User talk:Uritol

September 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 10:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but i had to remove indian propaganda and fake terms. Uritol (talk) 10:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Indian martial arts, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 10:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Silambam, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why did you remove all the contributions i have made across several websites? Uritol (talk) 05:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the reasons given here on your talk page - you were and are violating the original research policy. You have also been deleting properly sourced content for no apparent reason. Neither is allowed on Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello, may I request that my IP Address be unblocked from editing Wikipedia? I don't know why but my IP address suddenly got blocked from editing, but they say that another account is using my IP address to Vandalise wikipedia, but it isn't me. Uritol (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your IP addresses are getting blocked because you are using them to attempt to evade the block on your account. MrOllie (talk) 15:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i'm uritol's brother here using the same IP address to contribute to another wikipage, called ''Shuai Jiao''. I hope you can continue blocking this account but can you remove the block on my IP addresses? My brother insists on Vandalising another wikipage, so you can continue blocking this account, but can you please unblock my IP address as I would like to make positive contributions to other wikipages, unlike my brother. Thus, I think it's unfair, that I have to suffer under my brother's mistakes and consequences. Uritol (talk) 09:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, we've never heard that one before: WP:LITTLEBROTHER MrOllie (talk) 13:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

haha...very funny...

Look, what I did to Wikipedia was previously wrong, because I had no knowledge of citations, so I just deleted chunks of properly sourced information, which is Vandalism.

If you unblock me, I promise to make Wikipedia a better place by now citing my information with reliable sources, as I learnt from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5Yv9GhoH_w.

If I continue to Vandalize Wikipedia in any form you consider, you therefore have the right to permanently block me.

I hope you'll give me a final chance to set things right for Wikipedia and myself. Uritol (talk) 14:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Origins of Asian martial arts, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 05:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry, but can you explain to me how this text makes any sense?

''Indian martial arts may have spread to China via the transmission of Buddhism in the early 5th or 6th centuries of the common era and thus influenced Shaolin Kungfu. Elements from Indian philosophy, like the Nāga, Rakshasa, and the fierce Yaksha were syncretized into protectors of Dharma; these mythical figures from the Dharmic religions figure prominently in Shaolinquan, Chang quan and staff fighting.^[1] The religious figures from Dharmic religions also figure in the movement and fighting techniques of Chinese martial arts.^[2] Various styles of kung fu are known to contain movements that are identical to the Mudra hand positions used in Hinduism and Buddhism, both of which derived from India.^[3] Similarly, the 108 pressure points in Chinese martial arts are believed by some to be based on the marmam points of Indian varmakalai.^[4]^[5]

The predominant telling of the diffusion of the martial arts from India to China involves a 5th-century prince turned into a monk named Bodhidharma who is said to have traveled to Shaolin, sharing his own style and thus creating Shaolinquan.^[6] According to Wong Kiew Kit, the Monk's creation of Shaolin arts "...marked a watershed in the history of kungfu, because it led to a change of course, as kungfu became institutionalized. Before this, martial arts were known only in general sense."^[7]''

I'm pretty sure you can agree with me that this source is a form of propaganda, im trying to make some sense out of this. Uritol (talk) 05:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Origins of Asian martial arts. ... discospinster _talk 06:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fuck you. you're promoting hate and propaganda. Uritol (talk) 06:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Origins_of_Asian_martial_arts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Uritol. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jiao Di

Hello, Uritol. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jiao Di, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Wells, Marnix, and Naizhou Chang. Scholar Boxer: Chang Naizhou's Theory of Internal Martial Arts and the Evolution of Taijiquan. Berkeley, Calif: North Atlantic Books, 2004, p. 23
^ Wells, Scholar Boxer, p. 200
^ Johnson, Nathan J. Barefoot Zen: The Shaolin Roots of Kung Fu and Karate. York Beach, Me: S. Weiser, 2000, p. 48
^ Subramaniam Phd., P., (general editors) Dr. Shu Hikosaka, Asst. Prof. Norinaga Shimizu, & Dr. G. John Samuel, (translator) Dr. M. Radhika (1994). Varma Cuttiram வர்ம சுத்திரம்: A Tamil Text on Martial Art from Palm-Leaf Manuscript. Madras: Institute of Asian Studies. pp. 90 & 91. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Reid Phd., Howard, Michael Croucher (1991). The Way of the Warrior: The Paradox of the Martial Arts. New York: Outlook Press. pp. 58–85. ISBN 0879514337.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Cephas, Shawn (Winter 1994). "The Root of Warrior Priests in the Martial Arts". Kung Fu Magazine.
^ Wong, Kiew Kit. The Art of Shaolin Kung Fu: The Secrets of Kung Fu for Self-Defense Health and Enlightenment. Tuttle martial arts. Boston, Mass: Tuttle, 2002, p. 13

[1] Wells, Marnix, and Naizhou Chang. Scholar Boxer: Chang Naizhou's Theory of Internal Martial Arts and the Evolution of Taijiquan. Berkeley, Calif: North Atlantic Books, 2004, p. 23

[2] Wells, Scholar Boxer, p. 200

[3] Johnson, Nathan J. Barefoot Zen: The Shaolin Roots of Kung Fu and Karate. York Beach, Me: S. Weiser, 2000, p. 48

[4] Subramaniam Phd., P., (general editors) Dr. Shu Hikosaka, Asst. Prof. Norinaga Shimizu, & Dr. G. John Samuel, (translator) Dr. M. Radhika (1994). Varma Cuttiram வர்ம சுத்திரம்: A Tamil Text on Martial Art from Palm-Leaf Manuscript. Madras: Institute of Asian Studies. pp. 90 & 91. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[5] Reid Phd., Howard, Michael Croucher (1991). The Way of the Warrior: The Paradox of the Martial Arts. New York: Outlook Press. pp. 58–85. ISBN 0879514337.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[6] Cephas, Shawn (Winter 1994). "The Root of Warrior Priests in the Martial Arts". Kung Fu Magazine.

[7] Wong, Kiew Kit. The Art of Shaolin Kung Fu: The Secrets of Kung Fu for Self-Defense Health and Enlightenment. Tuttle martial arts. Boston, Mass: Tuttle, 2002, p. 13

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]