Jump to content

User talk:Volkslemans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Volkslemans, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Olympus Mons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Wikipedia:Tiberius Claudius Cogidubnus. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  13:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Golden Dawn (political party) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Seven Wonders of the Ancient World has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hanging Gardens of Babylon. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hanging Gardens of Babylon was changed by Volkslemans (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894627 on 2016-03-22T09:08:12+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lighthouse of Alexandria, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lighthouse of Alexandria was changed by Volkslemans (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96382 on 2016-03-22T09:12:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Volkslemans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand that vandalism is the bane of an open community run site like Wikipedia and I originally thought that I was being funny but I know understand I was just stupid, I believe that in the future I will be able to make constructive edits to Wikipedia and therefore I should be unblocked. I have learnt my lesson

Decline reason:

Your first four edits, made last year, were perfectly acceptable. You then took a break from editing between October last year and February this year, since when every single one of your edits has been a vandalism, frequently very offensive vandalism. Please explain this odd behaviour, and also tell us what, if unblocked, you want to write about. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Volkslemans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have two words to explain my inappropriate behaviour. Peer Pressure. I have since talked to my 'friend' Sheila and she said that she wouldn't persuade me to do it any more. She said that if I didn't do something funny soon I'd be gay and she'd fill my dorm with dildos. She said she would never actually do it. So I forgave her, we then got it on. It was gr8 m8. Anyway I will never do this again, I promise. :D Volkslemans (talk) 12:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declined, talk page access revoked. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Volkslemans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21958 was submitted on Jul 03, 2018 12:20:10. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Volkslemans&oldid=1033998540"