see from their website, only one issue was ever published, dated 2004.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 22:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Acta Theologica

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Acta Theologica, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Acta theologica. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

African Anthropology

My bad, I jumped the gun on the rollback. - XXX antiuser 07:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

African Studies Bulletin (0568-1537)

Hello Walkurax. An editor failed to understand the ISSN in the title for disambiguation, and moved (renamed) it to African Studies Bulletin. He has nominated the automatically created redirect for deletion. Please join the discussion at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 August 10#African Studies Bulletin (0568-1537). Specifically, please tell us if you are planning on creating African Studies Bulletin (0024-0249) and a disambiguation page? -- Thinking of England (talk) 16:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ADEA Newsletter

The article ADEA Newsletter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable newsletter which does not even have an ISSN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 10:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AERC Newsletter

The article AERC Newsletter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable newsletter which does not even have an ISSN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 10:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Africentr@lemédias : lettre d'information sur le pluralisme des médias

The article Africentr@lemédias : lettre d'information sur le pluralisme des médias has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal which does not even have an ISSN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Studies Center Newsletter

The article African Studies Center Newsletter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable newsletter which does not even have an ISSN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 10:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Applied Zoology and Environmental Biology

The article African Journal of Applied Zoology and Environmental Biology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Journal seems to be moribund. Journal web site is a dead link. The last issue listed on the AJOL site dates from 2005. Journal seems not to have been included in important databases and therefore not notable from a historical point of view either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 15:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Africa Book Centre Review

The article Africa Book Centre Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable catalog, not published since 2004. No indication of notability. Does not even have an ISSN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

advice

I'm very interested in getting all academic journals that might meet our notability standards into Wikipedia, but some of the ones you are entering have serious problems.

If it does not have an ISSN, it will almost certainly not be considered an notable publication
If it has not actually published any significant number of articles, it will similarly not be considered notable, at least not yet
Unless it is indexed in standard international indexes for the subject, it probably will not be considered notable
Online journals without a print presence are often started on the most sketchy basis, and tend to be looked at rather skeptically.

If I can give you any help with list, let me know. DGG ( talk ) 02:20, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Afra Newsletter

A tag has been placed on Afra Newsletter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crusio (talk) 11:36, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Societies

The article African Societies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, only 4 issues ever published in 2003 and 2004, moribund since then. Does not even have an ISSN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 13:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Sociological Review

The article African Sociological Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, journal appeared irregularly from 1997 to 2005, moribund since then.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 14:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Renaissance (journal)

The article African Renaissance (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Rather recent journal, without even an ISSN. No indication that this might pass WP:Notability (academic journals).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 13:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African-American Archaeology Newsletter

The article African-American Archaeology Newsletter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently moribund newsletter. No indication that any of the criteria of WP:Notability (academic journals) is met. Article basically exists only of the infobox ("references" is not a reference, external link is in infobox, section "general information on online edition" also repeats infobox and should be removed anyway.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 13:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Africa Review of Books

The article Africa Review of Books has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Rather recent journal without any indication of notability. Does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 15:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Journal of Southern African studies

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Journal of Southern African studies, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/carfax/03057070.html. As a copyright violation, Journal of Southern African studies appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Journal of Southern African studies has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Journal of Southern African studies and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Journal of Southern African studies with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Journal of Southern African studies.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Svick (talk) 21:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Critical African studies

The article Critical African studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recently established journal with just 2 issues published yet. Cannot possibly be notable at this point, article creation premature. Does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 14:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Afrikanistik online

The article Afrikanistik online has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Afrikanistik online – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 14:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Urology

The article African Journal of Urology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
African Journal of Urology – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 19:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Farm Child and Youth Development

The article African Journal of Farm Child and Youth Development has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
African Journal of Farm Child and Youth Development – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 05:05, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology and Sport Facilitation

The article African Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology and Sport Facilitation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
African Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology and Sport Facilitation – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 05:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology

The article African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 05:14, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Africa Update

The article Africa Update has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable newsletter, does not even have an ISSN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 17:56, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Leaders State of Africa Report

The article African Leaders State of Africa Report has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to be an academic journal, but in any case, no sources, doesn't seem to be notable, does not meet WP:Notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 18:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

African journals

Hi, I am not sure whether you are still around or whether you have left, but I have been spending hours and hours cleaning up the mess you made on African journals. Next time you create an article, please first get familiar with what such articles should contain, how they should be properly categorized, the proper layout, and, above all, WP:Notability. Most of the articles that you created was at incorrect titles, for journals/magazines that have hardly or no notability at all. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh, but after hours of wading through this stuff, I am a bit fed up... --Crusio (talk) 18:56, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Africa-live.de – das Afrika-Portal

The article Africa-live.de – das Afrika-Portal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Publication of unclear status. Does not seem to be an academic journal, but lacks even an ISSN, even though there is a print version. Does not seem to have made much of an impact, no evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Oral Health Sciences

The article African Journal of Oral Health Sciences has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
African Journal of Oral Health Sciences – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 15:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Information and Communication Technology

The article African Journal of Information and Communication Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
African Journal of Information and Communication Technology – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 21:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Africanist News and Views

The article Africanist News and Views has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Magazine that was published only for a few years (1968-1973). 7 issues are available online, it is unclear whether this is only a selection or whether these are all issues ever published. In any case, there is no indication of notability and this does not meet WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 15:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of Religion in Africa

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Journal of Religion in Africa, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://fsearch-sandbox.jstor.org/journals/00224200.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Journal of Religion in Africa

A tag has been placed on Journal of Religion in Africa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 11:00, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Livestock Extension

The article African Journal of Livestock Extension has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal, not indexed anywhere. Does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 12:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Paediatric Surgery

The article African Journal of Paediatric Surgery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the Notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 08:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Human Rights Newsletter

The article African Human Rights Newsletter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of any notability at all.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 13:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Journal of African History

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Journal of African History, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublicationInfo?journalCode=jafricanhistory, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Journal of African History and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Journal of African History, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Journal of African History with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Journal of African History. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Journal of African History saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Kajervi (talk) 18:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Agricultural Research

The article African Journal of Agricultural Research has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources, not listed in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WPGNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 09:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Environmental Assessment and Management

The article African Journal of Environmental Assessment and Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. No independent sources, not listed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Food and Nutritional Security

The article African Journal of Food and Nutritional Security has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Both Bioline and AJOL indicate only 1 issue was ever published. Not indexed in any major selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Business Management

The article African Journal of Business Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not included (any more?) in any selective database, no independent sources. Note that publisher is on Beall's list of predatory open access publishers. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Finance and Management

The article African Journal of Finance and Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently moribund journal, not indexed in any selective database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Science and Technology

The article African Journal of Science and Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal, tagged for notability since 2009. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review

The article Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal (tagged for notability since 2010). Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nordic Journal of African Studies

The article Nordic Journal of African Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of African Journal of Biotechnology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article African Journal of Biotechnology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Journal of Biotechnology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 13:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

African Philosophy (1369-6823) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect African Philosophy (1369-6823). Since you had some involvement with the African Philosophy (1369-6823) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Research Review

The article African Research Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources, not indexed anywhere. Only claim to fame is having been included on Beall's list. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 14:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Africa Education Review

The article Africa Education Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:55, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of International Affairs

The article African Journal of International Affairs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences

The article African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies

The article African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not indexed anywhere selective, no evidence of general notability. Affiliated ORG is a red link with no promising sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 23:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Politeia (journal) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Politeia (journal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politeia (journal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]