User talk:Vetadria

Welcome

Hello, Vetadria, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Timote gabashvili have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cind.amuse (Cindy) 07:10, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 01:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Lobzhanidze (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only cited 11 times

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Lobzhanidze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:George Lobzhanidze, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vetadria! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:George Lobzhanidze

Hello, Vetadria. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:George Lobzhanidze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly removing content about Armenians

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RaffiKojian (talk) 04:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia, is not a place for Armenian propaganda. Ungrounded, fake and misleading content will be removed, that how it's should be. Vetadria (talk) 16:28, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to make a better case than just yelling "fake sources" or "propaganda". 199.80.8.254 (talk) 18:14, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

propaganda edits will be reverted. this is how wikipedia works, and no exceptions will be made. no content with fake sources or nationalistic claims will be tolerated, neither here, nor elsewhere Vetadria (talk) 17:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no, it is you who is yelling. have you read this "source" Karapetyan, Samvel (2004). The Armenians in Kakhet (PDF)? I believe you have not. nobody in the world takes it seriously except some nationalistic Armenians. this source should be removed from here and elsewhere, as misleading, unreliable and nationalistic, that fuels the conflict between neighbors. . why don't research a little bit more on the topic you are editing? is it so difficult to read a little bit more? is this how you take a side without realizing the problem? well done Vetadria (talk) 20:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 13:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

in this section, the only "source" is Karapetyan, Samvel (2004). The Armenians in Kakhet (PDF). Yerevan: Gitutyun. pp. 224+24. ISBN 580800585X.. this author is well known for Armenian nationalistic and extremist ideas and confronts with all current Armenian neighbors. thus, it should not be used as a reliably source, neither here nor elsewhere. are you supporting extremism and ultra nationalism? check this author, nobody in scientific world takes him seriously Vetadria (talk) 20:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]