User talk:Vipgirlua

July 2023

Hello, I'm Framawiki. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Transfiguration Cathedral in Odesa, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 00:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fashion illustration, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The link removed have been not serious and another not free . First link was promoted service online to draw Vipgirlua (talk) 12:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fashion illustration, you may be blocked from editing. ToadetteEdit ^(chat)/_(logs) 15:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pls stop 🛑 put fake info this link https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/15/fashion/fashion-illustration-exhibitions.html n 6 not free !!! People have to pay to read I guess you not volontaire and have interest payant for this artist Vipgirlua (talk) 15:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

useless) arguing bees with flies about honey that understand shit Vipgirlua (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s you Vandalism with fake info !! Vipgirlua (talk) 15:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please seevWP:PAYWALL. The mere fact that a source is paywalled does not mean it cannot be used. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fashion illustration. PriusGod (talk) 15:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Blocking policy U propose link payant not possible to read for all users for FREE it’s hors mission Wikipedia u not right!!! Vipgirlua (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links used as references have no obligation to be free to readers. References, as long as they're reliable, can come from almost anywhere. If it's hidden behind a paywall then so be it. No different to being inside a book that you'd need to buy. There is no obligation to provide you with easy access to it, just to inform you what it is. Canterbury Tail talk 16:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books has strong reputation compare nyt newspaper Or u can pay 2000 dol to be published in Forbes . For example I now some who can do it for money in the Forbes Vipgirlua (talk) 16:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 16:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

?? Vipgirlua (talk) 16:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read our policies on edit warring and paid sources, then feel free to appeal your block. A source being paid does not prohibit it from being used as a citation, it is not other users' responsibility to research and verify your uncited edits, and trying to force your position through will only get you blocked. It's a good thing to feel passionately about something and want to share it with the world, but you also need to work within the boundaries set by our community. PriusGod (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

U not right pls read about Drouot Vipgirlua (talk) 16:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Previous members Wikipedia:Disruptive editing Vipgirlua (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to source your edits. PhilKnight (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight: Can you please retract the talk page access of this person? They clearly don't seem to be using it productively. Din oz1 (chat?) (he/him) 16:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give them a bit more time to see if they want to post an unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]