User talk:User 7373830

NO VISA VISA VISA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:1378:EAC0:0:68:7F8:B401 (talk) 07:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome	to	Wikipedia!
User 7373830!

I've noticed some of your contributions and I want to say hello!
Have a look at the links below if you want to learn more about editing Wikipedia:
Introduction	Navigating Wikipedia	Editing Wikipedia articles
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia	Writing your very first article	HELP ME!
Here are some of the basic Wikipedia policies that you should be aware of:
Be BOLD!	Assume good faith	Be civil and polite
Don't infringe copyright	Vandals aren't nice	Don't get blocked
If you need any more help, visit the Teahouse for friendly help from other editors, or go on the Wikipedia Adventure for a fun and interactive way of learning about Wikipedia.
And if you still have unanswered questions, click this link to ask a question, and someone will come to help you soon.

Cyclone Toby 23:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changing information and/or statistics or removing content without providing a verifiable reliable source

Hello, I'm Netherzone. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Baloch people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not change statistical information without providing a current, verifiable reliable source (reference). For information on what a reliable source is, see WP:RS Thank you.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sindhis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pashtun diaspora, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop changing statistical information in articles just because you might not agree with it. You must provide verifiable reliable sources for any such changes, and correctly reference them as a citation. If you do not know how to do that please ask at the WP:Tea House or WP:Help Desk, and someone can guide you. There are also tutorials available on how to correctly edit and contribute to the encyclopedia. Please do not do this again, or you may lose your editing priviledges. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your help at the article "List of country subdivisions by population" is appreciated, but reliable sources are of the utmost importance.

I noticed you added some useful information about Konkan Division to the article, but since you didn't cite the source correctly, it was removed soon afterwards. I have since added it back into the table (formatted and sourced properly this time). Remember if you want to make edits on Wikipedia, you have to rely on sources. -- Abbasi786786 (talk) 00:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing statistics in articles without adding a citation/reference

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Saraiki people. Please stop changing statistics in articles without citing a source or reference for the change. Or discuss on the talk page of the articles. Please take the tutorial on how to edit wikipedia, and learn about correct refering of reliable sources. This is your fourth warning, please respond or change your editing behavior or get help from the WP:Teahouse or WP:Help desk or you can also reach out to me if you have questions. However you must stop changing statistics. Netherzone (talk) 00:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:08, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of religious populations, you may be blocked from editing. NebY (talk) 15:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of religious populations. Please stop changing statistics without providing a verifiable citation to a reliable source and an edit summary. Netherzone (talk) 16:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You have continued to add unsourced statistical information and now pie charts with your own statistics that are not backed up by reliable sources, nor edit summaries. Today these articles were affected by these changes: Islam in Uganda, Islam in Cameroon, Islam in Nigeria, Islam in Niger, Islam in Tanzania, Islam in Senegal, Islam in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Islam in Chad.You have received multiple warnings about this. These changes will be reverted. Please stop this disruptive editing, and provide references in reliable sources to reflect the statistical accuracies of these edits. Netherzone (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC) I understand that you probably intend to be helpful, and the pie charts are nicely crafted, but this is an encyclopedia, and such changes need to referenced to a reliable source. If nothing else put the source in an edit summary, otherwise you run the risk of being blocked again. Netherzone (talk) 15:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JayBeeEll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Religion in the Middle East, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JBL (talk) 01:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ahmadiyya by country, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop adding unsourced statistics to articles. Netherzone (talk) 01:55, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding unsourced content, or removing sourced content on articles regarding population and religion statistics Netherzone (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fourth-degree relative

Hello, User 7373830

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JayBeeEll, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Fourth-degree relative, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JayBeeEll}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JBL (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m ok User 7373830 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2nd block for unsourced edits

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tajiks. The CIA source doesn't cover the material you've added vis. Uzbekistan. I noticed you have been warned and blocked on numerous occassions for making disruptive edits. This won't look good at ANI. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Demographics of Eritrea

added links pointing to Tigre, Kunama, Bilen and Saho

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Amhara people. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Oromo people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Netherzone (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding false statistics

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add false material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021–22 CAF Champions League knockout stage. Please stop adding unbelievable statistics. Or discuss on the talk page of the articles. Please take the tutorial on how to edit wikipedia, and learn about correct refering of reliable sources. This is your fourth warning, please respond or change your editing behavior or get help from the WP:Teahouse or WP:Help desk or you can also reach out to me if you have questions. However you must stop changing statistics. Cr7fromTUN (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Punjab, Pakistan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Manti core 00:57, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. — Manti core 00:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sindh. — Manti core 01:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Religion in Pakistan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop changing statistics in articles and adding unsourced or poorly sourced content (blogs are not reliable sources). You have been warned many times by numerous editors. You need to stop and learn the correct way to edit Wikipedia. Netherzone (talk) 01:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again you changed statistics using a poor quality source. The content that you re-added to Religion in Pakistan is "sourced" to a blog (per your edit summary). Please read through all the warnings you have received from multiple editors, these indicate that you are doing something incorrect that compromises the reliability of the encyclopedia. Netherzone (talk) 02:04, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptively ignoring community concerns about verifiability and the reliability of sources voiced here on this page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]