User talk:VictorianMutant/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:VictorianMutant. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Re:

Hello, VictorianMutant. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tiderolls 05:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

In looking over your contributions I think I owe you a fuller explanation. I am using a tool that allows for faster reverting. I thought you were also using the software or I wouldn't have given you as flippant a response. My apologies. If you want to continue vandal-scrubbing, build up a bit more manual edits and a bit more time at the task and I'd be glad to change your user rights so that you would be able to make use of this tool. Anyway, it's an idea. Regards Tiderolls 05:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good. I haven't spent a lot of time (yet) actively seeking vandals- spend more time copy-editing. I sometimes find vandalism that way: seems like many vandals are bad spellers, too. VictorianMutant (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

We're glad to have your help regardless of what task(s) you choose. Feel free to message me if you should have any questions or concerns. Tiderolls 05:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:1893secondcourthouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:1893secondcourthouse.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Brevard County

Thanks for the heads up. Much improved.

You do realize, don't you, that the article was too long to start with? Will need to be forked to a new article and summarized in the main article, once it stabilizes. We will probably be the first county article to have it's own history!!! Incredible!

I best discuss the remainder of items on the article discussion page, for permanence and visibility. Student7 (talk) 03:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Would you like to construct a "History of Brevard County" (new article). You would get "credit" for that, such as it is! I will help if you do. If not, I will do it. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

I could try to do it in the next few days. VictorianMutant (talk) 02:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Brevard County (more)

Thank you so much for the very thoughtful heads-up. My main interest in this article was cleaning up the Film and TV section. It looks like you have added a lot of great content; great work! RadioBroadcast (talk) 03:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Patrolling

I see from your userpage that you find it frustrating trying to revert vandalism because others have tools you don't. Have you ever seen Special:Contributions/newbies? It's a good place to find vandalism by noobs, and has a lot less traffic. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I vaguely knew there was a changes for newbies page, but didn't know where to find it. I think somehow you misunderstood my feelings towards vandalism fighting though. If I stop vandalism fighting because others are regularly "beating me" in reverting vandals, it's not because I'm frustrated; it's because I assume the vandal fighter to vandal ratio is high so I go "where I am needed" more. I do think it's a good thing when lots of people are fighting vandals- it means I can go back to encyclopedia building instead of vandal fighting. If needed though, I do have twinkle... VictorianMutant (talk) 20:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Even better - as you point out, there are a lot of vandal fighting editors, and not enough adding quality content. Have fun! 69.181.249.92 (talk) 03:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Was about to ask why you haven't registered yet, but then saw your talk page. I actually contributed for the longest time as an IP, but got sick of overzealous people assuming bad faith just because I was an IP. Wondered what would happen if I nominated "69.181.249.92" for RfA? VictorianMutant (talk) 09:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review

Thank you so very much for your review! Your positive comments show me that people actually do care and appreciate my contributions to Wikipedia, thank you again! CTJF83 chat 15:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the opportunity. I actually felt a bit "unworthy" to review an editor with as much experience as you. After 34,000 edits, I hope I'll have as many GA's under my belt as you do. VictorianMutant (talk) 18:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

If you need any help, feel free to ask me! :) CTJF83 chat 20:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I might take you up on the offer soon. VictorianMutant (talk) 20:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the editor review

Hello, VictorianMutant. It's not late, so don't worry about that. I've just set that up to get comments from other people and I didn't put any timeframe on when it should be done. Again, thanks heaps for your time and for your comments. Cheers Sp33dyphil ^(Talk) ^{(Contributions)}^{(Feed back needed @ Talk page)} 00:19, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

If you do notice, my signature has a request at the end asking others for comments on my contributions. So far, no-one seemed to notice, so I went to ER.

Editor Review

Thank you so much for the editor review, I will take what you said to heart and truly work on it. I am going to deploy a bot then work on articles. Thank you SO much. Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 01:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome.VictorianMutant (talk) 01:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

....for the Editor Review. I had no intention of running for admin until at least next March as I have my Bar Mitzva coming up in February. At the beginning when I did that RfA I was just overly excited. It was extremely stupid and in the long run hasn't helped me in any way. With the edits to mainspace, I think I'll do that. It'll take me a while to get 1000 mainspace if I'm only on weekends I think. I've contributed a little to GoCE and think I'll continue that. Thanks very¹⁰⁰⁰ much for the Review and the good advice. Cheers, Mr. R00t ^Talk 14:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

You are a wise man... if you need any help in finding things to work on in mainspace, let me know. Thanks, VictorianMutant (talk) 19:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

For your work at Editor review

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your reviews of other editors. You're exactly the type of person we need there - dedicated, honest, and many other things =D Netalarm^talk 03:48, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Hmm... I find it amusing that it took me three tries to do that. I guess it's obvious that you're the first person I've given a barnstar to =P. Now I just need to figure out how to give barnstars... Netalarm^talk 03:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I needed that... bad day and that picked up my spirits a lot. BTW, I like the color scheme of your user page- I don't think you should change it. VictorianMutant (talk) 04:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Crap! You beat me! Well yeah, VM, your editor reviews are short and sweet. Makes me want to have one myself... Buggie111 (talk) 02:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I try to be positive, because I hate being hard on people who ask for constructive criticism. I think the purpose of an editor review is to encourage the editor, not discourage them to the point where they might leave the project. VictorianMutant (talk) 04:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for the review you left me. I greatly appreciate it. You made excellent points about why I should work in the mainspace. I don't think my content writing skills are great, and in my opinion, one should stick to what they excel at. However, like I said, you made excellent points, and who knows? You just might see an article by me. It doesn't have to be perfect right off the bat, right? So thank you again, you're comments are greatly appreciated, and I will keep them in mind, for sure. Just one thing though. Who says my userpage isn't pretty? Kidding, I know. It's an eyesore. :P M J ₉ ₄ 00:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Rollback granted

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I will put it to good use. VictorianMutant (talk) 07:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Puzzled

Hi, I happened to notice this on User talk:TYelliot#Welcome to User:LyingEyes, and I'm a bit puzzled about this warning on a new user's LyingEyes (talk · contribs)) talk page who's only contributions were two innocent edits on his own userpage and talkpage. ~~Could it be that you accidentally made a mistake?~~ I have removed the warning on the user's talk page, which do not resort under wp:BLP. Please also have look at wp:TPG: a user is entitled to write this in his own user space. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 10:06, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Or perhaps the user created a new page attacking someone, added more attacks, and then it was tagged for speedy deletion and deleted by an admin causing it to not show up in the user's contributions? VictorianMutant (talk) 10:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't these edits be struck in the user contribution list then? DVdm (talk) 10:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Not if it is BLP, I think- I don't see the edit for the tag I placed on the article in my contribs. See deletion log (09:32, 25 September 2010 JohnCD (talk | contribs) deleted "Martin Sludden" ‎ (G10: Attack page or negative unsourced BLP). Also see deleted edits here VictorianMutant (talk) 10:24, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Anyway, I reverted back to my version of the user talk page (with the legitimate warning) not because I am playing tit for tat, but simply because if they do it again... they can be warned at an appropriate level instead of as a first time violation. VictorianMutant (talk) 11:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, that article was deleted. On the user's contribution list there is no visible trace of this kind of abuse anywhere, but this tool provides the evidence. I notice that you re-inserted the warning on the talk page. Thanks, and also for the pointer to the tool. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 11:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

WikiThanks

Thank you for the barnstar. I dream of horses @ 19:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. I had give you something 'cause I see you everywhere and you beat me at least 3 times to reverting vandalism last night. VictorianMutant (talk) 21:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Do you do straight RC patrol, or do you use something like I use? (Vandal fighter) --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 21:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I have been using twinkle, but I just got rollback and am just now starting to get used to huggle. VictorianMutant (talk) 21:59, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:BHS jackets.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BHS jackets.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Fixed... VictorianMutant (talk) 00:46, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Editor review

I'd like to thank you for your kind review of my Wikipedia work. --Itemirus^{Message me!} 22:05, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. VictorianMutant (talk) 00:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Earthcore

Thanks; I had actually filed an AIV report earlier, but he did briefly move it to the talkpage. It's getting a bit annoying now... I wouldn't have bothered, except that this seems to be a perpetual issue on that article. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 07:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

I didn't notice the discussion on the talk page until after I reported. I think article should be semi-protected... looks like this has been long term. VictorianMutant (talk)

I'll file an RFPP, but that IP still needs to be blocked. Ordinarily I'm very careful to avoid edit warring, but I invoked IAR due to the article's history. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 07:33, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Not sure how effective a block will be. Apparently their connection uses a dynamic IP. VictorianMutant (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Semi-protection request made; it's my first one, so I probably screwed something up ;). As an aside, AIV is slow tonight; no one seems to be monitoring it. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 07:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Request looks okay to me... VictorianMutant (talk) 07:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks; I mangled my first UAA report, so I'm never sure the first time I do something. Never had to think of using IAR outside of Japanese MoS before, but this seemed like as good a time as any. Thanks for your assistance. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 07:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

welcome. VictorianMutant (talk) 07:45, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review

Thank you for taking the time to review me :). I will take your thoughts into account and will try to build on the places you said I should work on. See you around! --Addi hockey 10 02:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. I hope to see ya around. VictorianMutant (talk) 02:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you so much for your feedback on my editor review. I had kind-of forgotten it. However, I appreciate your input and will try my hardest ( in what spare time i have ) to take into consideration what you said. Again, I definitely appreciate criticism and welcome it. Thanks again. Hope we run into each other sometime, and I would like a list of articles relating to polk county. (polk county chrome = duct tape!). Best wishes, cheers: Petiatil^»Talk 06:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'll keep in touch with you and get ya a list. A good start would be the Lakeland, Florida article 'cause it needs some work. VictorianMutant (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Editor review

Yeah, it's a little dated. I've gone much more CCM/Political over the past few months, and have not updated since then. But your tips are really great, and thanks for taking the time to do it. How do you get more into vandal fighting; I've done some on a much smaller wiki, but attacks there are usually short and the mess is cleaned up in minutes. Toa Nidhiki05 18:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Best way to start is to follow Recent changes. Just go to the "diff" column and compare what was there before with what is there now. It takes a while to get the hang of it, but once you get better (and faster) at it, you'll be able to spot pages which likely have vandalism or "test" edits. Do check out this page and read it and any links and you'll be on your way. VictorianMutant (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

About your editor review .... I found Toa Niodhiki's answers to the opening questions somewhat strange myself, but on further inspection, I saw that those answers were given way back in March and given that tidbit of info ... the answers probably were accurate at the time. BigK HeX (talk) 01:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I stand corrected. I shouldn't have missed such an important detail as that... feel free to TROUT slap me. VictorianMutant (talk) 02:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Since you took the conservative road of assuming good faith, it didn't impact your editor review much, and I found it to be a great review. It's good to know that there are great people such as yourself around to do such careful work! In lieu of a trout, I think this may be more appropriate.... BigK HeX (talk) 02:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm doing Low carb right now so... okay, just one won't hurt. VictorianMutant (talk) 02:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

Hello! Thank you very much for supporting me to keep the page Wikipedia:WikiProject North Korea! I will try to pay more effort in developing that page into a qualified one. -- LS C HIST (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. You should really try to develop the project a little more soon, because even though it may survive this MFD, it's likely to get renominated again soon if there isn't much more done with it. VictorianMutant (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Tim Wakefield

For the record, user 68.84.31.33 appears to be engaged in trivial vandalism in the Satellite Beach, Florida. Student7 (talk) 12:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

~~Okay~~. How are they engaging in "trivial" vandalism? They made two edits: The first was referenced with a citation from Florida Today (don't know why you reverted it- it was spot on). The second listed Tim Wakefield as being from Satellite Beach (which sounds like perhaps original research- maybe he did live there), but even if he was from Melbourne, it's still not blatant vandalism, IMHO. VictorianMutant (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

I missed the referenced item. He has edited in Wakefield before and ignored my complaints. As far as anyone knows, or has researched, Wakefield lived in Melbourne and attended school in Eau Gallie (for sure EG) NOT Satellite Beach. It's just routine vandalism. We get thousands of these a year in the sites I watch. Attributing a wrong city to a sports or musical figure.

I am seeing no references to Wakefield or anyone else. He is linked, of course. He has his own bio which says "Melbourne." If this changes, he will definitely need a cite. But it's vandalism. He won't be able to come up with one. Student7 (talk) 01:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Sometimes determining where an athlete or other celebrity is from is problematic. Take for instance Ray Lewis who is from Polk County Florida. He was born in Bartow, pretty much lived his entire childhood and adolescence in Mulberry, and went to high school in Lakeland (Kathleen High School). I know all these things for a fact because I grew up at the same time he did in Polk County. If I were to add Ray Lewis to the Mulberry article as a famous native, that would be original research, not vandalism. I've not been able to find a source online to back what I know up, so this is original research. If I were to add it anyway(hypothetically) some could come to the conclusion tht it was vandalism, but IMO the bar for vandalism is a lot higher than that. VictorianMutant (talk) 01:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree on what you are saying. It was not vandalism, but original research when it was first added, but it was the second, etc. without any ref or response to previous editors. This happens all the time with local athletes (and one comedian). Kids in every town try to claim him. The first time I can overlook. Subsequent times are clearly for annoyance purposes. Student7 (talk) 01:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

For the record, the kid was "sort of" right. Just wrong city. He lives in Indian Harbour Beach. I've added it there. He finally engaged me on my talk page and we straightened it out. Student7 (talk) 19:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

email

i sent you one of those things Netalarm^talk 03:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Hi VictorianMutant. Yes, I would gladly help you if I can (although I must say I am not the best around to do so, but I would do the best I can). Please avoid modifying other's post, including striking their comments; it is considered a common courtesy to let others strike their own opinion if they considered it resolved (I re-formatted the peer review to this effect). Jappalang (talk) 12:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry still pretty new here- I wasn't sure how to follow up so used someone else's example (which I guess was wrong as well). I didn't mean to step on toes and I apologize if I did. VictorianMutant (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

It is okay. Just add your response below the comment to show the action taken, additional query, or such. Jappalang (talk) 14:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

I am so out of my depth here I really cannot explain. However, many thanks for the message you left me on my talk page. I'm not even sure though if that is the correct talk page for the published version of the article (Council of Irish Genealogical Organisations)! (ALICEWIKI)

How does my article get reviewed so that the box at the top of the page gets removed?

I'm stressed just trying to deal with this. I don't have great IT skills and Wikipedia is generously letting me demonstrate how weak they are! (talk) Alicewiki (talk) 16:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

tb/bs

Hello, VictorianMutant. You have new messages at Ctjf83's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Not sure if you're watching my page or not.... CTJF83 chat 23:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I've finished my review, and posted it on the PR page, any other help for any query please don't hesitate to ask! CTJF83 chat 03:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the barnstar!! It is greatly appreciated!!....You could always give me another one to get me up to 14! :) CTJF83 chat 11:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, VictorianMutant. You have new messages at RobertMfromLI's talk page.
Message added 04:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Much thanks! Replied on my talk page. -R ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 04:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Note

hey, thanks for your great feedback, and also for your helpful words and ideas! appreciate it. feel free to be in touch anytime. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 18:40, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Highland City - List of First Councilmen

I'd like to know more about why you removed my list of the first (and only) councilmen for Highland City (when it was incorporated)? The city was only incorporated for a year or so. I understand that a list of current councilmen might not be encyclopedic, but the very first and only members seem to be an important set of individuals in the history of the (one time) town. Is there a standard of which I am unaware that proscribes such a list, or is this your interpretation? -FloridaIsMyCountry (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

I have rolled-back my edit of Highland City. Looking through the edit history of the article, your edits to Highland City did vastly improve the article, so although I think the table of town officers in 1925 is a little "overkill"... in retrospect, I don't think the table does any harms. Personally. I think if Highland City were incorporated today, then a list of current city officers would be encyclopedic(not in the history section, but in a government section, of course). If it were an article I was actively working on, I would have simply listed the mayor, perhaps the councilmen as well, but used prose rather than a table. As for a standard, I think the table falls under a few of the areas of WP:NOT, but that is open to interpretation. VictorianMutant (talk) 01:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Follow up: I have thought about expanding the Highland City article at some point. Since you seem to be one of the few editors who've contributed positively to the article, I value your feedback and definitely don't want to step on any toes because you are a valued member of the community. I would like to get it up to at least "B" maybe even "GA" status. Don't know how feasible that would be (although Stephens City, Virginia, a town smaller than Highland City made it all the way to featured article), but the article has a lot of potential. I have more thoughts on how to expand it- if you want to help, let me know. Thanks, VictorianMutant^(Talk) 04:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Consecutive vandalism edits

Please try to revert *all* the vandalism edits to a page, not just one of them; I am aware that you need to be careful about that problem when using STiki. See the history at "Christiaan Barnard", particularly your edit at 09:36 and the vandalism at 09:34, 09:30 and 09:23 (UTC). Graham87 14:24, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Usually I am pretty careful about that... sometimes it is hard to tell using STiki. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 14:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Like here for example. I usually check if it looks like a case of likely multiple vandal, but sometimes we all make mistakes. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 14:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Bartow, Florida

No problem! It was fun to review, and I hope I wasn't too harsh ;) Hurricanehink (talk) 15:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Like I said... it was great having four people with experience with FA's who gave their opinions. I needed that and I think that helps the chances of it passing GA substantially. I saw other peer reviews where other people simply said "everything looks okay" and I didn't want that. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 15:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Following up on your suggestions: the history section is now much improved(and more "Bartow-centric" as opposed to general Fl history). I dropped the part about the 2004 hurricanes in the history section as well(since it was mentioned in the climate section anyway). All of your suggestions improved the article. Thanks once again.VictorianMutant^(Talk) 15:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Note: The following message was left on User:RGTRaynor's talk page and deleted without response and is added here for archiving purposes:

Your changes to Silvermoon Drive-In...

contained ~~numerous~~ two errors which I have reverted. Please see the Talk:Silvermoon Drive-in talk page of the article for details. Thanks, VictorianMutant^(Talk) 06:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Actually only two of the three errors were added by you, the third error (about the second theater) was someone else's mistake. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 08:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Queen

My edit wasn't vandalism, and I don't know how you could construe it as such; all I did was clarify that Brian May joined the recording process late, because under the previous wording, it sounded as though he wasn't a part of the album at all. 64.206.62.227 (talk) 07:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Somehow the "vandalism" button on Stiki(the anti-vandal tool I sometimes use) became stuck and reverted about 8 edits in a row. My apologies, your edit was fine. Sorry, VictorianMutant^(Talk) 07:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Bradenton–Sarasota–Venice, Florida Metropolitan Statistical Area; Innerarity Point, Florida; Santa Rosa Island, Florida; Brewster, Florida; Florida State Road 542; Kevin Gilbert (author); 100 Racks; Keydrick Vincent; Maneuverable reentry vehicle; Area code 863; Rainbow River; Moncrieff, Australian Capital Territory; Florida State Road 17; Ridge Community High School; Posner Park; Bambi Meets Godzilla; You Got What It Takes; Polk State College; What You Know bout Me? Part 2

Cleanup: Dennis Hopper; The Hard goodbye (Sin city yarn); Sandwich
Merge: List of Secretaries of State of North Dakota; Ghost Camp; Tonsillitis
Add Sources: Homeland, Florida; Poinciana, Florida; Polk City, Florida
Wikify: Wee Wee Caye Marine Lab; Kentucky Derby 2009 Prep Schedule; The Uncanny X-Men and The New Teen Titans
Expand: Dundee, Florida; History of Pensacola, Florida; Hampton, Arkansas

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Smile!

Hello VictorianMutant, Sabrinamagers has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

This is for giving me a review, and a wonderful one at that! Thank you for spending the time on a newbie like me. I really appreciate it. SabrinaMagers^talk^sign 15:57, 18 03:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

MfD

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject North Korea (2nd nomination) Hello, this is to invite you to a previously held discussion on MfD that had been closed but was recently revealed to be a vote fraud following the discovery of a big sockfarm operated by that particular individual. Appreciate if you could voice your opinion on this matter there. Best. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 13:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

It's raining thanks spam!

Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

THANKS!!!

I wanted to thank you for your kind and encouraging response to my plea for help in writing my article. Sorry it took so long for me to discover it, I'm pretty Wikipedia ignorant. Your advice was constructive and well received. I appreciate it very much and now know what I need to do differently. When I make updates, might I ask you to look at it again?

Echo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emb777 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Sunshine!

		Sunshine!
		Hello VictorianMutant! SabrinaMagers^talk^sign 15:57, 18 has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding `{{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}}` to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! SabrinaMagers^talk^sign 15:57, 18 03:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank youVictorianMutant^(Talk) 16:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive!

Discussions are underway to elect our inaugural group of GOCE Coordinators. Guild members and Drive participants are invited to have a look at the Coordinators page and join the discussion on its associated talk page.

We have reached the midway point in our backlog elimination drive, so here is an update.

Participation report — The November drive has 53 participants at this point. We had 77 participants in the September drive. In July, 95 people signed up for the drive, and in May we had 36. If you are not participating, it is not too late to join!

Progress report — The drive is quite successful so far, as we have already almost reached our target of a 10% reduction in the number of articles in the backlog. We are doing very well at keeping our Requests page clear, as those articles count double for word count for this drive.

Please keep in mind the possibility of removing other tags when you are finished with an article. If the article no longer needs {{cleanup}}, {{wikify}}, or other similar maintenance tags, please remove them, as this will make the tasks of other WikiProjects easier to complete. Thanks very much for participating in the Drive, and see you at the finish line!

Your drive coordinators –The Utahraptor ^{Talk to me}/_{Contributions}, S Masters (talk), and Diannaa ^(Talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 16:44, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

email

sent you one Netalarm^talk 16:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Late, Sorry Thanks for reviewing me :-). Tofutwitch11-Chat -How'd I do? 21:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Question

Firstly, please let me say thank you for taking the time to review me and for your kind words. I will definitely take your advice on board! I just had a question; if you knew that the Ivan Samylovsky had been created by an OTRS emailer rather than myself, would that have swayed your review?

Thank you again and I apologise if this is impertinent of me. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

No need to apologize, I'm here to help! I did forget to mention your contributions at OTRS which is a big help. I think someone else e-mailing it would have swayed my opinion just a bit, but I think the review is applicable. I often tell people to find one article, make it their own, and take it as far as you can go with it, and doing that would make you a pretty sure bet at Rfa. I've seen you at Rfa pretty frequently so I know you know about the common "Oppose due to lack of content creation". You are an asset to the project, and I'd like to see you have a successful Rfa someday. :) VictorianMutant^(Talk) 19:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, means a lot. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:16, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

BS

		The Original Barnstar
		Too often great editors like you are overlooked and not given the credit deserved for all their great contributions. So I am awarding you this barnstar to let you know I greatly appreciate all you do for Wikipedia, and please keep up the outstanding work!! CTJF83 chat 03:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanx. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 16:38, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Sure, let me know how Bartow GAC review goes (it is on my watchlist) and let me know if you need help with it, or anything. CTJF83 chat 00:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Don't know how long that will be... seems to be pretty big backlog at GA. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 18:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Ya, there is, if I didn't do the peer review, I could have reviewed it...oh well, I can review your next GA. CTJF83 chat 20:43, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

10,000

Hi Victorian mutant, I noticed your 10,000 edit comment at Panyd's editor review. It used to be that 10,000 was the maximum at RFA, if you hadn't passed before you had 10,000 edits then the supposition was that you wouldn't. Those days are gone, and there doesn't seem to be a maximum, the de facto minima nowadays is probably between 3000 and 4000 on EN wiki, though I gather it is 10,000 on DE wiki. If 10,000 is your personal criteria you are of course free to be more picky than almost everyone else, but please be careful not to give people the wrong impression at RFA as people have waltzed through this year with far less than 10,000, this one was unanimous at 8,200. Ϣere SpielChequers 15:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your concern... if you look at what I look for in Rfa candidates here, you will see I don't really list a minimum number, because I look for someone who has shown trustworthiness and that can happen in 3,000 edits or less. I do have a personal standard for myself (I wouldn't think of accepting an Rfa with less than 10,000 edits). I haven't opposed anyone for not having a certain amount of total edits, although I have opposed for not having enough content-related edits. Sure, there have been recent Rfa's in which the editor had less than 10,000 edits (here and here for example), but those tend to be the exception rather than the rule. Go through the history of recent Rfa's and you will see plenty of editors who weren't ready for an Rfa (some with far greater than 10,000 edits).

You talk about 'being "careful" not to give people the wrong impression at RFA', but I've never brought up edit count at Rfa. I do occasionally bring it up at editor review which I see as almost a "heart to heart" chat from one editor to another. More often than not, I will tell editors to wait before seeking an Rfa... sometimes (such as here) I'll express that in terms of time, other times- I tell them that in terms of number of edits. And I think the cautious, prudent advice when giving an editor review is telling editors to be patient and concentrate on their weaknesses before seeking another Rfa. At editor review, I see a lot of good editors who get "antsy" about being nominated at Rfa. Many editors overestimate their chances at Rfa, and to not tell an editor who says they seek an Rfa soon that their chances at Rfa might not be that great is a tragedy (see here and here). I hate seeing productive editors going through a nasty, failed Rfa because they aren't ready and I think it's better to err on the side of caution by telling them to wait (for Rfa) at an editor review than to encourage them to "do it now!" I think I try to keep the reviews positive... I've even been accused of being too nice at editor review. But I don't focus on edit counts at editor review... it's mostly mentioned in passing. If you were to accuse me of telling them to focus on building content... well, that I'm definitely guilty of. :) VictorianMutant^(Talk) 20:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi it was your comment "Try to get up to 10,000 edits because that seems to be where the "minimum" for Rfa seems to be now" that prompted my comment. Ϣere SpielChequers 18:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps it was a bad choice of words, but I do err on the side of caution when giving Rfa advice at editor review. The advice I give at editor review and the way I vote at Rfa are two different things. Are there those out there who would oppose someone simply because they have less than 10,000 edits? Probably... but I'm not one of them. I actually think most of your Rfa criteria is spot on and think Rfa's have become way too incivil at times (especially the ones on the "bubble") which is why I tend to tell candidates to wait. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 20:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Drive – Final push

Greetings GOCE Backlog elimination drive participant, We are now coming up to the last few days of the drive, the last for 2010. Currently, it looks like we will achieve our target for reducing the backlog by 10%, however, we still have huge numbers for 2009. We have 55 participants in this drive. If everyone just clears 2 articles each, we will reduce the backlog by a further 110 articles. If everyone can just do 3 articles, we will hit 165. If you have yet to work on any articles and have rollover words, remember that you do need to copyedit at least a couple of articles in this drive for your previous rollover to be valid for the next drive. There are many very small articles that will take less than 5-10 minutes to copyedit. Use CatScan to find them. Let's all concentrate our firepower on the first three months of 2009 as we approach the end of this final drive for the year. Thank you once again for participating, and see you at the finish line! – SMasters (talk) 04:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

New version of STiki software available

Hello there. I've noticed you are a frequent user of my software tool, STiki. First, I wanted to thank you for your use of my tool. Second, I wanted to inform you that a new version just became available (see this post on STiki's talk page for a brief summary of changes). I encourage you to download it! Further, keep your bug reports and feature requests flowing in. STiki has now reverted over 25,000 instances of vandalism, and I hope together we can help this number continue to grow. Thanks, West.andrew.g (talk) 05:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your thorough editor review which helped me to prepare for my RfA and thank you for your support during that process. If you ever need help from a janitor, please feel free to drop me a line and I hope our paths will cross again! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 02:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive!

We have reached the end of our fourth backlog elimination drive. Thanks to all who participated.

Stats

58 people signed up for this drive. Of these, 48 people participated in the drive.
Although we did not eliminate the months we planned to (January, February, and March 2009; and August, September, and October 2010), we did reduce the backlog by 627 articles (11.2%), which was over our goal of 10%.
49 awards will go out to 33 of 48 participants. Check out the complete list of barnstar winners here.

Barnstars

If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the September 2010 backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering these barnstars within the next couple of weeks.

Our next drive is scheduled for January 2011. In the meantime, please consider helping out at the Wikification drive or any of the other places where help with backlogs is needed.

Thank you for participating in the last 2010 backlog elimination drive! We look forward to seeing you in January!

Your drive coordinators –The Utahraptor ^{Talk to me}/_{Contributions}, S Masters (talk), and Diannaa ^(Talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 00:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Barnstar

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded for your efforts during the November Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you for participating! Diannaa ^(Talk) 00:05, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Year-end Report

Season's Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2010. Read all about these in the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report.

Highlights

Membership grows to 503 editors
2,589 articles removed through four Backlog elimination drives
Our encounter with Jimbo Wales
Guild home pages reorganized and redesigned
Report on our inaugural elections
Guild Plans for 2011
New barnstars introduced
Requests page improved
Sign up for the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive!

Get your copy of the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. See you in 2011!
– Your Coordinators: S Masters (lead), Diannaa, The Utahraptor, and Tea with toast.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bartow, Florida

The article Bartow, Florida you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Bartow, Florida for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive news

Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 backlog elimination drive

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! The drive is halfway over, so here are some mid-drive stats.

Participation

So far, 43 people have signed up for this drive. Of these, 25 have participated. If you signed up for the drive but haven't participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you haven't signed up for the drive yet, you can sign up now.

Progress report

We have eliminated two months from the backlog – January and February 2009. One of our goals is to eliminate as many months as possible from the 2009 backlog. Please help us reduce the size of this part of the backlog if you haven't already. Another goal is to reduce the entire backlog by 10%, or by 515 articles. Currently, we have eliminated 375 articles from the queue, so if each participant copy edits four more articles, we will reach that goal.

Thank you for participating in the January 2011 drive. We anticipate it will be another big success!

Your drive coordinators –S Masters (talk), Diannaa ^(Talk), The Utahraptor ^{Talk to me}, and Tea with toast (Talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 21:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

Bartow GA

What happened? CTJF83 22:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion

Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 Backlog elimination drive

Greetings from the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! We have reached the end of the month and the end of another successful drive; thanks to all who participated.

Statistics

54 people signed up for the year's first Backlog elimination drive. Of these, 40 participated.
One of our goals was to reduce the size of the backlog by at least 10%. We managed to reduce the backlog by 633 articles, or about 12%.
Another goal was to eliminate as many 2009 months as possible from the queue. We eliminated January, February, March, and April—4 out of 12 months is not bad! In addition, we eliminated 37% of all remaining 2009 articles from the queue.
Chaosdruid copy edited Kutch Gurjar Kashtriya for 32,711 words, which is the largest single article completed in one of our drives so far. This article counts as six 5000-K articles, and Chaosdruid wins the "most 5000-K articles" leaderboard category. Way to go! A complete list of individual results is here.

Barnstars

If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the November 2010 Backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering the barnstars within the next couple of weeks.

Thank you for participating in this year's first Backlog elimination drive! We hope to see you in March.

Your drive coordinators –S Masters (talk), Diannaa (talk), The Utahraptor (talk), and Tea with toast (talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:58, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

March 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hi. On behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors, I am inviting you to sign up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive. Win a barnstar! It's fun. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 01:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive

The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive.

Awards and barnstars
A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GOCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page.

We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest

You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

Elections are currently underway for our Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days and ends on June 30, 23:59 UTC. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! There is also a referendum to appoint a Coordinator Emeritus. Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

The latest GOCE backlog elimination drive is under way! It began on 1 July and so far 18 people have signed up to help us reduce the number of articles in need of copyediting.

This drive will give a 50% bonus for articles edited from the GOCE requests page. Although we have cleared the backlog of 2009 articles there are still 3,935 articles needing copyediting and any help, no matter how small, would be appreciated.

We are appealing to all GOCE members, and any other editors who wish to participate, to come and help us reduce the number of articles needing copyediting, as well as the backlog of requests. If you have not signed up yet, why not take a look at the current signatories and help us by adding your name and copyediting a few articles. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words".

>>> Sign-up now <<<

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors

The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their September 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy editing backlog. The drive will begin on September 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on September 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles in the backlog, as we want to copy edit as many of those as possible. Please consider copy editing an article that was tagged in 2010. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". See you at the drive! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters.

>>> Sign up now <<<

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 17:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete Gopal Kundu Controversy page from Scientific plagiarism in India

Hello,

The page "Gopal Kundu Controvesy" of article "Scientific plagiarism in India" contains invalid information about him and the controversy, He is a former scientist who has registered patents and works at National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India. The page also refers to unofficial invalid sources. I request you to check official website of NCCS,Pune,India which is a Indian government body. the URL is www.nccs.res.in/gck.html. Please consider this request because it affects his reputation.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrikantbhalerao101 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Shrikantbhalerao101] has posted this to 13 different users' talk pages. In order to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort, before considering replying, you may like to see my responses here and here. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Book reports

If you want to update them manually, make sure to not remove the comments marking the beginning and end of the report ([1]). This tells the bot where to put the reports. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 05:41, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks I knew I screwed something up- wasn't sure exactly what it was.VictorianMutant^(Talk) 10:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Fedhaven, Florida; Jheol; Fairview, Westchester County, New York; Franklin Springs, Georgia; Brewster, Florida; Florida State Road 17; Sanghar Taluka; Wingnut (hardware); Governor's Square; Takht (Sikhism); RUNX1T1; Jam Nawaz Ali; Republican City Township, Harlan County, Nebraska; Escambia Bay Bridge; Texas's 9th congressional district; Tiegs for Two; Area code 863; Jathedar; Nalcrest, Florida

Cleanup: Satellite Beach, Florida; Takht; Pinellas Park, Florida
Merge: Acquirer; Alakshmi; Like a G6
Add Sources: Osama bin Laden; Florida State Road 570; Interstate 4
Wikify: Expanded octet; Synthetic aperture radar; Tasmanian Conservatorium of Music
Expand: Palm Shores, Florida; History of Pensacola, Florida; Gear

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors

The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters.

>>> Sign up now <<<

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 02:52, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

RE:November 2011

I've been on Wikipedia for almost 2 years now (next month on the 20th) and I'm a trusted member of the community known not to make nonconstructive edits. If you were reverting my edits using a software that automatically gave me a message, then that's all right, but warning me otherwise was not necessary. I was reverting apparent nonconstructive editing myself when I made that contribution, and I can safely say that every edit I make is sworn on the Holy Bible to be constructive. Please explain why you warned me if it was manual. Belugaboy^{cup of tea?} 23:11, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I now see what I did wrong. Stiki uses the side-by-side edit differences, and since my vision is poor and my eyes sometimes cross, I mixed up the previous edit with the current one with the software. I apologize, Belugaboy^{cup of tea?} 23:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

No worries... no one's perfect. I've reverted to bad versions before as well. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 23:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm waaaaay to young to drink beer. I've heard bad things about the taste of beer, but I'm not one to complain. Thanks for understanding, Belugaboy^{cup of tea?} 23:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Okay... have a root beer instead. VictorianMutant^(Talk) 23:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Good idea :) Belugaboy^{cup of tea?} 23:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification of RfD

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion#Wikipedia:Run_to_Mommy you might be interested in. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Miami Maniac

On 26 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Miami Maniac, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the "wedding" of the Miami Maniac, the mascot of the Miami Hurricanes baseball team, was televised nationally on ESPN in a ceremony attended by Bud Man, Grimace and McGruff the Crime Dog? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Miami Maniac.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 19:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC) 19:24, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

RFA thankspam

Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:36, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report

We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.

Highlights

Membership grows to 764 editors, an increase of 261
Report on coordinators' elections
Around 1,000 articles removed through six Backlog elimination drives
Guild Plans for 2012
Requests page report
Sign up for the January 2012 Backlog elimination drive!

Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012!
– Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus).

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

GOCE March copy edit drive

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors

The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

>>> Sign up now <<<

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

GOCE March drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! This is the most successful drive we have had for quite a while. Here is your end-of-drive wrap-up newsletter.

Participation

Of the 70 people who signed up for this drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Special acknowledgement goes out to Lfstevens, who did over 200 articles, most of them in the last third of the drive, and topped all three leaderboard categories. You're a superstar! Stfg and others have been pre-checking the articles for quality and conformance to Wikipedia guidelines; some have been nominated for deletion or had some preliminary clean-up done to help make the copy-edit process more fun and appealing. Thanks to all who helped get those nasty last few articles out of the target months.

Progress report

During this drive we were successful in eliminating our target months—October, November, and December 2010—from the queue, and have now eliminated all the 2010 articles from our list. We were able to complete 500 articles this month! End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here.

When working on the backlog, please keep in mind that there are options other than copy-editing available; some articles may be candidates for deletion, or may not be suitable for copy-editing at this time for other reasons. The {{GOCEreviewed}} tag can be placed on any article you find to be totally uneditable, and you can nominate for deletion any that you discover to be copyright violations or completely unintelligible. If you need help deciding what to do, please contact any of the coordinators.

Thank you for participating in the March 2012 drive! All contributions are appreciated. Our next copy-edit drive will be in May.

Your drive coordinators – Dianna ^(Talk), Stfg (Talk), and Dank (talk)

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

EdwardsBot (talk) 22:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)