User talk:MikeyCommPhD

June 2018

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 16:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MikeyCommPhD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not a business entry - it the same as other published academic entries, such as https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wendy_Hui_Kyong_Chun - how is this a business?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, only one request needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your username (I assume) means "University of East London Commmunications", which would be a department of the University. Your username must indicate you as an individual user; please read the username policy and reformat your existing unblock request to suggest a new username(per the instructions in the block notice). A name in the format of "YourName of UEL Communications" would be acceptable if you wish to indicate your affiliation with the University in your name. You don't have to use your real name, just something unique to you. Regarding your edits themselves, and given the fact that you seem to represent the University, you seem to be promoting your University's staff, which is not permitted. Please review the conflict of interest policy at WP:COI and the paid editing policy at WP:PAID and make the appropriate declarations. Complying with the paid editing policy is required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use if you are a paid editor(or editing as part of your job duties). 331dot (talk) 17:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MikeyCommPhD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Mikey:UELcommunications (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

This entry does not represent UEL - I am drawing attention to published work of an academic who works there. I can remove links to this institution if that helps

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from Wikipedia:Changing username and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. 331dot (talk) 08:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not saying the entry represents UEL, I am saying you represent UEL. If you do not, please clarify. Please don't remove comments until the discussion is over, at least. 331dot (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

neither the entry or I represent UEL in a business/promotional context. It was bad choice of user name - mispelt as well. I'm a PhD student with an interest in media theory, the work of this academic and the other mentioned

Subsequent comments can simply be posted without the unblock request formatting; only unblock request is needed at a time. You state that you do not "represent UEL in a business/promotional context"; are you associated with UEL in any capacity other than being a student?(if you are even a UEL student) 331dot (talk) 19:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry for block formatting. I am a PhD student at UEL. I am paying money to them to study, so not with any vestsed interest in promoting the uni other than my own interest in the work of this academic. We just thought it was important that some of the staff here get more attention for their work. Many are losing their jobs due to cuts.

Non-admin comment "...We just thought it was important..."

Please clarify. "We"? That implies a shared account, which is also not permitted. Can you confirm that you are the sole owner of this account, and that nobody else, including university administrators, has access to it? _{Also, please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes (~).} Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 05:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want "UELCommunications" in your username if you do not represent UEL? 331dot (talk) 08:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

MikeyCommPhD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21692 was submitted on Jun 02, 2018 08:43:30. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Two answers here then... First, "We" is a reference to me and a conversation I had with other PhD students in a pub - nobody else has access to this page. I can see why you're testing me on this, but it's getting a little black mirror. Second, I used the name UELCommuncations (sic) because I am a PhD student doing communications... Again, I can see why there's a problem here, but it was simply a choice I made without foresight of the problems it would cause.UELcommuncations (talk) 08:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving the username issue aside(someone with the power to change usernames should be along at some point), you seem to indicate that you are here for promotional purposes. ("I am drawing attention to published work of an academic who works there", "thought it was important that some of the staff here get more attention for their work. Many are losing their jobs due to cuts.") I have nothing but sympathy for what you are trying to do, but edits here must be made with the goal of improving this encyclopedia. The draft you were working on read more like a social media profile or entry in a university guide than an encyclopedia article. You had at least one link to a place to purchase this academic's work, and from what I saw few if any independent reliable sources with in depth coverage that indicate how this man meets the notability guidelines for academics at WP:NACADEMIC. You may find reading Your First Article helpful. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for this. What are you proposing? I can work on a new draft - just to note that I did refer to a number of external sources though - journals, press, and reviews of the academics work - So I don't entirely agree, although, yes, I didn't mean to link to any sales opportunities. I can find more credible sources, but are you saying that links to university press pages are a no no? Yes you can buy books there, but they are also info sources for reviews etc. Also, when you say "someone with the power to change usernames should be along at some point" you mean that an admin person will change my use name for me? So I can start again? UELcommuncations (talk) 10:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Just to add, I'll be offline now for the remainder of the weekend. It's warm and sunny outside. Have a good weekend UELcommuncations (talk) 10:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not all administrators(such as me) have the ability to change usernames, that is a separate power. I probably would start a fresh draft, only writing based on the content of independent reliable sources. Primary sources are only acceptable for indisputable factual information(like birthdates) and do not establish notability. I suspect that the press of UEL would not qualify as an independent source(if they publish the works of their staff). The sources will have to demonstrate that the academics meet at least one of the criteria written at WP:NACADEMIC. 331dot (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks. Should I just continue with this username for now, or set a new one? I'll start another draft and make sure I follow these guidelines. Thanks again for help with this UELcommuncations (talk) 08:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am unblocking you to allow you to change your username yourself. Please visit WP:CHU and use one of the two methods there to request a new name(one method requires giving an email address, the other does not). I would suggest not editing anything else until your name is changed(merely to avoid confusion). 331dot (talk) 08:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 331dot I've managed to change my username and draft a version that I think follows the guidelines. OK? MikeyCommPhD (talk) 13:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony D Sampson (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeoffreyT2000 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources are mostly about the subject's own works. Independent sources are needed for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tony D Sampson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tony D Sampson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:15, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikeyCommPhD! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:15, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony D. Sampson has been accepted

Tony D. Sampson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks GeoffreyT2000! (MikeyCommPhD (talk) 14:12, 27 September 2018 (UTC))[reply]