User talk:Vanished user 325896

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Please fix existing problems while you edit

I have been fixing a series of bad edits by an IP editor that "doesn't like Pinyin". I noticed these two changes that you happened to do after the IP had broken the romanizations.

While you are changing things, could you also be checking that things look correct? Otherwise you may accidentally be endorsing/approving bad edits.

First example "Jhongkwóh Iyàu Tàhhsuéh" is not Pinyin. It was changed from "Zhōngguó Yīyào Dàxué". If I can tell the difference - what looks like Pinyin and what doesn't - you should be able to. Please look at the text while you are cut-n-pasting.

The second example sees that you recognized that something was wrong with

Although its English name is [[China Medical University (ROC)|the same as a university]] in [[Shenyang]], [[Republic of China]], the Chinese name of the mainland university is different: 中國醫科大學.

You fixed "Republic of China" but didn't see the "ROC" problem. Again, check the IP editor's changes.

I don't want to sound "loud" about this, but we all need to be watching very closely at every text we look at. I have found vandalism that was 2.5 years old, simply by seeing something that didn't look right. If you are changing a lot of articles, you have lots of chances to fix problems! :-) Shenme (talk) 05:40, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen#Requested move 13 December 2016

You participated in one of previous RMs. I invite you to another RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 20:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen#Name in infobox

I started an RFC at Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen#Name in infobox. I invite you to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 11:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your last edit to Lam Woon-kwong

Hello!

Is it necessary to have the "Contains Chinese" box on this page? I normally wouldn't care, but because the existing infobox is so long (perhaps too long), the gap between the References section and the succession boxes is huge.

Tiny quibble! —A L T E R C A R I ✍ 04:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- I think since it's reasonable to assume this article is still incomplete (standard assumption for all articles on here) that it may seem too far to scroll at the moment, but as the article is fleshed out, this will cease to be an issue. Also, since the article 'does' contain Chinese text, this marker is necessary. 05:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Hong Kong Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Central

Land Registry (Hong Kong) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Queensway

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Yen Chow Street Hawker Bazaar

Hi, I'm Abishe. Kdm852, thanks for creating Yen Chow Street Hawker Bazaar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Hello Kdm852: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dr & Mrs Hung Hin Shiu Museum of Chinese Medicine

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Kdm852, thanks for creating Dr & Mrs Hung Hin Shiu Museum of Chinese Medicine!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese infobox

Thanks for adding to Ma Liu Shui! I do think that in HK place articles there should be both Traditional and Simplified forms in the Chinese infobox and Cantonese, Hakka, and Putonghua/Mandarin all included. One thing I wish is that when the infobox is expanded, that Cantonese is put up top with Hakka second and Mandarin third in the case of Hong Kong articles (to make it clear that Cantonese is dominant in HK). I might propose that in the infobox talk page.

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 13:49, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template_talk:Infobox_Chinese#Reversing_the_order_of_Mandarin,_Cantonese,_and_Hakka_in_the_case_of_Hong_Kong_and_Macau_articles? WhisperToMe (talk) 13:52, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit I'm aware HK doesn't use simplified (I currently live in Shenzhen and participate in the Wikimedia HK Usergroup) but my understanding is that simplified should be shown anyway to teach non-Chinese users what is the simplified form versus the traditional form. AFAIK all China and Sinosphere (SARs, Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore, Overseas)-related topics should show both forms in the infobox, and with Mainland topics I show the traditional forms. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and started Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/China_and_Chinese-related_articles#Should_the_Chinese_infobox_display_both_Simplified_and_Traditional_Chinese_for_all_Greater_China_and/or_Sinosphere-related_subjects,_or_should_it_only_display_the_relevant_ones_per_territory/area? WhisperToMe (talk) 17:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, WhisperToMe. However, the discussion I was hoping to have was whether to use each script generally in an article depending on the subject matter, not just in the infobox (although this would definitely be part of it).

A page you started (Great China Match Company Factory) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Great China Match Company Factory, Kdm852!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

An interesting article.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Hong Kong English"

I note that you have just generated a boilerplate message on my Talk page. The message has been generated by you in response to my reversal of your addition of a language warning on the ALLinHK talk page. The message says that I "changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another". Since it was your edit which performed that very action, it is evident that you could not have intended to issue this particular message; perhaps there was another you might have wanted to use or perhaps you had intended the message for someone else? sirlanz 05:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I note you are not happy with the inclusion of the word "spoken" in the lede though you have failed twice to provide any edit summary for your Undo action. I invite you to explain what aspect of the reason I gave when making the edit was incorrect. If you believe the scope of Hong Kong English goes wider than just an oral form, then the article can first be enhanced to include material establishing that fact. Once that has been done, the lede can go back to an all-encompassing term. Perhaps you would like to make that contribution? sirlanz 06:05, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sirlanz, My comment was left, if you look closely. I marked them with "RV" which is wikipedia shorthand for 'revert vandalism'. Your edit appears to me to have been made in bad faith and done to justify your edits made elsewhere rather than the merits of the article. If you wish to suggest that English in HK is a spoken form only, then it is you who needs to justify the change to the article. You cannot establish fact by fiat. As I have repeatedly stated, the Manual of Style on Wikipedia includes the use of national varieties of English where appropriate. If you have a problem with this policy, I suggest you take it up on the policy talk page. Kdm852 (talk) 06:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One can hardly fail to notice your studious addition of the Use Hong Kong English admonition to all and sundry pages having anything to do with Hong Kong. I maintain that this is an undesirable discouragement to the freedom of thought and action of editors because there is no instance in which you have added the admonition where it has any practical relevance. I invite you to demonstrate one instance in any one of the hundreds(?) of such articles so tagged by you where a choice of word or structure requires prior consideration of the relative positions of "Hong Kong English" and, say, British English (the pertinent example as, according to sourced material appearing on the Hong Kong English page, that is the dominant English form in Hong Kong). And in case you have brushing this off as you did our previous encounter, the onus is squarely on you to justify your additions to WP pages and if they cannot be justified, they must be removed. sirlanz 15:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sirlanz, the onus is not on me to justify adhering to the Manual of Style to everyone who disagrees with it. You tried to bring this discussion to the talk page on the MoS and no consensus was reached to bring the manual in line with your view. As a result, I will continue to follow the current policy of using local varieties of English for region-specific pages. I have no interest in restarting this discussion with you again from the beginning. Either convince the community, or accept the consensus. Kdm852 (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On substance: Nothing to say on substance? Only interested in hiding behind form? A consensus is achieved only after substantive discussion. In the absence of such engagement from you, there is no exchange of views and no basis for consensus. As a starting point to an intelligent debate, I have asked for just one example from what must be some tens of thousands of words, just one? Or is it simply too much for you to face up to the fact that all that adding of tags has, at best, contributed nothing at all to the encyclopaedia?

On form: Where do you get the idea that the Manual of Style supports your slavish addition of the warning to all Hong Kong pages? The MOS stresses universality in choice of English style and impresses on us that we are writing for an international, not parochial audience. Even if you were able to come up with evidence of a specific written form of Hong Kong English relevant to this encyclopaedia, on what basis do you suggest that the MOS supports your using it? sirlanz 04:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sirlanz, All the issues you raise have been addressed to you in previous discussions. It is not my job to explain the reasons behind the MoS to you ad infinitum. The fact that you continue to carry on this discussion on my user page, rather than on the Talk page of the MoS, even though neither of us makes the policy on this site, leads me to suspect that you are simply trolling at this point. Kdm852 (talk) 07:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here's your last chance to address the point instead of ducking it. Tell us how the HKE admonition assists an editor in the selection of "honour" or "honor" in contributing to an article. Fundamental underpinnings to language tags are the ideas that they help to achieve consistency in the articles and they serve to resolve conflict between editors. How does your tag achieve either of those goals?

I have pursued this on your page because (1) you are the only editor carrying this HKE tag banner; (2) the MOS is a huge article dealing with myriad issues; and (3) almost no one monitoring that page either is interested or equipped to contribute to this HKE question (as past disinterest in this has demonstrated). So stop ducking, try to address the specifics. sirlanz 07:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sirlanz I am not ducking the point. I have answered all these questions and more in earlier discussions (as I said previously) and am tired of repeating myself. This is not a discussion to be had between the two of us, so I recommend posting either in the MoS Talk page, or on the HK Wikiproject page. Kdm852 (talk) 08:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For your convenience, questions repeatedly ignored: Provide one example of a page where you have added the tag where there is content that requires the use of some kind of English unique to Hong Kong; explain how the tag assists an editor in choosing between "honour" and "honor" in his/her editing work. sirlanz 08:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Letter from Wikimedia User Group Hong Kong

Dear Kdm852,

Sorry for being too late (due to much undue tasks), but still thanks for your interest in our user group. We would like to invite you to an IRC channel (#wikimedia-hk ^connect) or its Telegram counterpart (contact me or 1233 for access) for discussions on community matters, as you wish.

Yours sincerely,

Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 14:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HK01 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, HK01, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reversion without summary

Hi. I note you have just reverted my edit to Talk:Equal Opportunities Commission (Hong Kong) without explanation. I am therefore reverting your action. Please kindly observe the important protocol of explaining actions, particularly edit reversions. If the edit summary space is not sufficient for you, add a Talk entry where you can express yourself fully. Thank you. sirlanz 09:24, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HK01 (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HK01 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:HK01, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kdm852! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HK01 has been accepted

HK01, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 21:41, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Centennial College (Hong Kong)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Centennial College (Hong Kong).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 03:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Safe Space Policy for the Hong Kong User Group

To ensure a safe, friendly, inclusive and harassment-free environment for all future events, it is proposed that a Safe Space Policy shall be established by the User Group.

The full proposed policy is posted at meta:Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong/Safe Space Policy.

A consultation on the proposed policy is currently conducted. During the consultation period, please voice your opinion on the discussion thread in Meta. The proposed policy would come in effect on 22 May 2019 if no objections are raised by the user group members.

Regards, --無聊龍 (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A "Hoeng Gong" kitten for you!

Good work writing articles about Hong Kong constituencies!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peng Chau Kaito Ltd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peng Chau Kaito Ltd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peng Chau Kaito Ltd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 06:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

== Just copy the source code and paste it on the talk page of the user you wish to invite.

This user has been invited WikiProject Prussia please consider checking us out.

==

(:

Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics has been accepted

Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 20:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tai Yau Bank Limited for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tai Yau Bank Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tai Yau Bank Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your request on Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Requests

Your two requests on Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Requests are fulfilled and archived:

~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 15:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to coming Hong Kong virtual meetup: 19 September (SUN), 20:00 UTC+8

Hi Vanished user 325896,

I am reaching out to you because you signed up to be a member of Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong.

We will be hosting the next virtual meetup to discuss the annual report and future arrangements on election of the board. The event will take place on Sunday, September 19, at 20:00 HKT (1200 UTC), and the presentation will be in both Cantonese and English.

If you are unable attend, you can also submit questions and suggestions before the meeting at our telegram group.

The link to the meeting room is here: virtual meeting room link.

We hope to have you join us online!

（第一百二十八屆香港聚會將會喺今年9月19日夜晚8點開始！到時撳依條拎一齊入去開會啦！）

--MediaWiki message delivery（留言） 2021年9月12日 (日) 17:50 (UTC)

Please update your subscription to these messages by clicking here.

Also, Thanks Temp3600 for his hard works.

Nomination of Hindu Association of Hong Kong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu Association of Hong Kong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Association of Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]