User talk:VolaciousEditor

Welcome!

Hello, Wrightie99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 10:36, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orwell Lady (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orwell Lady and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! VolaciousEditor, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stronger sourcing needed at Draft:Orwell Lady

See new comments at top of draft: Draft:Orwell Lady. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orwell Lady has been accepted

Orwell Lady, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 10:35, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mill (Ipswich) has been accepted

The Mill (Ipswich), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Huon (talk) 21:40, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Endeavour House has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Endeavour House. Thanks! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Endeavour House has been accepted

Endeavour House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I couldn't help on IRC earlier, but looking at the code, the infobox picture code has a couple of errors.

The code as it currently stands needs to be changed from image = File:Endeavour_House,_home_of_Suffolk_County_Council_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1305044.jpg. to image = Endeavour_House,_home_of_Suffolk_County_Council_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1305044.jpg

Most (but not all) infoboxes don't need the File: at the start of the image name, image files used to be named Image:xyz.jpg but this was changed a few years ago to the current File:xyz.jpg scheme, but in order to not break infoboxes then (and in the future), they were all changed to not need either Image: or File: at the start of the file name. There's also a trailing period/full stop after jpg which upsets the infobox and stops the image from displaying. There's 25 million or so images, videos, music files and other documents, so unfortunately it's necessary to be completely accurate with names, full stops and even capitalisation and file extension, hopefully as the site gets more advanced, these sorts of errors will be more easily flagged up and made easier to rectify. Cheers, Nick (talk) 12:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, VolaciousEditor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Russell Road (Ipswich) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Road with [[Endeavour House]] pictured on the right and [[Grafton House]] pictured on the left]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:30, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, VolaciousEditor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by w.carter-Talk 20:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 01:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ipswich Town Hall (England), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grade 2 and King John. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wrightie99

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would love to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete. Thanks!

https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85 Gabrielm199 (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I taken the survey. Wrightie99 (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Endeavour House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NHS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the survey but said no to the interview, just wondered what the interview would be as I'm happy to help. Wrightie99 (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Regent (City Creek), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LEED. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, VolaciousEditor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 19:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marriott Downtown at City Creek Hotel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marriott Downtown at City Creek Hotel, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 20:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moved it to User:Wrightie99/Marriott Downtown at City Creek Hotel while you're working on it. Bazj (talk) 21:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Privileges

Hi, having read and (sort of) answered your question at the Teahouse, I'm wondering if you might be thinking that experienced editors get things that facilitates making articles or something. If that is the case there are things that almost any editor can use to make the editing simpler, those are called scripts. Have you ever heard of those? They are small additions that gives you extra tools for editing or for detecting errors in texts. You don't need to be a tech-wiz to install or use them and new users usually add them one at the time to get to know them before moving on to the next. If you are interested in this, just give me a ping. Best, w.carter-Talk 22:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to butt in, but since I was watching this talk page for the moment... ProveIt and HotCat (set them on Special:Preferences) are two really helpful ones for editing. I wouldn't be without them. And while you're there, setting "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" is good (nobody tells you when you're new that a couple of years down the line, when you look at becoming an Admin, people get really upset about your percentage of edits without edit summaries). Bazj (talk) 22:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good "butting in" and good sugestions Bazj.

Thanks for adding them! Cheers, w.carter-Talk 22:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, VolaciousEditor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by LethalFlower^Talk/Reply 03:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Proposed deletion of 10 Reavell Place

The article 10 Reavell Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unimportant 12 story building

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St Francis Court

The article St Francis Court has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unimportant small apartment building�

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St Francis Court for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St Francis Court is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Francis Court until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14:56:45, 29 May 2015 review of submission by 141.20.27.42

141.20.27.42 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Apache Flink (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Wrightie99, thanks for your review. I was woundering how I can improve the article about Apache Flink further. The first reviewer told me, that the new references I added should be enough; you disagree obviously. There are many blog post about the system that might be used. However, I am not sure if those source are considered reliable and independent (from a Wikipedia point of view). Apacha Flink is mainly developed by a start-up company called "dataArtisans" and their blog is full of articles of course: http://data-artisans.com/blog.html

There are also a few other blog post from Apache Flink commiters on various web site. Many of them a "guest posts". I am not sure if those can be considert "independent third party" or not?

Additionally, many slides from talks about Apache Flink are availalbe online at slideshare.net. Could those be used? (http://www.slideshare.net/search/slideshow?searchfrom=header&q=apache+flink&ud=any&ft=all&lang=**&sort=)

I could also referecne a bunch of research papers published at international conference about the original "Stratosphere" research project. As Flink originates from Stratophere, those could be valid references, too. (From my point of view.)

It would be awesome, if you could provide some hints, what sources I suggested you condider good, in order to improve the article's notability. Thanks in advance! :) 141.20.27.42 (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for the question. Regarding the article Apache Flink I think some small edits will allow for the article to be accepted in no time. Firstly blogs are not usually allowed as they are not reliable because anyone can start one and write anything. Try and find out where they got the information. Blogs can sometimes be allowed as a reference if the person who wrote the blog is 'notable'. I found a reference concerning the subject, http://www.infoworld.com/article/2919602/hadoop/flink-hadoops-new-contender-for-mapreduce-spark.html. Finally you have appeared to reference the title above the info box, this is not needed. Also make sure to reference the opening paragraphs above the contents section. hope this helps Wrightie99 (talk) 16:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note I forgot to answer your quetion about the slide shows. They can 'ONLY' be used if you prove the creator in notable and reliable. I have never seen a slide show used as a reference but if you can prove the reliability, I'm sure it will be accepted. Finally research papers are valid if they are from a notable subject, just make sure you reference them in the correct format.

file upload

Just to note that I have uploaded c:File:The_AXA_building_(geograph_2689453).jpg from [1], as you were trying to do in the help channel. Mdann52 (talk) 18:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Hello, apparently there's a tool to quickly import images from Geograph.co.uk to the Wikimedia Commons: Geograph-to-Commons. User:Mdann52 used that to upload the image you asked about on IRC; it's now at File:The AXA building (geograph 2689453).jpg. Huon (talk) 18:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, VolaciousEditor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Greyfriars Development

Hello, VolaciousEditor. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Greyfriars Development".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Neptune Marina

Hello, VolaciousEditor. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Neptune Marina".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 12:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, VolaciousEditor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zakk Sandler

Hello, VolaciousEditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zakk Sandler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]