User talk:Turboman27

Turboman27, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Turboman27! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Sixth Sense plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 20:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Foodfight!. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You cannot say the "film is commonly regarded as one of the worst animated films ever made" and cite a source that does not say that the film is commonly regarded as one of the worst animated films ever made. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Democratic Party (United States). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 19:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Winston Churchill has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a past events. Please only add material about past events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. David J Johnson (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at The Bourne Identity (2002 film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Spider-Man 3.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please review WP:FILMPLOT. DonIago (talk) 18:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to X-Men: Days of Future Past. BigDwiki (talk) 18:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 12:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been warned for this before, but, again, please do not bloat film plot summaries by adding unnecessary detail, as you did at Star Wars (film). Per the hidden notice left at the top of the section, the plot summary should be, at maximum, 700 words. Please review WP:FILMPLOT again. Thank you. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 18:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ivan Drago. - FlightTime Public (open channel) 03:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Sword in the Stone (film). Given your history one would think you'd know better than to go right back to blatantly disregarding WP:FILMPLOT. DonIago (talk) 02:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:35, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Turboman27. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Turboman27. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]