User talk:Vinod2608

AfC notification: Draft:Vijay Shankar Pandey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vijay Shankar Pandey. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon, Thanks for your comments. I feel the article was rejected because its type was charged from draft to article as per the rejection comments. There are enough references cited from leading newspaper publications on the subject. If you can suggest some improvements that can be made than it would be very helpful. For now I have resubmitted the draft. As advised by you, I have also posted in teahouse for feedback for improvement. Thanks again for your comment. Vinod2608 (talk) 15:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

I have not reviewed the article in detail. The history of the article is that you first created it in article space, and it was then moved back to draft space, and you then moved it unilaterally to article space after adding references. It would have been better if you had waited for another reviewer to review it and see if it could be accepted and moved to article space. User:Bearcat then moved it back to draft space again. You should either discuss it with User:Bearcat or other neutral editors, or wait for a review, rather than moving it back to article space. I see that you say that you are asking at the Teahouse. That is a good idea.

Also, it is difficult to have a discussion with you on your talk page because you remove posts from your talk page. That is permitted but discouraged, and makes discussion difficult, so any further discussion can be at the Teahouse or somewhere else. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that even if you add references to the article, you still must resubmit the draft for assessment by an AFC reviewer, and are not entitled to just immediately move the page into mainspace yourself. Not all possible sources out there are necessarily always notability-building sources, and people often erroneously think that just adding one or two bad sources (like blogs, or the person's own social networking profiles) is all they have to do — so regardless of how well you think you've done at bolstering his notability with better sources, an AFC reviewer still has to assess whether you've really done as well as you think you have. So when you're improving a draft that's previously been rejected, your next step after that is not "move the page yourself", it is "resubmit to AFC for another kick at the review can". Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Robert McClenon and Bearcat. I'm new here and am learning. After I moved the draft to article, there was a message on top page about pending review so I thought it was fine. After it was moved back to draft state, I realised my previous account was not correct. Also I cleaned my talk page because other I feel something action pending with me. I'll not clean it going forward. Is there a way to archive them? Lastly thanks once again for your explanations and help. Much appreciated. Vinod2608 (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Advait.kansal per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Advait.kansal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijay Shankar Pandey (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vijay Shankar Pandey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vijay Shankar Pandey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinod2608! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]