User talk:UnkreativeFrog/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:UnkreativeFrog. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Hello, UnkreativeFrog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 04:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello UnkreativeFrog! Your additions to Ark: The Animated Series have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Copying/moving content within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Batman supporting characters into List of Batman family enemies. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

The Road Goes Ever On (song)

Hi, thanks for adding details to this article. However, some of the material in the "Film, radio, and musical theatre" section is currently uncited: it'd be much appreciated if you could indicate where the facts came from. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Audience reviews

Per WP:USERG, Wikipedia doesn't catalog what individual audience members think. Audience reaction can be summarized by reliable sources that do professional polling, such as PostTrak. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Charlotte Kirk. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Blue Is the Warmest Colour, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Godzilla, King of the Monsters!, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please refrain from making non-constructive edits. WP:QUO is not in place, so take any issues you have to the talk page. Armegon (talk) 21:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Godzilla (1954 film) to Godzilla, King of the Monsters!. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 21:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palpatine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galactic Empire. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (3rd request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Millennium (novel series) to Dragon Tattoo Stories (film series). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Repeated violations of Wikipedia's attribution requirements may result in the loss of editing privileges. DanCherek (talk) 15:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Omen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zoombinis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TERC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Tales of the Jedi (TV series). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lists of Star Wars cast members shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Brojam (talk) 06:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Star Wars: The Old Republic. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 07:42, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi @UnkreativeFrog. You have been warned before about not randomly removing templates from articles, but did this in your recent edit on Polygamy. Please use more caution when editing pages and not removing relevant material and templates. Raladic (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Tales of the Jedi. As well as Tales of the Jedi (comics) Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring

Hi UnkreativeFrog! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Lists of Star Wars actors several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Lists of Star Wars actors, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, UnkreativeFrog,

You are on the verge of getting a block. Decisions about content aren't decided on Wikipedia by what an individual wants but by consensus. If your edit is reverted, discuss it on the article talk page, don't keep reverting back.

If you have questions, bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

As a heads up, this users did the SAME thing to some pages I've been editing, moving pages without consensus, and proposing deletions without discussion. Historyday01 (talk) 16:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Recent edits

Hello, UnkreativeFrog,

You continue to do bold page moves without entering into any discussion with other editors. If this persists, I will have to issue a block. This is considered disruptive editing. This is not what you think a page title should be but what sources and the consensus of your editors think is appropriate. Please slow down, stop and discuss these changes with your fellow editors. I'd rather not block you but I will if this continues. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:20, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Sorry but you’re seriously overreacting. Maybe look at my changes and use a bit of common sense before threatening me. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 06:38, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

I endorse what Liz is saying. You need to slow down immediately or you're going to be blocked for disruptive editing. This is a common issue - it takes time to learn how Wikipedia works. But you can't just go out guns a blazing like this while others clean up your messes. Sergecross73 msg me 16:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

I have to agree with that. The positive out of all of this is that I proposed some page mergers, but doing bold page moves without entering discussion isn't right. Having a discussion is also an opportunity for users to propose other page names and come to consensus, and is important, without a doubt. It definitely takes time to learn how Wikipedia works, as I've been editing on here consistently since 2019, and still and learning more all the time. Even so, it is wrong to go guns a blazing and have others clean up messes. Historyday01 (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

As I said Animated series with LGBT characters: 2010s, Animated series with LGBT characters: 2000s, or Animated series with LGBT characters: 1990s, Animated series with LGBT characters: 2020s dont need to be merged because all their informations are already available in other articles. Its not like I PROPOSED the deletion randomly. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

I did not mean to offend you're or someone elses work. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

I wouldn't say the changes offend me or the work of others, but believe they could have been done a better way. I once thought you do, and believed I could make bold changes like that on my own, and it led to some heated arguments on various WikiProjects. So, I'd say the changes were made with good intentions, but a merger allows for more discussion, as proposed deletion puts pages on the chopping block. Personally, I'm a bigger believer in solving issues before deletion has been proposed. I've participated in many deletion discussions over the years, and from my experience, often those proposing deletion do so as a shortcut, rather than trying to discuss their changes with other users first. Deletion should never be a substitute for what can be solved through editing.

I admit that those pages are not the best and were only created (by me) some time ago to serve as a place to link to the lists of LGBTQ animated characters (with the List of animated series with LGBT characters in bad shape before I did some revisions years ago). While saying all of that, I would rather have discussion about possible mergers than deleting them outright. I've been thinking a LOT recently about restructuring those pages and others about LGBTQ animation, but I can only do so much on my own. As such it is a pretty slow process, but I'd like to involve as MANY people on here as possible in it. Furthermore, there is no rush to improve or create articles. Historyday01 (talk) 17:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, but a merger is much better than proposing a deletion. As I've said before, deletion is no substitute for what can be solved through editing. I proposed the mergers and hope that some good can come from there. Historyday01 (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Where am I editing disruptively? Sorry but Maybe just look at my changes and use a bit of nuance before accusing smb. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Honestly, if I wasn't somewhat involved with your edits, you would be blocked right now. I would strongly suggest you stop editing a bit and learn more about working with other users rather than being a bull in a china shop. You've got numerous editors on here all telling you the same thing, yet you are not listening. If you continue to keep doing what you're doing, you're going to get blocked by another admin. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Can I PLEASE get a fucking answer what about the changes is really disruptive. The edit on Ahsoka (TV series) just adds a missing premise, supported by reliable sources, the edits on the LGBT animated series are also reasonable and explained. Again just look at my changes and use a bit of nuance and common sense and stop threatening me. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 12:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm honestly starting to think your just trolling. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 12:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Disappointing, yet not surprising response. Good luck with your future editing. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Ellis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

UnkreativeFrog (talk) 15:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

merger discussions

Hi! Just a note that when you post a merge template, such as at Special:Diff/1144192913, you are supposed to also create the discussion for this with your rationale (at Talk:List of Star Wars characters. Did you want to continue with this? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Parker (disambiguation). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I'm leaving you this warning since I noticed you've attempted to revert back to your revision of that page multiple times this year, and each time, editors have provided you the information why your revision goes against policies, but your insistence to keep restoring your revision anyways is what is disruptive. Steel1943 (talk) 01:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

You know what? You deserve a barnstar. Your recent productive edits on Peter Parker (disambiguation) after restoring the problematic revision represent probably the first time in my 10+ years editing Wikipedia where I've seen an editor take a warning message seriously, learn from it, and address the issues stated in the warning message and adapt their edits ... as you did on Peter Parker (disambiguation). I'm impressed, and ... quite happy you did that! Thank you so much! Steel1943 (talk) 23:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Page moves

Hello, UnkreativeFrog,

Please be more careful with your page moves. Several have been reverted or changed to redirects. There is also no reason to do multiple page moves of the same page. You have to have a very good reason to move an article and often you should have a discussion on the article talk page to discuss a move prior to doing it. When other editors are reverting your page moves, there is a problem here. Please handle this more thoughtfully and do not do a page move based on your personal preference or on an impulse. You should always be following policy guidelines. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

I seriously try to do page moves only when necessary. Most of my page moves are made because missing disambiguators with can easily lead to confusion. The multiple moves of the same page were because of a typo in the title.UnkreativeFrog (talk) 03:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

But if I seriously did/do a wrong redirect people can write that here.UnkreativeFrog (talk) 04:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Btw am I on a list of editors assigned to you or why/how do we interact so often? Thank you for an answer in advance.UnkreativeFrog (talk) 04:08, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Heartbrand logo 1998-2003.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heartbrand logo 1998-2003.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Heartbrand logo prior to 1998.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heartbrand logo prior to 1998.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Concentration camp Unter den Eichen

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Concentration camp Unter den Eichen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of IGDB for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IGDB is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IGDB until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgelRM (talk) 01:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

For the record, I intended to withdraw my nomination but got sick IRL. Apologies if I caused you stress. I might look into a merger talk page discussion when I get to it. Regards IgelRM (talk) 11:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Lego Harry Potter minifigures

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Lego Harry Potter minifigures, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Lego Star Wars sets

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Lego Star Wars sets, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Lego Harry Potter minifigures

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Lego Harry Potter minifigures".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Lego Star Wars sets

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Lego Star Wars sets".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Lego minifigures

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Lego minifigures".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Epic Games Store exclusive video games

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Epic Games Store exclusive video games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Lego Super Heroes minifigures

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Lego Super Heroes minifigures".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 05:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Lego Star Wars minifigures

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Lego Star Wars minifigures, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Star Wars: Darth Vader (Marvel Comic series)

Hello, UnkreativeFrog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Star Wars: Darth Vader (Marvel Comic series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)