User talk:UikiHedeo

Could you publish my an article about my YT channel? Please as a friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aftotalantos (talk • contribs) 04:12, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mamoru Shinozaki

I'm done editing, but someone else should double check. Firezzasd (talk) 01:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! The quality of the article improved greatly, I guess. And please forgive me borrowing your message to ask someone else to "double check" on Wikipedia:Cleanup page.--UikiHedeo (talk) 12:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sook Ching

Hi there, I removed the badly written and one-sided "A Japanese humanist" section (which, independent of ones opinion on Shinozaki, is not needed as a whole paragraph in this article) and added some sentences about him in "Aftermath". I tried covering the different views on him in short, for the rest people can click on his name. Would be cool if you could have an eye on the article and that my edit is not reverted (and if it his, contact a mediator on here), I am not on wiki often and do not have an account here. All the best! 91.65.209.65 (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kindness. I think links to the article "Mamoru Shinozaki" help readers be aware of his natural shape. Who reverted my edition may revert your edition again - I know he did such edition in ja-wiki many times. So I may contact to "mediator" in such situation. Any way, I think the article "Sook Ching" still needs WP:BB for whole sentences, and I also need anybody help to check the English grammar of the article "Mamoru Shinozaki" and remove "Clean up" template. Thank you. --UikiHedeo (talk) 02:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AnotherReflist

Template:AnotherReflist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uncivil conduct

Personal attacks and ungrounded accusations of vandalism like you did in your recent [1] edit summary are not typically how things are done on Wikipedia. See WP:CIVIL and other pages regarding conduct policies when you have time, WP:HERRING would be a good start.

It looks like you were permanently banned from the Japanese version of Wikipedia on your other account User:宇井木辺出夫 mainly due to your poor behavior, obstructive edits and attacks on other users. This would point to this not being a one off thing or something due to inexperience. This indicates to me that you still haven't fully understood the reason for your ban and makes a convincing case for you also being banned from English Wikipedia. Daiichi1 (talk) 14:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Special:Diff/1046101772/1046115251 and stop your disruptive editing according to WP:DE which still not validated in Japanese wikipedia.--UikiHedeo (talk) 02:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FLASH, a Japanese weekly magazine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FLASH, a Japanese weekly magazine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I will add information from outer source. though the sources not so abundun except self-information because the article is about a magazine. UikiHedeo (talk) 14:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reliability of some sentences which refer to the place of editorial office or such basic information is not to be a problem though they are dependent to self-information, isn't it? Notability problem might solved by the information from JMPA. FLASH is an famous magazine in Japan, I think. UikiHedeo (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flash (Japanese magazine) (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Note as well that one of the references is a Wikipedia link, which should be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, UikiHedeo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine). Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 05:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flash (Japanese magazine) (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 04:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine)

Hello, UikiHedeo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Flash (Japanese magazine)

Hello, UikiHedeo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Flash".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NLBS

Template:NLBS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]