User talk:Tuuzi

This is Tuuzi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Rahul M. Jindal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rahul M. Jindal. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've disclosed on my personal user page. I left you a message on your other page seeking your guidance, but I'll leave it here too just in case! I'm very nervous about my first contributions to Wiki. I read this on wikipedia in reference to the disclosure: "They must do this on their main user page, or on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or in edit summaries." It says first I can do it on my main user page so I hope that works! I hope in the future to edit more pages and I might get paid by others and add it there too, unless you say the actual talk page is mandatory? Thank you again.Tuuzi (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul M. Jindal (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahul M. Jindal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rahul M. Jindal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul M. Jindal (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still reads like an advertisement or nomination for some award personal statement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahul M. Jindal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rahul M. Jindal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:12, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tuuzi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:12, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rahul M. Jindal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rahul M. Jindal. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:46, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Tuuzi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Rahul M. Jindal, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help on this page. I understand and fully disclosed this information about being paid. I'm just paid by him, he is not family or friend, but someone I met and worked with in the past who I simply realized there needed to be a wiki page about, so I started one and then he said "hey thanks, I'll compensate you with a gift card." I think I have covered everything in the disclosure statement.Tuuzi (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Tuuzi! You created a thread called Page is denied for seeming like advertisement and referencing issues, requesting a friend to give an example at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Great Immigrants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Great Immigrants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Immigrants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:37, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]