User talk:Urchincrawler

Urchincrawler, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Urchincrawler! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hi Urchincrawler, I'm Sundayclose. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles such as Obsessive–compulsive disorder without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Sundayclose (talk) 00:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Sundayclose (talk) 00:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! My sources included OCD UK, a national UK charity for those with OCD, and the International OCD Foundation. The page WP:MEDRS includes "position statements from national or international expert bodies" as reliable sources. Both of these bodies are expert bodies, so what is the issue? I will edit my work to substiate my info with info from other expert bodies like the CDC and NHS, but I think what I had before should have been fine.

Thanks, Urchin Crawler

A charity isn't necessarily (and usually isn't) an "expert body". The expertise should pertain to the field of medicine. The Muscular Dystrophy Association as a group does not have expertise in the medical aspects of muscular dystrophy. Please don't use such sources. They will be removed, per WP:MEDRS. An example of an expert body for muscular dystrophy would be American Academy of Neurology. Similarly, https://www.ocduk.org/ is not an expert body. The American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association would be examples of expert bodies for OCD. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 02:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! Thanks for clarifying. I added the NHS, CDC, and American Psychiatric Association to back up my facts :)

Carriage

If you would like to begin a discussion about your inclusion of bullock carts as carriages would you please do it on the Carriage talk page. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 08:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Gay

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gay, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intersex healthcare has been accepted

Intersex healthcare, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 04:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Urchincrawler well done! High quality article and more broad than the existing Intersex medical interventions ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 15:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]