User talk:Ultimâ

Welcome

Hello, Ultimâ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Crusio (talk) 20:21, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Neuroscience

Let me also welcome you to Wikipedia. However, please do not keep re-adding the material to the page. Please read WP:COI and WP:OR. Thank you. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Cyber-physical system. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. LiberatorG (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LiberatorG, it is the other way around. I added content, have updated it several times based on the talk page and each time it was removed by the other user (who has a history of edit warring). Ultimâ (talk) 09:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. CptViraj (📧) 09:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies CptViraj. I did not realise content was being removed, as the revert didn't comment why it occurred. Ultimâ (talk) 09:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Embedded system shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 15:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Apparition11, the war is being made upon me. Wiki policy advises against reverting because this discourages contribution and suggests being guilty until proven innocent. My contributions have had numerous revisions based on feedback over the last couple months from the talk page and with references that the reverters are not taking into account.

Edit warring is never the right thing to do. Wikipedia does not advise against reverting, it encourages the bold, revert, discuss cycle. You were bold, others reverted, now it is time to discuss, not continue reverting. You do not have consensus on the talk page. You are the only one to break 3RR, and you will almost definitely be blocked if you continue reverting. Guilty until proven innocent is not really a thing on Wikipedia, but the history clearly proves that you are guilty of edit warring and breaking 3RR. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 16:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Apparition11, the 3RR is to provide a degree of protection to the contributers. If I get blocked, this is killing the contributor who has acted in good faith, revised their input based on feedback and provided professional sources explaining the changes. MrOllie is practicing WP:Disruptive Editing, the talk page shows this. The history has already been reported on the Edit Warring page.

3RR is there to prevent edit warring. No he is not disruptive editing. He is editing in good faith. The only breach of policy is the edit warring, which, again, you are the only person to break 3RR. The talk page does not show that, it only shows that you do not have consensus. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 16:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I looked into the edit warring report that you mentioned. The result was no violation for Mr. Ollie but you were told "Repeating an edit to force preferred text is edit warring. Please use WP:DR." and "Perhaps it would be better to look at why your change is being described as "not an improvement" (it's also unsourced, by the way)." That report does not support your claims at all. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 19:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ultimâ reported by User:Apparition11 (Result: ). Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 23:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Embedded system. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:21, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]