User talk:Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h/historical archive/2014
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Potrdeta Kangtoa Elotraden dre Gwikqkiqkpaeditya's listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Potrdeta Kangtoa Elotraden dre Gwikqkiqkpaeditya's. Since you had some involvement with the Potrdeta Kangtoa Elotraden dre Gwikqkiqkpaeditya's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg (chat) 11:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive
It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:
- This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
- Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
- The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
- An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.
Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.
More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.
I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!
--Dom497
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive
The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Playlist: The Very Best of Rick Astley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playlist: The Very Best of Rick Astley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playlist: The Very Best of Rick Astley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Cheer C.P.S. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheer C.P.S. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheer C.P.S. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zanhe (talk) 23:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PlaylistRick.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PlaylistRick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Japanio listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanio. Since you had some involvement with the Japanio redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 07:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Chaillan
Nothing's gonna make me change my mind that you're only here to promote yourself, Nicolas. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Diego, please stop making deletion requests for the article about Nicolas Chaillan. We are actually working on adding new releases as we speak. We've already confirmed his notability and we will improve it in the next 2 weeks. 4 contributors agreed with us and approved this article so please, do not make all our work go away before we have a chance to update it in the next few days? Thank you. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.88.85.97 (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
You're better stop modifying the page of Nicolas Chaillan to try to make him look ridiculous or I will make sure he officially contact the Wikipedia Foundation to report your behavior. A 19 years old kid should stay at school and not trying to bother adults. You should listen to me very carefully because this is going to go out of control now. This is my last warning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom.lindpen (talk • contribs) 05:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC) |
Eugenio Cruz Vargas
Estimado Diego ( Vi que usted es de Chile por eso le escribo en español) La fuente de Referencia de este artista Scribd esta escrita y editada por el Instituto Cultural de Providencia , donde pone Biografia de Chilenos destacados, usted la puede ver aqui [[1]], Tiene 6 paginas donde sale todo lo descrito en el articulo antes mencionado. Por favor ver esto que es una fuente primaria del Instituto Cultural de Providencia, donde este artista desarrollo principalmente su Carrera artistica , como lo relata plenamente este articulo La Fuente Angelfire es una web donde solo muestra la obra pictorica de este artista, si ustede considera oportuno se puede eliminar. La Fuente del Mercurio es corta por que solo muestra los ultimos eventos de es artista exposiciones y lanzamiento. Los articulos anteriores de criticas este artista estan en papel y no en la Web son muchas y multiples de 40 años de Carrera artistica. Est lo menciona la fuente del Instituto Cultural de Providencia
Esperando su reconsideración y respuesta lo Saluda a usted
--Historiador1923 (talk) 12:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Estimado Diego
Le agrege a este articulo 4 referencias más
Espero tu respuesta Muchas Gracias
--Historiador1923 (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Gracias estimado Diego
--Historiador1923 (talk) 22:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara
Estimado Diego
Por favor reanalizar el borrado propuesto, debido a que en el articulo hay dos referencias que muestran su importancia enciclopedica como critic literario y estas son las siguientes:
[Study on Chilean literature, 1940, foreword Pastene written by M. Correa, October 1940] [History of Literature Illustrated Francisco A. Encina, written by Leopoldo Castedo, vol. 11, pp. 144-152]
Esto usted lo puede colaborar recurriendo a estos textos indicados. En cuanto a la biblioteca del Congreso esta solo muestra algunas obras de este critic literario , pero no asi su biografia que esta en las referencias anteriormente descritas
Muchas gracias y espero su reconsideracion
--Historiador1923 (talk) 13:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Con esos nombres no hay ningún libro ni en la Biblioteca Nacional ni en la biblioteca de la Facultad de Humanidades de la U. de Chile. Lo siento, pero la proposición sigue. Aparte, los artículos están escritos terriblemente. ¿Los has traducido con Google Translate? Hay varias palabras en español entremedio, mal escritas. Diego Grez (talk) 15:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Estimado Diego
Te adjunto Link con estos Libro de 1926 que es este [[2]] y este otro es este postumo de 1944 [[3]] y el de Francisco Antonio Encina escrito por Leopoldo Castedo se encuentra en el Archivo del Museo Historico Nacional , en la Biblioteca de los Padres Francesces de la Alameda, en la Biblioteca de la Ilustre Municipalidad de Providencia y en la Bibioteca de la Ilustre Municipalidad del Las Condes.
Puedes recurrir a esos centros y solicitarlos.
Muy amable y muchas gracias
--Historiador1923 (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Perdona Diego y busque en la WEB y están a la venta el siguiente libro de este Critico Literario que es este [[4]] este otro lo puedes encontrar en la Biblioteca Nacional [[5]] y este otro articulo que trata sobre este autor Marta Brunett [[6]].
Nuevamente muchas gracias por tu valiosa colaboración
Un gran abrazo de tu compañero Chileno
--Historiador1923 (talk) 20:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hispana lingvo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hispana lingvo. Since you had some involvement with the Hispana lingvo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 06:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Memoria Chilena
It would be very useful if you tell the "purpose" of keeping an old screenshot of the website, instead of a more recent look of that. --Sfs90 (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
File:DOSBOX Windows 3.1.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DOSBOX Windows 3.1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 00:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Edit War
lol, I have been reverting a vandal and get this. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Your recent editing history at José Piñera shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Turgan Talk 22:47, 4 July 2014 (UTC) |
Differing opinions on wording does not make vandalism. Protection from the WP:3RR rule only applies to clear cases of vandalism. Turgan Talk 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Credo
Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Escuela Digna Camilo Aguilar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Escuela Digna Camilo Aguilar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escuela Digna Camilo Aguilar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 22:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Pichilemu News logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Pichilemu News logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Idioma japonés listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Idioma japonés. Since you had some involvement with the Idioma japonés redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 03:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Freelang.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Freelang.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Freelangnet.png
Thanks for uploading File:Freelangnet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
Your recent editing history at David H. Greer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —LucasThoms 17:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive
Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!
TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.
If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.
At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.
As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!
Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Article
Thanks --Historiador1923 (talk) 14:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Idioma portugués listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Idioma portugués. Since you had some involvement with the Idioma portugués redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 04:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
GA Cup
Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!
As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:
For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.
For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).
The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.
--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey!
Hey Diego, good to see you're still around. I've not seen much of you, so I assume you're keeping out of trouble? ;) All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hey HJ! Good thing you're still around too! I've tried to remain a gnome these days, so yes! I'm out of trouble :P Regards, --Diego Grez (talk) 02:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles - GA Cup
WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers. Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges. Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC) To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.
|
Feisbuk listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feisbuk. Since you had some involvement with the Feisbuk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 10:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day
- Oh, thanks Anastacia! Eight years around... Diego Grez (talk) 01:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Indonezio listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indonezio. Since you had some involvement with the Indonezio redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 06:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring at Nueva Mayoría
If you continue edit warring on the Nueva Mayoría article you will be blocked from editing. Stay on the talk page and discuss the change. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:41, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Tell that to the other user, I have suggested them several times to keep the discussion on the talk page and not to edit war. --Diego Grez (talk) 16:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Que Levante La Mano
Hi there Diego Grez, long time no see! I had thought you left Wikipedia a while ago until I saw your move at Hector el Father thanks to the Latin music article log. Anyways, I don't know if you still contribute to Chilean music, but I wanted to bring your attention to Que Levante La Mano where I expanded the article to include information about the original artist who sang it and stuff. Cheers! Erick (talk) 05:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hey Erick! I'm sorry I didn't see this earlier, good to see you around too. I'm not that much active nowadays, but still look into my watchlist regularly. Just looked at Que levante la mano, and looks great now that you've expanded it. I'd like to expand the Americo section at some point... maybe in early December, as I'll be done with exams and will have enough spare time to go to the library and read some 2007-2008 newspapers. Regards, Diego Grez (talk) 02:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- That would be great! Chile (and a lot of Spanish-speaking countries in South America) are so underrepresented in the project so it'd be good to see diversity. I can upload music samples if you any requests as well. Erick (talk) 02:51, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Curco Vein
Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hoops gza (talk) 16:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Firstly, you have applied a wrong tag, as Kurt Cobain has been dead since 1994, and so I will ignore the accusations in your automatically-added notification. Curco Vein was, back in 2012 -IIRC- the name given to Kurt Cobain in the form of a meme (in Spanish-speaking countries), in social networks, making fun of his death. Indeed, I don't agree with this mocking, but when I created the redirect I thought it would be useful to use that "stylized" name to point to the article of the aforementioned musician. After all, Curco Vein refers to Kurt Cobain. Diego Grez (talk) 16:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eugenio Cruz Vargas. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree. I was just givin Historiador advice for him not to add again copyvios. Of that was not a good thing for me to do, then I dont know what could be (editing from a public space) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.27.18.242 (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Latin music proposal guideline
Hello Diego! You are an invited to discuss on a proposed guideline which would make it a project standard to use capitalization found on English-language reliable sources for titles of Spanish- and Portuguese-language albums and songs as opposed to its native capitalization. Cheers! Erick (talk) 17:48, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Will have a look at it, regards! --Diego Grez (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks your comment! I feel sufficient time and supports are enough to include it on the guidelines section so I have added it. Next time you have to deal with a user insisting Spanish-language albums or songs using it native capitalization, kindly point them to the guideline or the discussion on the talk page. =) Erick (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Curco Vein
Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hoops gza (talk) 00:31, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hoops gza, you know that Kurt Cobain is dead, right? Everything I said in your previous deletion nomination still stands, and until you get to discuss this "negative in tone" redirect, I will remove the tag, as it is disruptive. --Diego Grez (talk) 00:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
What is the relevance of Kurt Cobain's death? Yes, I know that the tag says it is a BLP, however, there is no other tag that covers that fact that this is a negative redirect. How is mocking someone's death not negative? - Hoops gza (talk) 01:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- The tag does not apply, then. You should put it up on redirects for discussion, that's the normal procedure for cases like this. I don't think the redirect itself is mocking Cobain's death (though some people do use it to mock it), someone (Spanish speakers, most likely) may actually search for him, as "Kurt Cobain" is precisely pronounced "Curcovein" in Spanish... --Diego Grez (talk) 01:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Yes, it is mocking. Names are pronounced by the language in which the subject's native language is usually. Cobain spoke English and Cobain is an English-language name. And this is the English Wikipedia. Furthermore, the admin who deleted this the first time around noted "R3: Recently created, implausible redirect: -- unused in English; G10: Negative unsourced BLP". - Hoops gza (talk) 01:29, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- It was not recently created, it was not implausible, it was not unused in English, and it was not a "biography of a living person", it was a redirect!!! You should have, at least, taken it up at WP:RFD. Diego Grez (talk) 03:11, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
BNA access
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Chris Troutman (talk) 16:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 02:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Nikkimaria (talk) 02:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! HighBeam is gonna be really useful! --Diego Grez (talk) 02:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Mistake?
Hey Diego, I assume this was a mistake? --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Block
I'm not sure why you're reverting good edits from experienced editors in good standing, I'm concerned this account is compromised. I've initially blocked this account for 24 hours until you explain your behaviour, thanks. Nick (talk) 23:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Additionally, I've removed your advanced permissions - after this issue is cleared up ping my talk page for reinstatement. — xaosflux Talk 00:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hey guys, I am sorry for the trouble caused, I left my computer turned on, someone left things over its keyboard and it seems to have gone mad. Once again, I am sorry for the trouble this caused, it was accidental, and it's not going to happen again. (Please unblock me, by the way, Nick!) Diego Grez (talk) 01:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Resolved. --AmaryllisGardener talk 01:24, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Restored. — xaosflux Talk 01:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you guys --Diego Grez (talk) 01:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- That explains the weird revert notification I got for an edit at WP:BOWN. Morale of the story: Always lock your computer when AFK! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 02:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't explain anything, how leaving "things over its keyboard" has managed to selectively revert a number of edits. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- How I think things happened: some stuff was left over the keyboard of my notebook, selecting the "dTa! OneClick" option of a plugin named DownThemAll!, as I left my computer turned on, with my watchlist on it. It managed to download all of the links of the Watchlist, including those that rollbacked edits. --Diego Grez (talk) 21:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- And come to that, it doesn't explain how "things over its keyboard" could mark all these edits as minor. The 'things' seem to have selected the material to revert, ticked the 'minor edit' box, and then clicked on the 'save' box. Repeatedly... AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- @AndyTheGrump: Diego could have had his prefs set to mark all edits as minor, though unlikely. --AmaryllisGardener talk 02:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- @AndyTheGrump: @AmaryllisGardener: All rollbacks are automatically marked as a minor edit. - NQ (talk) 02:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- As far as I can see from the documentation, DownThemAll! does exactly what its name suggests. [7] It mass downloads material to the computer it is running on. It doesn't appear to have a facility making mass reverts on Wikipedia - something that to be automated would presumably require a bot which communicated via the MediaWiki API. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Try making it download all links on your watchlist, then come back and tell us what happened. Regards, --Diego Grez (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- @AndyTheGrump: Diego could have had his prefs set to mark all edits as minor, though unlikely. --AmaryllisGardener talk 02:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- And come to that, it doesn't explain how "things over its keyboard" could mark all these edits as minor. The 'things' seem to have selected the material to revert, ticked the 'minor edit' box, and then clicked on the 'save' box. Repeatedly... AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- How I think things happened: some stuff was left over the keyboard of my notebook, selecting the "dTa! OneClick" option of a plugin named DownThemAll!, as I left my computer turned on, with my watchlist on it. It managed to download all of the links of the Watchlist, including those that rollbacked edits. --Diego Grez (talk) 21:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't explain anything, how leaving "things over its keyboard" has managed to selectively revert a number of edits. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- That explains the weird revert notification I got for an edit at WP:BOWN. Morale of the story: Always lock your computer when AFK! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 02:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you guys --Diego Grez (talk) 01:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Restored. — xaosflux Talk 01:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article El Marino you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sfs90 -- Sfs90 (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
I reviewed this. I struck it out from the DYK list, as it is not in need of a reviewer. Your edit to the contrary is wrong. Perhaps we have had a failure to communicate. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- See the block notice above, and Diego Grez's recent edit history - the edit was one of a long series of unexplained reverts from this account. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
The article El Marino you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:El Marino for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sfs90 -- Sfs90 (talk) 23:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Rebeca Cofré
On 1 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rebeca Cofré, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 2013, mayor of Chépica Rebeca Cofré was named one of the 100 Leading Women of Chile by El Mercurio newspaper? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rebeca Cofré. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arauco Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Jacob Soto Araya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails Wikipedia:Notability (sports) guidelines
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Andy, I was about to leave you a message on your talk page, but you came first. I wonder why did you remove the mention to Soto Araya from the school's article, with the surfer's article being well-referenced with sources such as La Segunda. Anyway, it kinda brings me down to have the content removed... Certainly your 'notability' parameters are higher than those I believe. Regards, Küñall (talk) 23:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Conflict of interest, part 2
As you should probably be aware, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines include "contributing to Wikipedia to promote your own interests, including... your external relationships, such as with family, friends or employers". Since you went to school with entirely non-notable "local surfer" Jacob Soto Araya, I think it is safe to assume that if you aren't promoting him by creating an entirely inappropriate article to promote your former school, you are doing so because he is a friend of yours. Either way, I suggest you accept the proposed deletion I've just made, and find something useful to do on Wikipedia, rather than once again misusing it for your own purposes. Otherwise, I will raise the matter at WP:ANI and ask that you be topic banned from any edits relating to the school, the commune of Pichilemu and any other locality or educational institution you have any connection with. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe you are misunderstanding things, Andy. Let me clarify: I have not had any contact with him since we left school. I knew he had some sort of surfing career, there were some sources and started the article, that's it. I am not contesting the article's deletion (I would have done it immediately after you proposed it, but I didn't), and, seemingly I will refrain from editing the school's article, because you see everything I do as a conflict of interest, where there is. You will not believe me anyway, I don't blame you, but I will take the easiest path. (By the way, threats are not necessary, discussion is better, isn't it?) Küñall (talk) 23:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Re: Rollbacking
I've left a message on Talk:1985 Rapel Lake earthquake about WP:COMMONNAME. --Sfs90 (talk) 04:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2010 Pichilemu earthquake, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Osorno, Calama and La Serena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Chile
I only reverted your edit because rolling back to a previous version was easier than manually editing. I intended to reinstate your addition, but you did it before me, so, apologies. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- No worries, regards Küñall (talk) 21:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just trying to get the ball rolling. If you are confident and you have this thing, then its all yours. Stay safe man. Thank you. 77.101.41.108 (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
When making a translation...
Thanks for translating 2014 Valparaíso wildfire from the Spanish article. When you do something like this, you need to document the translation for copyright reasons. I have done so for you this time, but wanted to let you know for future reference. See Template:Translated page for instructions. Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there. I was aware that I had to do it, but I eventually forgot. Thank you buddy. Regards, Küñall (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)