User talk:Tson21
| This user is a student editor in Western_Washington_University/311_History_of_Ancient_Egypt_(Winter_Quarter) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Tson21, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Piesu123 Peer Review
[edit]Nilometer Article
The lead section article adequately reflects the most important information of the article and evenly emphasized the different sections of the article. However, much of the lead as well as most of the article itself seems to have been unchanged aside from the addition of two sentences and two planned pictures, so there is not much to be added to increase the clarity of the lead. Perhaps some fixes in grammar and sentence structure could make the lead a bit less choppy and awkward to read.
The structure of the article is simple and is organized in a simple and readable way.
The article's content seems to be spread evenly across the different points of the topic and does not overemphasize any particular section. It also does not attempt to sway the reader toward any one particular point of view about the topic. The tone and overall content of the article also keeps a neutral stance that does not betray any of the personal feelings of the author.
Unfortunately, in the sandbox draft page there seems to be a complete lack of references to any sources for any of the points made in the article. Due to this, I cannot say whether the statements of the article accurately reflect the sources they were drawn from, whether they are reliable or not, nor if the group of sources used more heavily presented a singular point of view of the topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piesu123 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)