User talk:Vianello/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
This page archives posts from December 25th of 2008 to April 14th of 2009.
please close my account
i do not wish to be on wikipedia any more after this last series of attacks upon me by lawton thank you VIANELLO? --kathy-treks-on (talk) 07:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Barbarian Overlords
Can you tell me why The Barbarian Overlords were not noteworthy to remain on wikipedia?
Thanks
Thanks a bunch for your 'attack page' warning. I have no clue who was trying to do what.. So I mentioned it to Ice Cold Beer. Although I have not received a reply from this fine admin, he appears to be taking care of things.. How did you notice that page? (Frankly, I'm surprised that anyone went through that much trouble, or even bothered reading my userpage.) I assume some vandal got mad. Considering as reverting, warning and typos are about all the editing I do... It's darned near a certainty. 'Sigh.' There are times I wish the vandals would just stop... And then I realize how bored I would get..
In any case, thanks again for your help to me, and, of course, your help to this community as a whole.
𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 01:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Porn for the blind
Hello. I saw you previously agreed that "Porn For the Blind" should be deleted, and recently I nominated it as well. However, a bunch of people do not understand (like you did) that it is a hoax. I saw you also agreed it should be deleted in the past. Can you reiterate your position here? Are you allowed to? Thanks. Angelatomato (talk) 09:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Porn_for_the_Blind_(2nd_nomination)
Added Robert M Heller to articles for deletion log
Hey, I hope you don't mind. I took the liberty of adding Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_M_Heller to the articles for deletion log page. Liberal Classic (talk) 04:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- I checked your contribs and didn't see that you had edited the log. Sometimes I forget a step. I guess I need to learn to use Twinkle to automate more stuff. :) Liberal Classic (talk) 00:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
vianello, as i had mentioned i am not the sole author of that page, so i dont see it as a conflict of interest. it's a budding page, i say give it time to grow. also can you give me more information about this twinkle program.Martinschmit (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
i cant seem to edit my article talk page. and lets give it some time. ay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinschmit (talk • contribs) 02:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
OK. well i found out how to edit the talk page. it's my first page and i think it would be nice to get this page up. this person was in a movie. people like mark schiff have pages and i've never even heard of the guy. he even has a notability issue on his. just give it time. it will not be a problem. Martinschmit (talk) 02:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
you will probably delete it. this person is a budding comedian, if you don't see THAT as notable, you shouldn't be flagging pages left and right. Martinschmit (talk) 02:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
its not really up to you i would say as you don't have those administrative capabilities. once the page has been finished, probably by tommorow night. also two of the flags are not appropriate. just one question though, if someone made a page on a topic you were unaware of, and they weren't quite finished with it, would you flag that too? CONCLUDED, SIR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinschmit (talk • contribs) 03:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
i've dropped you several lines, as you've just responded to one of them. in none of your responses have you given me an adequate answer. there are many comedian pages on wikipedia, this is just one more. this isn't a page about a friend's birthday or something of that sort. this is a page, about a chicago comedian, who you happen to know nothing of yet. the page will be complete master vianello, just you wait. Martinschmit (talk) 03:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
how should i cite this person to you? should i explain their background? do they have to be on another website, before they are on this one? i'm being serious here. and i believe i know what reliable sources are, i'd just like you to specify. just to be fair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinschmit (talk • contribs) 03:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Question
Could you explaine me what is criteria for writers and philosophers (verification, number of books or papers)?--Vojvodaeist 20:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- I need some time to finish article. Could you give me one day before deletion?--Vojvodaeist 20:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll do it. Please don't be angry. I don't know criterias but I'll read it as son as I can. Thanks for help.--Vojvodaeist 20:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Starting a new project
Can you explain me how can I start new project on Wikipedia?--Vojvodaeist 16:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Stephen Cosgrove (writer)
Thanks for correcting this - I've got no idea what either manga or anime are, and managed to misremember which one it was from the article! PamD (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
CSD Tagging
Hello. You just tagged James Michael Mitchell as WP:G1, or patent nonsense. While the page should be deleted under a CSD criteria, patent nonsense only applies to pages that are incomprehensible. I have therefore replaced the speedy on that page with a more appropriate one. Just wanted to let you know; G1s are very specific and James Michael Mitchell does not qualify. Thanks. DARTH PANDAduel • work 01:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yasus Afaris
What the hell have you done with this article? It's a preliminary article about a significant dub poet. By what right do you decide that his bio is not important. I'd like to have him restored until some knowledgeable people can discuss his appropriateness on Wikipedia. Pmbcomm (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I was slandered beyond words by rklawton for the last 5 years
now that he is an administrator he has been without mercy towards me because i porved him wrong on the Lincoln death photograph, nothing against you or anybody else here, but he has been horrible to me of late, guess i snapped., sorry, i just wont edit anymore for awhile, okay?
Again I am sorry I just snapped when I saw what rk has done to my photographs at wikicommons and here , i had been doing so well and for so long and then this guy becomes an administrator and raises hells fire against me and OTHERS who he used to have disagreements with....i feel powerless to do anything about it or him...it is too bad, i am going to miss wikipedia alot.
I am broken hearted by this monster who calls himself a man, mr rklawton.
- -(
--kathy-treks-on (talk) 06:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I placed one symbol on my user page for future use. If I can't put it there then where should it go? Moby-Dick3000 (talk) 20:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- I never intended to create an entire article for it. That was a mistake. Thank you for pointing out my error. Moby-Dick3000 (talk) 21:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Hoax article
I see what you mean. Thanks for pointing that out. It appears that the creator is suggesting it's a 2009 film - but then, how would they know the plot if no one's seen it yet? So I think it could be speedied, which I'll do (if no one else has done it yet). Deb (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Nice to know not everyone hates me! :-)
Hello
Hello fellow colleague, I see you are interested in parasites, and I thought I might ask you about a revision on an article, harvest mites. Here's the situation, I wish to revise the article a bit(here is the preview - User:bugboy52.40/sandbox2) and it was also proposed to me that only species of the genus Leptotrombidium, not Tromicula, are vectors of the disease scrub typhus by Gak. I just wanted to verify this before I create an article for Leptotrombidium and change the Harvest mite article(which says that they are vectors of this disease)
Automatic patrolling of tagged pages at New Page patrol
Hi there. There is a suggestion to get a bot to patrol any New Page that an editor has tagged for CSD, AfD, etc. As someone who patrols a lot, your opinion is particularly welcomed. --GedUK 10:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello agian
I am trying to improve the article I created, Trombiculidae, so it can become a GA artile. But I need so more info on the lifecycle of the trombiculid mites, specificaly the nymph and the adult, like what happens when the mite is done gorging on its host. You are free to help improve, expand, fix typos, and stuff like that in my sandbox, User:Bugboy52.40/sandbox, I plan on moving most or all the info on chiggers under the subheading, larva. Then when I, or we, think it is done, I will ask Stemonitis to look it over agian and see if it is ready for GA status, then I will copy/paste it over trobiculidae. Thanks in advance! Buɡboy52.4 (talk) 14:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your warm welcome and advice on the userboxes.
Cheers! See you around.
Calamitas-92 (talk) 04:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of B-switch
An article that you have been involved in editing, B-switch, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B-switch. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 18:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Why
Why are you editing my submission with your own (incorrect) redirects? I have submitted an entry for Christian Stewardship and each time shortly after I save it, you redirected the submission to "Christianity and environmentalism" which is incorrect and off the topic we were trying to submit. Why are you doing this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brossyg (talk • contribs) 18:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Help me with Lair of the Golden Bear page
Help me with Lair of the Golden Bear page
Make it up to wikipedias standards cuz i don't know how to do it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.229.131.144 (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Please
I hope I am not being a pain, or if you're busy, but I really need to know if you can get any info on what happens after the larva trombiculid mite is done feding, especially on the nymph, like what it does, how it develops to an adult. Buɡboy52.4 (talk) 01:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you, thank you! I have been trying get this page to GA status forever, but I was waiting on you. Buɡboy52.4 (talk) 02:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for the vandalism revert on my user page. Pfainuk talk 13:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry for removing your A1 from Tracy Strauss with such an appalling edit summary (that's the last time I try to do 4 things at the same time!). It would have been better to say that the article does not satisfy the very short sub-criterion of A1, and is therefore inappropriate. The no-context tag is a good compromise, as the article does lack lack much context, I suppose, having been so brutally hacked from another page without including a little of that page's context. Please accept my apologies. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 21:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, just my overpowering hate of being wrong coming through. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 21:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Beauty Through Broken Glass
An article that you have been involved in editing, Beauty Through Broken Glass, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beauty Through Broken Glass. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. QuestionOfAnarchy (talk) 11:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Rustpack
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rustpack, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rustpack. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CyberGhostface (talk) 18:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Laserface
Well, we invented a new genre, preform at youth shows, and have an album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obatrops (talk • contribs) 05:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Hmm... Well, http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Cheshire_TV how come this is notable!?!?!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obatrops (talk • contribs) 06:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Howdy
Re your message: You're welcome. =) I don't recall exactly what it was because Gra...p was spewing his usual stuff all over the map. He was trying to expose somebody's location and IP, but I don't recall if it was you or one of the other editors that night as he was trying to publish a lot of information. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)