Jump to content

User talk:TshepoR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stacey Fru has been accepted

[edit]
Stacey Fru, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 21:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jackie Phamotse, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanKity (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khayalethu Anthony (November 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TshepoR! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khayalethu Anthony (November 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ratnahastin (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Khayalethu Anthony

[edit]

Information icon Hello, TshepoR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khayalethu Anthony, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page Makoma Mohale has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, how's the draft now? TshepoR (talk) 22:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Makoma Mohale for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makoma Mohale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makoma Mohale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Claggy (talk) 22:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Makoma Mohale, you may be blocked from editing. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Claggy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for personal attacks and disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 03:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bishonen: any objection to increasing to indefinite given this? That's a pretty vile thing to write, in my opinion. Daniel (talk) 08:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I missed that. Agreed. Thanks, Daniel. Bishonen | tålk 08:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia, per this nasty attack.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 08:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Bishonen | tålk 11:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]