User talk:Varenx101

Varenx101, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Varenx101! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Removing sourced content

When you selectively remove sourced content from an article and other editors disagree with you and restore the content—as has been the case on List of largest empires in India, Maurya Empire, and Gupta Empire—you should discuss the matter on the article's talk page instead of simply reinstating your changes. In these particular cases, WP:Reliable sources disagree with each other, as they sometimes do. When that happens, what we do is note that the sources disagree and present the disagreement neutrally (see WP:YESPOV) instead of picking the viewpoint of one of the sources as the preferred one. For each of these articles, you have removed a peer-reviewed scientific article specifically about the territorial extents of historical polities, which is about as WP:RELIABLE a source as it gets for this particular type of information. TompaDompa (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Gupta Empire. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing sourced content and instead discuss it on the talk page(s)

You have been repeatedly asked not to remove sourced content and instead discuss it on the relevant talk pages. I have now started talk page discussions at Talk:Maurya Empire#Removal of sourced content by User:Varenx101 and Talk:List of largest empires in India#Disruptive edits by User:Varenx101. Please join these discussions instead of repeatedly removing the content you disagree with. TompaDompa (talk) 12:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at List of largest empires in India. Dl2000 (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent removal of sourced content after repeated warnings

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Maurya Empire. You have been asked several times to use the talk page when your edits removing sourced content have been reverted by other editors. Please do so instead of reinstating your edits without discussion. TompaDompa (talk) 01:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Your recent editing history at List of largest empires in India shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 21:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 21:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the next block is likely to be indef per WP:NOTHERE. --RegentsPark (comment) 21:34, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 00:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]