User talk:VedikaThorat

January 2021

Hello, I'm Njd-de. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dhananjay Munde, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. NJD-DE (talk) 10:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GreaterPonce665. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dhananjay Munde without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 23:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dhananjay Munde, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 17:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume ownership of articles, as you did at Dhananjay Munde, you may be blocked from editing. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 15:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dhananjay Munde

Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and have to preserve its characters as such. The language must be neutral and shouldn't contain any personal views. We aren't here to write an essay. Akshaypatill (talk) 11:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's edit this content with a rational and unbiased view. If any information seems unreliable please contact/leave a message on each other's talk pages. I am making changes in the original content also trying to find citations for the same. Please do not get personal with editors during the process. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahesh Karve (talk • contribs) 09:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, else I will report you. You have already been warned by others.

Your recent editing history at Dhananjay Munde shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Reported at WP:SPI

Dhananjay Munde (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Mahesh Karve (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Your post claiming to know what Mr. Munde wants in his article
WP:Sockpuppet investigations/VedikaThorat

Hello VedikaThorat. Your account has been reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VedikaThorat. It seems that you and Mahesh Karve (talk · contribs) might be the same person, or perhaps two people working in close collaboration. The policy concerned is WP:SOCK. It would help if you can say anything to clarify your possible off-wiki relationship with Mahesh Karve (talk · contribs). The two of you have been making similar edits to Dhananjay Munde. Since you have claimed to know what Mr. Munde wants in his article (see above) can you please tell us what your connection is to Dhananjay Munde? Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VedikaThorat. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cabayi (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]