User talk:VALLEYMAN25

Hello, VALLEYMAN25, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 01:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

‎Betrayal (2012 novel)

Hi. I have removed a significant chunk of text from ‎Betrayal (2012 novel) because it was copied straight from the novel's website. Wikipedia is free content and cannot accept copyrighted text. Best, Pichpich (talk) 01:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I've reverted your re-insertion of the text which probably occurred while I was writing the message above. For further explanations of the issue, Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing is a good read. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I've also removed the synopsis from Friends Forever (2012 novel) for the same reasons.

Look, I'm serious about this. You cannot reinsert this synopsis and this is non-negotiable. Introducing copyrighted content on Wikipedia will get you blocked from editing. If you have any questions, I'll be happy to help but you have to stop fighting over this. Pichpich (talk) 01:50, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 01:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdinand Marcos

The material you added to Ferdinand Marcos was not associated with the article so I removed it. Please stay on topic. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 02:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

corrupt people

WP:SPA might be thought of our edits trying to identify people who amassed large mounts illegally, but this is an online encyclopedia - not a blog (or other web mirror of wikipedia) - in which case WP:UNDUE and a few other policies are worth considering - also WP:RS is well worth a good read.. Satu Suro 02:57, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Suharto. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:02, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

I hate to do it but you don't seem to understand the seriousness of the situation. You cannot build Wikipedia articles by violating other people's copyrights. I warned you yesterday but you returned today and copy-pasted chunks of text stolen from other websites to Love, Lies and Murder, Friends Forever (2012 novel) and Betrayal (2012 novel). This is completely unacceptable and you will be blocked from editing without further warning if this happens again. Pichpich (talk) 16:50, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I've also reverted your changes to Alvin Patrimonio and Jun Limpot which also violate other webistes' copyrights. Please do not reinsert this material as is and make you understand Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing before expanding those articles. Pichpich (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ariel "Aga" Aquino Muhlach.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ariel "Aga" Aquino Muhlach.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 06:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The Photo Of Rommel Adducul.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Photo Of Rommel Adducul.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 06:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The Photo of Zandro "Jun" Limpot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Photo of Zandro "Jun" Limpot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 06:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Danielle Steel's Betrayal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Danielle Steel's Betrayal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Aga Muhlach.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aga Muhlach.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 15:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Rommel Adducul Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rommel Adducul Photo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 15:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Zandro Jun Limpot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zandro Jun Limpot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 15:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images of living people

Hi. I just wanted to clarify why the images above were deleted. Non-free images of living people almost always fail to meet condition 1 of the non-free content criteria. Indeed, because these people are alive it is entirely possible to create a free image of that person. Pichpich (talk) 16:28, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:La Salle Green Archer Jun Limpot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:La Salle Green Archer Jun Limpot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User VALLEYMAN25 aka FORESTMAN38. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

VALLEYMAN25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

67.188.26.179 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "FORESTMAN38". The reason given for FORESTMAN38's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: obvious sock created to avoid scrutiny (copy

Blocking administrator: Drmies (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: One at a time please, see below Jac16888 ^Talk 21:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VALLEYMAN25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know any account named FORESTMAN38

Decline reason:

What Pich said, we're not idiots Jac16888 ^Talk 21:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh come on... Don't assume we're idiots. FORESTMAN38 is an account with the same type of username, using the same IP, created just after I warned that you'd be blocked, editing the same subjects, often the same articles and in the case of Betrayal (2012 novel) and Friends Forever (2012 novel) making the same edits. On top of that FORESTMAN38 stopped editing just as you resumed to edit. Pichpich (talk) 21:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The photo of Limpot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The photo of Limpot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 02:14, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The photo of Aga Muhlach.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The photo of Aga Muhlach.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 02:15, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The image of Rommel Adducul.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The image of Rommel Adducul.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 02:15, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images of living people again

Hi. Let me repeat what I said earlier about these warnings you are getting about images. Non-free images of living people almost always fail to meet condition 1 of the non-free content criteria. Indeed, because these people are alive it is entirely possible to create a free image of that person. Please stop uploading such images since they will be inevitably deleted and only serve to waste other people's time. Thank you, Pichpich (talk) 02:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 02:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Danielle Steel's Betrayal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Danielle Steel's Betrayal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of characters

Hi. I invite you to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. Note in particular that plot summaries and related elements such as lists of characters should be commensurate to the rest of the article. In the case of articles for Danielle Steel novels, there's little content except the introductory sentence and accordingly there's no need for super detailed plots and lists of characters. Pichpich (talk) 15:01, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Betrayal (2012 novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betrayal (2012 novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betrayal (2012 novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Front Cover Of Danielle Steel's Miracle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Front Cover Of Danielle Steel's Miracle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]