User talk:Turtletennisfogwheat

Welcome!

Hi Turtletennisfogwheat! I noticed your contributions to The Croods and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on The Croods, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Name changes must be sourced. For non-notable people their names are what they are credits say they are. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024: Do not add unsourced genres

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Loser, Baby, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Ss112 15:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Poison (Hazbin Hotel) single cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Poison (Hazbin Hotel) single cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually going to use it for Poison (Hazbin Hotel), however someone replaced it worth a thumbnail with the edit summary of "Per the thread thumbnail is better quality" Turtletennisfogwheat (talk) 22:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 08:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Drake (musician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. That edit is extremely inappropriate. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's the truth Turtletennisfogwheat (talk) 13:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And read wp:blp. Slatersteven (talk) 13:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trump comment

Re: [1]

If editors continue to comment, they disagree. If not, it gets auto-archived after seven days idle. You just delayed auto-archival by three or four days depending on when the bot shows up. Consider removing your comment. ―Mandruss ☎ 10:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very well Turtletennisfogwheat (talk) 10:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]