User talk:Versus22/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Versus22. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Anti-Intellectualism Article

Hello. I've been trying to edit the anti-intellectualism article to remove bias and non-cited material which currently there is ALOT of. The section on religion is inconclusive as religion, contrary to many portrayals and depictions, is not the source. The best way I can combat this is by being bold as Wikipedia encourages and deleting the biased sections. Can you reverse your decision to revert my removal of content or give me an alternative to removing the bias? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.3.164 (talk) 08:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Hi! Sorry, I was reverting some vandalism that some guy did to a page, and I got a bit angry. 60.230.161.111 (talk) 09:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, please don't do it again. Versus22_talk 09:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Christopher Wheat

hi i made a page and it got edited to be hilarious. Its also sort of anoying. when your done just delete it. Have fun!Cwheat11 (talk) 04:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

paris hilton

what i wrote about paris is true why delete it----- big-diddler —Preceding unsigned comment added by Big-Diddler (talk • contribs) 07:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. You deleted basically the whole page of content (good comments). Also, the content that you replaced was inappropriate to say. Versus22_talk 07:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

it wasn't a test edit

You should actually examine what I edited and then see that it was carefully considered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayandneedles (talk • contribs) 02:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

You removed headings from the article. It wasn't very constructive (It wasn't an ad or anything). Versus22_talk 02:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi

I am just cleaning your talk page for hygiene purposes. It is full of flith. Good day to you sir. --Fender Looter (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't need my talk page cleaned. I will clean it myself, or I will assign a bot to do so. The same also goes if you do it to other users as well. Regards, --Versus22_talk 22:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

RE

Thank you for the Happy Birthday template! Even though it may have only took a few seconds, it means a lot. Just when I think no one remembers, Wikipedia--the best place ever does, and I'd like to thank you for making my day, as well as everyone else at the birthday committee. Thank you for helping to make this site an enjoyable one. -- penubag (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem, Penubag!

Versus22_talk 05:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

About this computer. . .

This computer IP is actually a public computer at a school, so sometimes, this computer and others like it may have a few idiots come on and vandilise the site. I'm going to try and keep track ok? 168.254.225.171 (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I should be able to handle these vandilism type issues, and I was the one who posted the above message. Learner4 (talk) 17:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Versus22_talk 17:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

For your efforts

		The Edit Conflict Barnstar
		For a stupendously annoying 9 edit conflicts in a row on Huggle, I hereby award you the Edit Conflict barnstar, Keep up the good work! :D - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 22:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Jamesontai. I was thinking to use Huggle again! :-) Versus22_talk 23:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello Versus22

Thanks for the warning that you recently posted on my page...i appreciate the assistance

I am posting a talk back on your page just in case you wanted to reply

YoMaSoFat (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Edit: Please Note You DONT have new messages on my page YoMaSoFat (talk) 23:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

About your Huggle Revision

Hey man, just wanted to let you know that when you reverted vandalism on the article Arabic language, you accidentally restored another piece of vandalism. No worries though, I fixed it. Just wanted to let you know Knippschild (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

I didn't see that edit for the other user. Thanks for clearing the rest of it up. Versus22_talk 06:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Uh... a random warning or a mistake?

Yeah, I pop up just came up when saying I edited Nashville, Tenesee. And I have't edited anything since last year? Was this a glitch in the system or accidental? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.166.34.33 (talk) 00:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi. You made an edit to Nashville, Tennessee last year. The warning was back in December of last year, I don't see a glitch. Sincerely, --Versus22_talk 00:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar!

Thank you Filper01! :) Versus22_talk 17:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Im trying to make wikipedia more accurate

I AM going to change the parapsychology heading, I have a BSc, MSc and am currently doing a PhD in psychology, with an interest in parapsychology, and as an area of science, the misuse of its name is sooo damaging... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caernunos666 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

OK. Go ahead, that's fine with me! :-) Versus22_talk 18:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Forgive me dear Versus :) I'm not a troll^^^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jalo ciuccia il cazzo (talk • contribs) 18:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

...for reverting the vandalism on my user page. BarretBonden (talk) 19:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Versus22_talk 21:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :)

[1] —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 00:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! :-) Versus22_talk 00:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

erroneous block

I apologize for briefly blocking you. It was an off-by-one click trying to stop the blanking of California Trail‎ yet again. Thanks for your understanding. —EncMstr (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I thought I undid the block within 40 seconds, but it turns out your IP was autoblocked due to the type of block. It took awhile to figure out how to undo that. Sorry for the trouble. —EncMstr (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

It's okay. Thanks for unblocking me. I thought I was doing the right thing. Versus22_talk 00:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

antivandalism barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts identifying and fighting vandalism. Your excellent work has been unrecognized for far too long. May vandals quake when they see your messages! —EncMstr (talk) 01:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you EncMstr.

Versus22_talk 01:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Romanesqu architecture

I'm just alerting you to an ongoing problem. I notice that you recently reverted 2 vandalistic edits. The edit to which you reverted was also by an unnamed editore and was not exactly vandalism but was inane, ungrammatic, out-of-place and also needed reverting. The problem that occurs when experienced editors revert only part of the damage is that the problem that they have left behind can then go unnoticed. A whole section of Fra Angelico's life went missing for three months before I entirely reread the article, tracked the problem and sorted it out. Please be diligent in checking all the unnamed edits when you revert. Amandajm (talk) 09:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

~~:Can you please show me which article I did that? I can't find my revert in the Fra Angelico article. Versus22_talk 18:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)~~

I thought that revision was okay. I couldn't find that little error after I reverted the vandal edit. The article has so much text that it was hard for me to find, but I'm glad you found the error. Normally when I revert, I often check if there are any other vandal edits as well (sometimes I miss), but I'm doing my best to removed unwanted text that was in the article. Again, sorry about that and thanks! Versus22_talk 18:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Versus. I'm am having such trouble saving anything to wiki, that I am getting really pissed off, and am on the brink of cancelling my Optus account! Amandajm (talk) 11:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you use PC or mobile? At least this edit you made saved! :-) Versus22_talk 11:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:Happy Birthday!

Thank you! I'm glad how the Birthday Commitee manages to celebrate everyone's birthday! C Teng ^[talk] 12:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Movement for Democratic Change

No problem. From looking at his edit history Mazhindu13 seems like a genuine but inexperienced user who was trying to remove obvious vandalism - he had recently made a good faith edit to the same article. --Kwekubo (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I removed the warning and set a note about the "Blanked the page" summary on his talk page. Versus22_talk 00:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Re this

I assume you were talking about this edit? I'm just trying to fix a small bug :) --Chris 07:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, the bot is not working properly? Versus22_talk 07:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

It looks more like connection issues atm, rather than the bots code. Anyway just thought i'd let you know why I 'haggered' my userpage :) (also just an fyi, if the bot had been up and running properly, it would have blocked you, though you would have been unblocked pretty quickly) --Chris 07:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Oops sorry, I just wanted to help. :( Versus22_talk 07:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry, and thanks for helping. I just thought id warn you so you don't end up with another accidental block in your block log. --Chris 08:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm actually very surprised that AntiAbuseBot didn't go on this user's talk page. :P Versus22_talk 08:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the quick revert of my page! THat was fast! Terrancee (talk) 08:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Have a Happy Valentine's Day! :) Versus22_talk 08:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Same, thanks. • \ / (⁂) 09:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Iraq war

What your postion on the iraq war? do you support it or are against it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.186.67.7 (talk) 11:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I wished the war stopped. However in Wikipedia related things, why do you continue to blank huge chunks of the Iraq War article and putting nonsense in? That is not really productive. Versus22_talk 11:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Business process management

You are clearly missing the point !! If you would like to join some of the standards committees that actually develop this type of information, feel free to contact either me, ANSI, AIIM, or ISO.

I have been attempting to correct this page with industry standard information such as from ISO 229957, ISO 15801, AIIM ARP 1 and numerous other ACKNOWLEDGED AND APPROVED STANDARD SETTING BODIES such as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Association for Information and Image Management (AIIM), and the International Standard Organization (ISO). As the Committee Chair for several of these standardization committees and a member of several ISO technical committees, I have been providing you with the corrected text. Please either leave the industry standardized information and not that from organizations or individuals who are only sharing their personal beliefs out of the wikipedia as all that does is limit the value this website has. I will continue to correct this type of erroneous information and insert the text that has been vetted through the official standards development process. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.129.56.224 (talk) 12:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I personally don't see your edits constructive. What you put in recently is sort of written like an ad, plus the page looks really messy on a Wikipedia article. You removed a whole lot of content which in my views it's vandalism and I had to revert it. Also, you blanked the whole page on one edit that I had to revert as well. Versus22_talk 12:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

So, then your approach rather than following industry standards, is to delete the industry accepted descriptions? Feel free to contact me directly, as I am the committee chair-person for several of these ANSI/AIIM and ISO standard setting efforts ! I have made the corrections again, and hope you won't simply delete this message to you in an effort to revert the pages back again without people having an opportuntity to see who is providing the corrections —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert-blatt (talk • contribs) 12:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

BPM Corrections

I have been trying to correct the BPM page, and someone keeps deleting my corrections. I am the Committee Chair person for the following standard setting committees (along with heavily involved in ISO TC/171 and liason to TC/46/SC11)

ANIS/AIIM C21 Advanced Data Storage ANSI/AIIM C27 Document Management AIIM Implementation Guidelines

The corrections for the BPM page are shown in the history for the edits I have been attempting to provide. This information is publically available ARP 1 (www.aiim.org/standards)

Please let me know whether you folks want actual industry standard terminology or only personal opinions, before I spend any more time helping with the wikipedia effort

Thank you and I hope to hear back from you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert-blatt (talk • contribs) 12:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Gotta be careful when reverting

See this edit. While the IP did remove some legitimate material, it also was removing a classic example of vandalism/defamation. Your work is appreciated. You just have to make sure you see what you're restoring, because sometimes the IP's removal of information is semi-justified. Obviously it would've been better had the IP used an edit summary, but oh well... Enigma^msg 05:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

The reason why I revert that was that he didn't give an edit summary why he removed that section. Versus22_talk 05:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes. What I'm saying is that you can't blanket-revert for not using an edit summary if the IP is removing vandalism. Removing what looks like legitimate content without an edit summary is ok to revert, but not if the edit is removing paragraphs of vandalism. Enigma^msg 05:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

yeah...

I actually work at a mcdonalds so its not my "opinion" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.50.157.10 (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

There shouldn't be any "I" statements in the article. That was what I meant to say in the edit summary. Versus22_talk 23:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

i apologize for all the useless and offensive material i've been posting on wikipedia

yeah...i really recognize your efforts and the efforts of people like you keep wikipedia a helpful and effective information source, and i just wanted to say sorry. thank you for all the great work you've been doing for the wikipedian community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pigmietheclub (talk • contribs) 09:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

That was very nice of you to say that. Thank you, I appreciate it!

I hope you start performing constructive edits and helping Wikipedia, instead of vandalizing articles and putting in offensive material, ok? :) Versus22_talk 09:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Great Work Reverting Vandalism!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I see you reverting a ton of vandalism very quickly and efficiently. Thanks for the great work! FaerieInGrey (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! :-) Versus22_talk 19:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for helping me bust vandals using Huggle. -down load \| sign! 23:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! :-) Versus22_talk 00:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the multiple reverts on my user and talk pages. Little Mountain 5 00:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

Hey man sorry for the edits

Sean Gorrie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.68.95.172 (talk) 00:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I accept your apology. Versus22_talk 00:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry versus

I'm having a bad day.. A couple days ago, I did the same thing. I was bored, and you know teens. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.101.74.107 (talk) 01:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.101.74.107 (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

It's okay. I hope you feel better soon, and start helping Wikipedia! :) Versus22_talk 01:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Today its been vandalized by two different vandals because I reverted edits. Is there anyway to prevent that or is it just an inconvenience to revert vandalism? --Bhockey10 (talk) 03:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

You can go ask an administrator to get your user page protected indefinitely, but based on your user rights, that only prevents IP's from editing your page. Versus22_talk 04:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Cool, thanks again! --Bhockey10 (talk) 04:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

THanks for reverting vandalism on my user and talk page. I've put it back on my talk page because it amuses me nad it'll get archvied soon enough but thanks anyway. --Ged UK (talk) 20:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! Versus22_talk 21:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Request for your assistance

Hey Versus: First of all, great job on the vandal reverts! Second, I was looking at your user page and noticed that it's incredibly neat. I was wondering if you could possibly take a look at mine... I'm redoing it though because alot of it was outdated stuff and whatnot. Anyway, how might I go about setting an alignment for the userboxes? --Amaraiel (talk) 20:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm actually in the middle of doing my user page. To start though sort everything into subpages. An example of neatness is from RexNL's userpage. (which inspired me to do one simaliar to his). It will look a bit different in the end when I'm finished, though. Versus22_talk 21:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

		- Jameson L. Tai's Guestbook Barnstar
		For signing my guestbook - I, - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs}, hereby present Versus22 with this award. Cheers! -- - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 10:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

What a night on simple

Hiya :) What a night on simple. That guy? has been vandalising ALL night. I've counted at least a dozen socks and probably more than that. They do see to have access t a lot of proxies. fr33k man -s- 05:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, RyanCross blocked that user you and I were fighting. Versus22_talk 05:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

I've been dealing with him all night. I was very close to asking a steward for temp sysop for the night so I could block him. I really doubt whether a single user id made last night was not him! You know, I just don't get people like that, I don't understand it! :-( fr33k man -s-

heyy

U cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.122.173 (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! :) Versus22_talk 06:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Garrison Courtney

Hi. New user here. I wasn't really trying to vandalize that page. I just wanted to nominate it for deletion, but I am not sure what I'm doing. It is clearly a vanity page. I tried to nominate it, but I think I may need an account or something. So if possible could you nominate the page for me. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.36.81 (talk • contribs) 20:31, February 21, 2009 (UTC)

I don't see anything wrong with the page, plus I can't nominate it for you. Sorry. Versus22_talk 06:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Appologies

Just wanted to say sorry for my 'vandalism' I did it to test out how quickly the response of other users would be and I am most impressed by your quick response time. How did you see my vandalism so quickly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.152.203 (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

I use Huggle to revert vandalism. Versus22_talk 20:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, so that is some programme that allows you instantly to see potential vandalism? Am I correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.152.203 (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it allows you to revert vandalism and go though each diff of articles very quickly, than going through recent changes. Versus22_talk 20:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Most interesting! Final question - does this programme show you edits on ALL pages, or just ones that you select it to show you - for example your user page? Many thanks for your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.152.203 (talk) 20:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, there is a list that shows recent activity of articles being edited on the left side of the program, but you can only see one article at a time. The diff on the right is the current revision, and the diff on the left is the previous revision. To use Huggle, you must have Rollback rights, by having some anti-vandalism experience (i.e: vandalism fighter). You also have to create an account and use that account to fight vandalism if you're wanting Rollback permissions. Versus22_talk 20:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your time - most helpful you have been!

No problem! :-) Versus22_talk 20:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Heh, you found me

Should I give you a cookie or something for that? [2] --Blooper (Talk) 02:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

If you want to... :)

I can't access WiiBrew or DSiBrew wiki lately. Versus22_talk 02:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Adding "195.178.184.67 wiibrew.org dsibrew.org" to your hosts file like mha suggested on Hackmii did the trick for me. --Blooper (Talk) 02:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Does it matter where I put it or no? Also, what program did you open it with? Versus22_talk 03:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Just paste it in a new line at the end of the file (actually, it doesn't really matter as long as it's on it own line). I used Notepad++, but any other text editor should also work. You should probably remove the line once the server is working again, as it is just a temporary fix. --Blooper (Talk) 03:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Done. Thank you Blooper!

Versus22_talk 03:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes hello you deleted my comment however it shouldn't have been deleted because it is true, I am frequent Cast Parties and uh...yeah, booze and crack is everywhere. 96.255.239.234 (talk) 04:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Look at the diff again, there is one reason why I reverted that. You were doing editing tests as well in that diff. Versus22_talk 04:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Queenie

Queenie ^Talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Aw, thanks for the compliment. I only changed my name last month - I was TopGearFreak for a while. Queenie's better though :) Queenie ^Talk 17:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Done :D Versus22_talk 08:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Congrats! You've successfully beaten me to vandalism 140 billion times! :P →Dyl @n 620 23:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

-- :-) Versus22_talk 23:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

OK versus22.97.95.46.155 (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem

I am doing a bot run on Commons and I was too lazy to switch back to my normal account (User:J JMesserly) Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J JMesserly (talk • contribs) 21:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your help, reverting the edits in the Spud Webb article. Mcwebeditor (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Wow! I did a ton of reverting vandalism/tests today! :D Versus22_talk 23:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Garrison Courtney

Garrison Courtney, an article that you contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. The nominator does not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns.Esasus (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

That sucks

Hi. Just saw this. Oh that sucks huh? I'd hate that to happen to me. Easily explanable, but always there nonetheless. fr33k man -s- 02:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I know. Versus22_talk 04:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

It's one of those incidents that makes you want to go to the Board of Trustees and demand they make the sysadmins remove it completely from the database. No matter what you do, the Mediawiki software will always show you as being blocked. Sucks, sucks big time! :) fr33k man -s- 04:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

It's nice to know fellow wikipedians have my back covered when vandals try and mess around with my page : ) Badgernet ₪

I know! :-) Versus22_talk 10:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your assistance in editing the brontosaurus article on Wikipedia. I apologize but your information is incorrect and I shall be reverting it. 158.59.247.77 (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Actuslly, as you should have saw by the article title, no your revision is clearly incorrect. (You actually wearn't editing from the Brontosaurus article). Versus22_talk 17:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I understand your concern, but you are incorrect. The dinosasur is the brontosaurus (because I typed brontosaurus in the search bar) and I mean to correct this error. 158.59.247.77 (talk) 17:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Keep an eye on Carmen "Nuch" Trutanich

I notice you also reverted some questionable changes to this article. This may be turning into another Sarah Palin situation, one of the POV pushing editors is claiming the article is being used for political purposes, and it does seem to consist mostly of negative information. I'm trying to clean it upo some, but I think the more people have this watchlisted the better... Beeblebrox (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

First of all, they shouldn't be removing all the references and the section headers. That is not constructive or appropriate for an article. It looks sloppy. Versus22_talk 02:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I've tried to fix it up, but there is a lot of clumsy POV editing going on. It was going back and forth between a blatant attack piece and a total whitewash, I think I've managed to make a little more neutral. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Your RfA

Hey Versus - thanks for your your message regarding my failed RfA. I really appreciate your time and support, and I will definitely be running again! Happy editing to you. FlyingToaster 23:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Happy editing to you too! Versus22_talk 23:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

...And a epic fail to PretentiousDuckling! :P Versus22_talk 23:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I am so calling that a win. FlyingToaster 23:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Notice of request for deletion of editor Versus22 :)

Versus22, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion#Versus22 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). →Dyl @n 620 18:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I thank you for this, Dylan620! :D Versus22_talk 23:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (February 2009)

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 00:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

2 things

check out this reply!
How did you make that header once you click on the edit tab?? MediaWiki software? 12.202.228.168 (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

What's taking you so long to think? Haven't you already thought of an answer? 12.202.228.168 (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

See this page on how to get that. Remember though, please don't say anything mean to other users, It is not nice. Users like J.delanoy work hard at Wikipedia, here to help users, working on articles, working hard to get rid of vandalism put in by other users, and in other areas on Wikipedia. However, nobody likes personal attacks. It is a put-down to the community, and they just don't like it. Please just treat others with respect, and stay calm. There is no need to get mad at people. Thank you. Versus22_talk 22:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I apologize for the late reply, was thinking of something to type. Versus22_talk 22:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

re the reverting of vandalism on my userpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Versus22_talk 21:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you Versus22 for catching the unwelcomed edit to my user page and reverting it. I underestimated the strong feelings some people have for Sloppy Joes. Shinerunner (talk) 12:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Now if only I could have some Sloppy Joes! :) Versus22_talk 13:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

AFD comments about IP "votes"

At several Afds relisted today, you have advocated counting the "votes" of certain IP editors. As described in the DRV discussions, those IPs have been determined to be sockpuppets of the AFD nominator. Counting them would clearly be inappropriate. Could you please revise your comments? The nominator's behavior was not correct, and other discussions indicated some very odd behavior -- at one point, he apparently was nominating one or more Oscar winners for speedy deletion without explanation! Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Note: Commented at the AFD page. Versus22_talk 19:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for your recent revert of vandalism on my userpage, much appreciated Spitfire^Tally-ho! 21:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

And again Spitfire^Tally-ho! 21:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem man! :) Versus22_talk 21:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Watchmen

Please watch who you accuse of vandalizing a page. The infobox is for the theatrical release of a film. If a film is released theatrically with different cuts (like Alien (film) was, then you would make not of the various run times of the film. ALL films are edited for time, and most films nowadays come with an "uncut" or "director's cut" version. That does not change the fact that when originally released there was only 1 run time. The various cuts (which do not even exist yet) are already mentioned later in the article, at their appropriate placement. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Sending my apologies. I just realized that I confused your name with Valoem (talk · contribs). Again, my apologies. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

No worries! I sometimes get confused with people too (and other things). I was actually reverting vandalism edits from 98.165.212.4. Versus22_talk 23:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a ton for the help!

TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for help removing the vandalism on my user page. The vandal (User:Y32) has been identified as a sock puppet and has been indefinitely blocked. I really appreciate it and if I can do anything for you just ask.TomCat4680 (talk) 18:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

cathy

try watching the sketch some time —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.229.21 (talk • contribs)

Thanks!

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my userpage. Keep up the good work. Tim meh ! 02:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Just wanted to thank you for dealing with the vandalism on my user page. --Odie5533 (talk) 04:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

About "Softies"

This song is listed as being the new Weezer single, but the page gives NO SOURCES and no sources confirming this can be found. It has been edited constantly since being put up and I think it should be deleted until a valid source can be given. THAT is why I made the edit to it that I did. Please do something about this, if you're able to. 64.53.37.3 (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit? There are NO SOURCES given here. I simply removed the very, very questionable information. I can't find any sources, neither can anyone at the Weezer messageboard I go to. This is, uh, bunk, and it's worthless to keep the info up unless there is a valid source. 64.53.37.3 (talk) 05:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, can you pass along the IP of the page creator, that way the admins at the weezer message board can see if it belongs to anyone there (which, if it is a joke, it most likely will).

Question about serial-cat-tagger

Hi, I see you're actively patrolling at the moment. Could you have a look at the behavior of Special:Contributions/71.234.156.208? In my opinion this guy is a drive-by-"catter", but of course I could be wrong. Thanks! EdBever (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll go check. There has been tons of vandalism though, which I can't believe. Versus22_talk 19:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

This is greatly appreciated. =) Tony Fox (arf!) 21:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! :) Versus22_talk 05:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't even bother warning when stuff like this happens.

If it's happening to specific page or user page (and they haven't stated they don't want otherwise), report it to page protection; they'll never see the warning you post and you could have done something with the seconds you just wasted. Random IP bombings literally aren't worth warning. Just clean up and cut them off. HalfShadow 21:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

thanks for the barnstar

... it was much appreciated! But, even admins couldn't edit during that time. The whole thing seized up for everyone, apparently. Still, muchas gracias for the barnstar!--Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I think it less affected the admins than it did for people with just rollback or in no user right group. I saw a few admins at the block log when I couldn't edit. Versus22_talk 05:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages

Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! S B H arris 23:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Grr...

Good job! You're beating me to all the edits. ♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 23:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

You, Versus22, have just been awarded The New Mikemoral's generic barnstar in miniature. You can earn this award too for other generic things, just like Versus22 did.

Thanks, The New Mikemoral! :) Versus22_talk 05:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I see that you've been cleaning up after those IPs on my talk page. Thanks :) just try to keep your cool, you're not the only one to know what it's like with those Grawp hooligans! Cheers, ~ Troy (talk) 00:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Wow.

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		When I find vandalism, I either click "rv" or "rollback," and I usually find that I have made an edit to Wikipedia. But recently (in the past 15 minutes), I have clicked those, and found that YOU made the edit. Great work! Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 00:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Basketball110! :) Versus22_talk 05:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Deleting US-Saudi Relationship

Hi I merged my article US-Saudi Relationship to Saudi Arabia-United States relations and want to delete the first one

thank you

--Alz3eeam (talk) 04:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC) --173.22.255.133 (talk) 04:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Note: Commented at the talk page of IP. Versus22_talk 04:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar thanks!

Defender of the Wiki! Wow! I really appreciate that one. Was this about the swath I cut through on March 9 in the morning US EDT? I had no idea there was no non-admin access then ... is this some new feature I didn't know about? Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah it was this morning. I couldn't even edit (I kept on getting those SQL errors). Although, I did see some sysops or more advanced status people going though the block log and dealing with a lot of vandals + deleting nonsense pages. Man, the backlog was getting ridiculous at AIV this morning. :) Versus22_talk 05:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Versus22, thanks also! PhilKnight (talk) 17:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Heh, I thought that barnstar was suitable for you since it had a knight on it! :) Versus22_talk 17:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

User:66.16.66.62

He is casuing alot of damage.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

March 2009

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Bush (band): You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.

Yeah, sorry. There has been so much vandalism (more than normal). So I had to remove all of that in a ton of articles, but completely forgot to warn some people. Again, sorry for the inconvenience. Best, Versus22_talk 18:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, no need to apologize - I just wanted to let you know. Thanks and have a nice day, Darrenm540 (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. ... discospinster _talk 18:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem! :) Versus22_talk 18:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Help

Huggle is giving this message "Huggle is not enabled on your account,check user configuration page."What should I do.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Did you put enable:true in your huggle.css? Versus22_talk 20:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Where is it located I couldn't find the link on huggle's page.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

DoneAll vandal beware.ThanksUser:Yousaf465 (talk)

Want to be an admin?

Hi, I've been watching your contributions for a while, and I must say you are an impressive vandal fighter (over 1,000 edits some days!). Have you ever considered becoming an administrator? If you're interested, just reply to this and I would be glad to nominate you. Cool3 (talk) 17:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I think I'll go for it in a couple months (maybe nom me by then?). I don't think I stand a chance now, since I've only been on Huggle basically the last few days. Thanks for the offer though! Versus22_talk 17:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing, I'll give you another shout out in a couple months. Cool3 (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism

2 of the last 3 things I tried to revert, you beat me to it. Good work :) Doc Tropics 22:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks!

Wouldn't you know it. No sooner do I log off than some middle schooler with a filthy mouth cuts loose on my talk page. Thanks for the reversion. BTW, I caught your message re. the Simple Wikipedia. I used to edit it, but I quit a few years ago because of a very contentious user. I'd requested adminship soon after I'd gotten it here and he fired back with a barrage of insults. I basically told him where to go. :) Since I understand that user is no longer affiliated with that project, I'd like to revisit the possibility. Can you leave word on my talk page? FWIW, I not only administer here, but on the Christmas specials wiki and the radio control wiki where I'm a b'crat. Thanks! Looking forward to hearing from you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

sandi thom

Hi versus22, how do ?

I'm a brand new wiki user, still finding my feet a little.

Ive been trying to make changes to the singer sandi thom's page but with no luck. The page as it stands is a smear campaign designed to embarass and ridicule sandi thom and her music, im trying to make positive changes and present the truth.

I have left edit summaries with each step, be they concerned with punctuation, spelling,re-working paragraphs, removing erroneous info and adding factual info.

The page as it stands has been written by someone with far more wiki user experience and computer knowledge than myself, there are a lot of cited sources and references etc, all negative press about sandi thom . it is a very well researched and presented page with an obvious negative opinion of sandi thom.

i would like to present her in a positive and fair way, i would like to make serious alterations to this page, involving deleting most of what is currently on the page.

if you have a minute, please take a look at the page and see for yourself how anti-sandi it really is.

many thanks

Daschund (talk) 23:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Michael Stipe's Homosexuality

You deleted my reference to Michael Stipe's homosexuality in the Saved! calling it "not constructive"!! What is "not constructive" about it???? The film clearly takes a political stance against Christian evangelicals, and their alleged hatred of gays. The fact that Stipe and the other producer are both very publicly gay is very relevant to the article. The fact that the film chastises Evangelicals for their stand on Homosexuals is not a matter of dispute.

Not to mention that Stipe is gay is absurd. He is public about that fact, it is mentioned on R.E.M.'s wiki entry as well as Stipe's wiki entry.

In regards to the article, there are readers who may be unaware of Stipe's sexual preference, and this defacto omission ends up making the article incomplete and seems to be an example of absurd political correctness. Stipe's gayness clearly effects his politics and this film clearly is, at the very least, biased against some groups of Christians.

If you feel the way Stipe's sexuality was broached in the article was not constructive, perhaps there is a point there, but his political viewpoints and his pro-gay activism is totally relevant when it comes to a film that has been accused of being anti Christian.

The fact that you deleted the reference as not being constructive, but do not explain why you feel that way, and what specifically is "not constructive" about it shows a lack of respect in my opinion. Maybe that is not how you intended it. (24.62.100.100 (talk) 00:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC))

That revert wasn't supposed to happen, as my school's computer was skipping more than one diff at a time (I use an automated program, and it freezes at a fair amount of places. I saw your edit summary, and almost all the time I don't do anything, unless it's not a valid reason. Sorry for the inconvenience...I removed the warning. Best, Versus22_talk 01:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

The brontosaurus article

The brontosaurus article previously and incorrectly referred to the dinosaur as "apatosaurus." I have corrected this error. 158.59.247.122 (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Simple English, part deux. :)

I had the global enabled on my account as well, so I just reestablished myself at Simple and directed my old account to the new one. Thanks for the invitation! This will be fun. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll see you over there sometime, maybe we can do some stuff together. I'm hoping to be admin over there someday as well. Cheers, Versus22_talk 17:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

... for reverting vandalism at my talkpage. =) --guyzero | talk 16:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Have a nice day! :) Versus22_talk 17:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry!

Didn't mean to revert your edit on Sureños, we both got to it at the same time! Sir (talk) 16:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I actually didn't know that other IP put vandalism in there as well, so I fixed it. No worries though about your revert! :) Versus22_talk 17:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts Re: Chain of Memories

What are you doing according to FantasyDragon this game isn't coming out in Europe, I'm just protecting kids and teenagers from getting their hopes up because he knows all about Kingdom Hearts and said it wasn't coming out to protect me from getting my hopes up, if you have a problem with my edit talk with him because I've been having a bad day and I'm just trying to pass on his protective news, vgrelease is as unreliable as another Wiki or a British gaming magazine.

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Do you ever, ever sleep? :D Brilliant work with Huggle, keep it up dude! cf38^talk 13:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Why do you keep unfairly editing?

All I am trying to do is correct the post on ZOG to show a few of the many Political Action Committees that the article pertains to but does not mention.

I copied most of the information From wikipedia.... I guess you guys are becoming such information Nazi's and thought police that the truth is not to be allowed in a post.

Young Jewish Leadership PAC (YJLPAC) - Jewish Republicans supporting pro-Israel federal candidates for Congress. Chapters in New York City -- http://www.yjlpac.org -- and Washington, DC -- http://www.yjlpac.org/dc

613PAC - Orthodox Jewish Political Action Committee 613PAC

AIPAC - America's Pro-Israel Lobby Working to strengthen the U.S.-Israel relationship. Offers Middle East news, analysis and resources for policymakers, media, students and activists. http://www.aipac.org

Jewish Political Action Committee Thank you for your interest in JPAC, the Jewish Political Action Committee of Massachusetts. ... Jewish Political Action Committee. 8 Winter Street, 12th Floor ... http://www.jewishpac.org

J Street is a Jewish nonprofit advocacy group based in the United States that promotes meaningful American leadership to end the Arab-Israeli and Palestinian-Israel conflicts peacefully and diplomatically. J Street supports a... http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/J_Street_Political_Action_Committee

You are removing Valid information and calling it vandalism. Perhaps a class action law suit would bring Wikipedia to disallow such fascism. TiredofPropaganda (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

No I'm not. It is in an improper format and in the wrong spot. I gave an editing tests warning about it (I assume you're that IP?). Please do it properly, and not totally messy, okay? Versus22_talk 22:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, if it does not belong in See Also, or in outside links, where do you propose the information should go? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TiredofPropaganda (talk • contribs) 22:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Australian Handball

There has been a quite comprehensive article on this subject [also via Downball] for over 2 years now. As a long-standing physical educator, my own professional involvement and even my personal history with this game has spanned some 40 to 50 years. The article, as has been previously constituted, has been quite useful, comparatively accurate and highly informative to researchers or young people interested in the subject and the game in its entirety. For some reason, someone has completely ditched the original work of all these other people and previous editors, and simply raised his own, extremely limited version and understanding of things as 'Gospel'. Can you please revert article to the original acknowledging the countless hours of work which the many previous editors have invested into the 'Australian Handball' article? Thankyou - Denidowi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.27.246 (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I reverted your edit because you copied and pasted from another article (with the (edit) links). Please don't do that, write it in your own words. Versus22_talk 22:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm completely surprised by your reverts on the edits I made to the Glen D. Johnson, Jr. page. None of the information was incorrect, none was opinion, and one revert replaced a corrected spelling edit back to the incorrect spelling. Bulldogs777 (talk) 01:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

The year of birth was the reason why I reverted that, but I think that was the only problem, so I should have not done that. Thanks for letting me know (Hmm... I should pay more attention...)

Note: - I removed the warning from that IP page. Versus22_talk 03:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction on the Glen D. Johnson, Jr. article! Keep up the good work! Bulldogs777 (talk) 01:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! --Susan118 (talk) 23:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

And for undoing vandalism to my talk page. Much appreciated. 99.184.128.247 (talk) 23:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Acebulf (talk) 23:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

You are good!

		The Original Barnstar
		Great job with the vandalism. I wish I was fast as you! Cheers. BoomerAB (talk) 00:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Rod Dreher

Um.. why did you continually add that category back in? Quite frankly it looks like it should've been removed. Wizardman 03:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't get why he was blanking the page a number of times here. I was judging by the other user's reverts. Versus22_talk 03:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

His blanking the page was wrong, but in the ones where he was removing the cats, it sounds like you were blind-reverting without even looking at the contrib, which is exactly what huggle's not for. No harm done, just a warning to be more careful with the tool. Wizardman 03:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I started doing that after Until It Sleeps reverted the removal of the category. Versus22_talk 03:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

"When [an anonymous or recently-registered user] blanks all or part of a biography of a living person, it is important to remember that this may be an attempt by the subject of the article to remove problematic material. If this appears to be the case then such an edit should not be treated as vandalism. Instead, the editor should be welcomed and invited to explain his/her concerns with the article." That's likely why he was blanking it. Daniel (talk) 03:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

PS: Those reverts were shocking. Irregardless of whatever had transpired before, reverting to restore a category which accuses a living person of pederasty is just totally not on. You must be accountable for your own reverts, especially on living people. Daniel (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

It won't happen again (my reverts) for those category removals. Versus22_talk 04:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I trust blindly reverting a BLP which has been blanked by a new user without thoroughly reviewing the contents won't happen either. Daniel (talk) 04:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I must admit, that I was also reverting based on other reverts, and this may have caused Versus22 to make the same mistake as I did. I take responsibility for this little mess that was created, and apologize to the parties involved. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 16:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hey Versus!

Just FYI, I have blocked 92.40.0.0/16 for 72 hours, so his fun should be over. If he gets onto another range, do you want me to just protect, or do you want me to wait and see if I can hammer in another rangeblock? J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hammer one more then protect after. Versus22_talk 22:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Lyme disease

I made no such edit to the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.34.58 (talk) 01:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Just to let you know that this is an IP address, which means that it may have been used by another person to make that edit. Versus22_talk 01:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk semiprotection

Hey Versus, I've protected this page for three days after a request was made at WP:RFPP. It looks like you've been getting hammered pretty good lately. If you'd like the protection to be longer, or shorter, or not at all, just let me know. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Note: Commented at User talk:Bongwarrior. Versus22_talk 19:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome

And thank you for my first barnstar, I'm very excited! J04n (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thank you! :)

You're very welcome! I'm glad to see that pernicious vandalizing twit got blocked eventually. Also, thanks for the barnstar; it really made my day! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 00:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the help with that vandal on Simple.Wikipedia! Having your talk page redirect here is going to be a pain when sending you messages. Cheers, Razor flame 06:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Okay my simple discussion is back. Sorry. Versus22_talk 06:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

No problems. Cheers, Razor flame 07:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Your edits

Hi Versus. Can I ask you to refrain from making edits like this please? I understand your frustration, but that is not helping the situation at all. I believe you've been warned about this in the past, so please refrain from doing so. It gives Grawp a kick as well and sends the IRC bots crazy! :) Thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, sorry. I won't do that anymore.. Versus22_talk 20:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Cheers. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion

"User:Versus22/About" has been deleted. Bearian (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay thanks! I'm sorry again about that comment. I will not say anything about that from now on. Versus22_talk 22:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: User:Havehopey'all

Already Done by PeterSymonds (talk · contribs). Cheers, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

No I want it deleted (his talk page). Users can still see it in the diffs. Versus22_talk 17:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

my talk

Thank you for creating a talk archive for me. Cheers! --199.71.174.100 (talk) 23:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem! It was getting pretty long, so I archived it all until the 2009 discussion. :) Best, Versus22_talk 23:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I though that you could use one after all the drama with your own page Shinerunner (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

That just reminded me how important I am at the project. Thanks! :) Versus22_talk 23:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

User Page

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my User Page a while back! --Climax Void ☭. —Preceding undated comment added 20:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC).

Question

I noticed this edit you made (reverting multiple users). How do you do that? I've searched the Huggle manual and couldn't find it anywhere. Thanks, Little Mountain 5 ^review! 16:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

You just go back to the previous (bad) revision and push the red circle or the R button. :) Versus22_talk 16:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, that's simple enough! Thanks, Little Mountain 5 ^review! 16:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

vandelism

I keep making a constructive edit to a particular page and you keep reverting it even though my edit is 100% OK!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.37.3.227 (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I haven't reverted your edits other than the one in December. Versus22_talk 16:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Thats BS b/c you reverted a change I made on the Queer as Folk (North American Series) to make it politically correct. What article did you revert in December of mine? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.37.3.227 (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

My name is not even in the history (50 recent edits) of the Queer as Folk (North American TV series). Versus22_talk 16:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Well it showed up on my computer screen. Thats how I found you. Please help me correct the article by inserting (five "homosexual" men) instead of "gay". and also (frank depiction of "alternative lifestyles"). This would be the politically correct way of putting the SAME information instead of being highly offensive to people like myself. Im sorry for the comments earlier its just your sn showed up. IDK why. I dont even know what "greatsword" is so, I dont mind that reversion. :) Thanks Could you help me with this? TreyGeek keeps changing it to be offensive. Very much appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.37.3.227 (talk) 16:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

How do I appeal to wikipedia.org and have them prevent the reversions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.37.3.227 (talk) 17:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Use the article's talk page to bring up what needs to be improved for that article. Versus22_talk 17:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I did this but he kept reverting it anyways. Can I block him from making reversions to this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Navyboi7 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

OK... instead of keeping on doing those actions you should bring it up to the article's talk page rather than trying to edit war with other users. Edit warring is not a good thing to do, because it is disruptive and it really fills up various logs. What you want to do is try to reach consensus with others. Best, Versus22_talk 17:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Birthday

Thank you very much for wishing me my Bday!! Can you tell me which code you used to Display following text Regards--Suyog ^{talk to me!} 11:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Welcome to my user talk page!

Please read this before commenting:

Sign your comments by using four tides (Suyog ^{talk to me!} 11:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)). Please add a level 2 header (== Example ==). You can also do this by clicking on the new section tab right beside change this page. Please be kind. Any bad comments and personal attacks will be removed. I will reply here, so make sure you add my talk page to your watchlist. Also, if I start a discussion on your talk, I would like it if you replied there. Note: Anyone who chooses to vandalize my page please go ahead, it will be changed back right away. However, you will recieve a warning which may soon get yourself blocked.

Thanks for reading! Versus22 talk

You're welcome! I hope you enjoy it. About that message I have above, you create a Editnotice page (either your user or user talk page). It allows you to put in a message for users, and then once it's saved, that message will show up when you click edit this page in your main user and/or user talk page. You can also read WP:EDITNOTICE for more info. Best, Versus22_talk 14:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Protection of Peter Jones

I'm guessing you're an admin and I'd like to make some suggestions about the Peter Jones (entrepreneur) page as I have noticed several problems with it

1. I'd like to suggest placing a semi-protection notice on it due to persistant vandlism (i.e calling him a c*** and a racist)

2. 1 of the main vandles is 93.97.240.44, I'd like to request that he be blocked due to his vandlism

Please tell me what you think The C of E (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

No, I'm actually not an admin, sorry! However, you can send a request for page protection here. Thanks! :) Versus22_talk 16:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Can you explain the vandalism at Newhall? Seems that someone needs a ban, do you agree? Victuallers (talk) 16:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes. I reverted this edit because the IP put in f***nuts, which I really thought it was an unconstructive edit. Versus22_talk 22:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the cleanup

Thanks for taking care of the trash on my talk page. Cheers! Monkey Bounce (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem. Best, Versus22_talk 21:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk:66.229.250.178

This guy is so persistant, I expedited everything and went to AIV not just for 3RR violations but for making a legal threat here Momusufan (talk) 17:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I didn't like it that he called you a vandal, as you do good work here. Also, what is wrong with a WHOIS tag? Versus22_talk 17:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with the whois tag, I was only identifying which ISP it belonged to. Thats public information. Momusufan (talk) 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes I know. However, they seem that it shows their name... it doesn't. I think it just shows the provider. I don't know why the IP is so attached to that. Versus22_talk 17:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I got no idea, anyway I made a report at ANI. Momusufan (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure it will be interesting. Versus22_talk 17:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

It was quickly done, IP Blocked for making the legal threat. Momusufan (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)