User talk:Undergroundresident

February 2024

Hello, I'm PenguinEncounter2. I noticed that you recently removed content from Notis Botsaris without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

I was also wondering if you were affiliated with the site mlahanas.de, because you are replacing links to Souliote with links to it. Thanks!

penguinencounter2@enwiki:~/talk/contrib$ 02:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the content with the faulse information.You are welcome 🙏 buddy. Undergroundresident (talk) 04:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Notis Botsaris, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Photini Tzavela. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The link is written by professionals and i think it is very important to be added.Your articles are not relevant to the subject ,please try harder. Undergroundresident (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kitsos Botsaris. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to Kitsos Tzavelas. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert faulse informations as you did with this edit to Kitsos Tzavelas. Persistent failures may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Undergroundresident (talk) 04:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 06:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Undergroundresident (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here The link provides useful informations and it is not a spam or an advertisment.Since wikipedia gives me the right to use an external link,i did so.It is not against Wikipedia's policies since i'm not involved in this page.

Decline reason:

There is no way I am unblocking you, so you can continue adding your link. You do not have a right to add the link, and I disagree about whether adding the link is within policy and guidelines. PhilKnight (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Undergroundresident (talk) 13:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Undergroundresident (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Undergroundresident". The reason given for Undergroundresident's block is: "Spam / advertising-only account".

Blocking administrator: ‪Izno‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Not autoblocked; you are blocked directly for spamming. Yamla (talk) 11:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]