User talk:Vtchjhn

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Vtchjhn! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 16:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia beginners wanted for user testing

Wikimedia Deutschland is looking for beginner editors for user testing! We are working on some changes that may affect the editing experience, and we want to make sure that our changes don't make things more difficult for beginners. If you made less than 100 edits, we would love to hear from you! More information and a signup: https://greatquestion.co/wikimediadeutschland/4oADuQpx/apply. --Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 10:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC) PS: This is a one-time message to selected beginner editors. You won't get any further notifications if you're not interested.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarah Zapata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corpus Christi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alejandro Stock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clarel Neme moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Clarel Neme. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clarel Neme (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What is needed to establish notability per WP criteria for artists is significant coverage in verifiable reliable sources (newspapers, books, magazines) that are fully independent from the person themselves. The one museum collection is a good source, if there are other works in permanent museum or national gallery collections please add them, as this will help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clarel Neme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vtchjhn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Netherzone (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clarel Neme (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuicoleJR was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet NBIO or NARTIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clarel Neme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QuicoleJR (talk) 19:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your biographies of Uruguayan artists

Thank you, Vtchjhn, for creating many biographies of Uruguayan artists over the past three months. Keep up the good work.--Ipigott (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to contribute and will continue working on more biographies. Thanks for your support! Vtchjhn (talk) 09:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advert warning

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 16:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I appreciate your feedback. The article I contributed was a translation of a Spanish one, which indeed contained certain phrases that may have appeared promotional. I will take your suggestions into account and rewrite the article tomorrow, ensuring it fully adheres to Wikipedia's neutrality policy.

Thanks again! Vtchjhn (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Deb (talk) 16:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pilar González (artist)

Hello, Vtchjhn

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Pilar González (artist), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @TheLongTone:,

Thank you for your message and for reaching out! I have now added reliable references to the article Pilar González (artist). They verify the artist’s biography, career, and awards.

Please let me know if any improvements or additional sources are needed. I appreciate your help!

Vtchjhn (talk) 15:31, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]