Jump to content

User talk:Tserton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Germans

[edit]

Just to share. Since this has nothing to do with improving the article, I post it here: Thanks for starting the discussion at Ethnic groups. Although it has become sour, I think it worth while. This morning, I read your words "making some group of people feel bad ...", then went to class where by coincidence a student with Turkish background told how she had been discriminated against by some teachers in primary school. Students without any migration background who knew those teachers confirmed what she said. That is part of my motivation to persevere and to stay calm. Although I have this motivation, I still want my edits to be neutral and agree with you (once again !) that "Wikipedia should describe the world as it is". --Rsk6400 (talk) 11:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsk6400:Thanks for your kind words, and thanks for the work you do educating young people. I myself grew up as an immigrant in a different culture than my parents', and without dedicated teachers who took the challenges I faced seriously, I would have found it impossible to thrive. I was lucky enough to grow up in an environment where my dual identity was well accepted and I experienced very little "othering". So I was a little dismayed at the anachronistic way many of these topics are addressed on Wikipedia, and it was a big motivation to become more active in the community. But at the same time, I am mindful that we have to base our arguments and decisions in evidence, not simply things I perceive as "common knowledge" - because that's the only way to update outdated articles or wording when there is much resistance against doing so. I still intend to see the discussion through until we come to a final decision. Stay safe in the real world! --Tserton (talk) 11:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, thank you for your new ideas to solve the problem at Germans and for your encouraging words above. Another coincidence: The classroom discussion I mentioned above followed a presentation by a student on Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" in which she mentioned Ugur Sahin as an example of success made possible by people's willingness to accept cultural differences. I saw that you were working on his article and was thinking that racism might have prevented us from getting a vaccine. --Rsk6400 (talk) 10:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just read the latest comments at Talk:Germans. Still a bit shocked. I plan to take it to WP:DRN, but first I need to cool down a bit. Do you have any better idea ? --Rsk6400 (talk) 06:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It might eventually come to that and I've considered it as well. I've never been involved in dispute resolution, but I think we should absolutely exhaust all attempts at consensus first, and it's definitely a good idea to let things calm down and let people have their say. The Rfc also needs to be closed first ("We cannot accept disputes that are already under discussion at other content or conduct dispute resolution forums or in decision-making processes such as Requests for comments, Articles for deletion, or Requested moves.") I think that most of the editors in the debate are open to finding a solution - only 2-3 seem to be against any sort of compromise. But yeah, it's quite likely some sort of dispute resolution or even arbitration will be necessary, if edit warring persists once the Rfc (and the debate around it) concludes. --Tserton (talk) 14:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Turks in Germany dispute

[edit]

Hi Tserton, could you weigh in on this discussion[1] so we can reach consensus? I see you are one of the more active editors on this article so it would be much appreciated. Will Tyson for real (talk) 02:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are an experienced moderator can I ask for your advice? Sseevv keeps editing the contested sections of the article without anyone agreeing to it. This keeps muddying the waters by continually changing what was under debate before we have reached a resolution, I asked why he kept doing this earlier in the discussion but got no response and he did it again. I just asked him to stop again. He also accused me (and others) of sock puppeting and before that Vandalism, and reverted another user (not me) who tried to change those sections since, the other user received a warning but Ssevv didnt. He also removed the sources I had added originally entirely, which I would be fine with if it was just to wait for a consensus first but he also done countless edits since early December. His behaviour is mentioned in examples of disruptive editing,[2] points 1, 2, 4 and 5 apply to his behavior. However I didn't find a noticeboard for disruptive editing, and the incidents noticeboard has no option for reporting it. Is this acceptable behavior? How should I proceed? Will Tyson for real (talk) 01:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify - I'm not a moderator, and Wikipedia doesn't have moderators. Your words carry just as much weight as mine and anyone else's (except those of administrators in certain very specific situations).
You're correct that it's considered good practice not to carry out disputed edits while the discussion is in progress, but this isn't a hard-and-fast policy, since bold editing is important to Wikipedia. If you feel a certain edit is strongly contentious, revert it. Given that this is a specific dispute largely between two users, you might try dispute resolution - but be aware that this is a form of mediation, not discipline.
You can also make a Request for Comment (RfC), but you'll have to formulate a very specific question that people can respond to - not many editors will be willing to read through the entire thread to figure out what's going on (as I said, I'm having trouble pinpointing the substance of the dispute myself). If the subject of the dispute is appropriate for an RfC, I can help set one up if you'd like (although you shouldn't be afraid of trying it yourself - just read up on the documentation). --Tserton (talk) 02:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also: don't pay attention to editors bandying accusations of sock-puppeting or vandalism on talk pages. More often than not, they undermine their own credibility when they do so, and the only place where such words have any real meaning is at the appropriate noticeboards. --Tserton (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the response, I posted another response actually attempting to summarize the disagreement and I just now saw your response here, honest to god coincidence. And my mistake, I meant the same thing as administrator when I said moderator. If I do go foreword with submitting a request for comment I suppose I would narrow it down to the question of whether its appropriate to have political speech's and embassy estimates when more academic sources are available. As I stated in my most recent comment on the relevant talkpage everything else was just supporting arguments by comparison. My main fear about reverting Sseevv is being accused of edit warring, which wouldn't entirely be wrong if I reverted him more than three times (I already did so twice in early December), even though he basically bullied me off the article, which is why I've tried to argue these points with him on the talkpage. Thanks again. Will Tyson for real (talk) 05:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Will Tyson for real:Just to clarify further: I'm also not an admin. Just a bog-standard user like you haha. Anyway, just wanted to say that dealing with editors you find unconstructive is usually a thankless task, since backing down in an edit war means unprincipled users can temporarily "hijack" an article. But it's often the easiest way to move forward - the debate will go on and find a resolution based on the facts, and the edits reverted if it's called for. And you won't be steamrollered even when you're in the minority - your participation on the talk page will be reflected in whatever consensus ends up being hammered out. Only when deciding between mutually exclusive options are people ever "overruled," and then usually only by overwhelming consensus. Anyway, I hope you aren't put off editing Wikipedia and continue to volunteer. --Tserton (talk) 11:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tether (cryptocurrency) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lai Đại Hàn on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for "Germans"

[edit]

Only to vent my frustration at the delay of the closure: The date (2031) in your comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups reminded me of an old friend who jokingly told me that she will get the vaccination in 2026. BTW: She has at least two ethnicities, while her children have three: Basque, Spanish, German.

Just in case it becomes necessary, should we write a summary for WP:DRN together ? --Rsk6400 (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Volt edits / Dutch election threshold

[edit]

Just a heads-up: Dutch threshold is getting the minimum for a seat, which has a different percentage in EU setting and in national setting. In national elections that's about 0.7%. Your calculation in the edit comment is probably about correct. --LaPingvino (talk) 01:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More on the ethnic group pages

[edit]

Hi Tserton, I thoroughly support what you have done and tried to do for the above. I've tried recently to edit the 'English People' page. After making some quite major edits I've backed down and have simply tried to include a version of one of the Wikiproject (Ethnic Groups) piece of text, i.e.:

This article covers the <GROUP> as an ethnic group, not <GROUP> meaning citizens of <COUNTRY>

Strictly speaking there are no citizens of England so the version I have ended up suggesting is:

This article is about English people as an ethnic group, not English people meaning inhabitants of England.

My key argument is that this brings the WP article into closer accord with the OED definition of the adjective 'English', which is:

'Of or belonging to England (or Britain) or its inhabitants.' The OED adds 'In early use sometimes spec[ifically]. designating inhabitants of England of Anglo-Saxon descent, in contradistinction to those of Celtic, Scandinavian, or Norman descent.'

The insistence on focusing solely on something resembling (according to the OED) the non-current usage to the exclusion of the current usage, I find difficult to understand. I have laid my argument out (admittedly belatedly) on the talk page but I'm not sure if there will be any response and suspect that any further edits will just get reverted without backup or by claiming the more succinct statement is better, simply because it is more succinct. If you are able to offer any advice on how to proceed with this I would really appreciate it, even if it's just to say that I have gone about this in the wrong way and would do better to now leave it.

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Woman on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the United States on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turks in Germany

[edit]

Hi Tserton, I hope this message finds you well. As you have edited the article in the past I would very much appreciate your comments on how we can finally resolve the dispute. I recognise we are on opposite sides on the debate but the double standards and personal digs by "User:Will Tyson for real" is getting too much now. I'm all for discussing the issues and reaching a compromise, but I really can't deal with these ridiculous edit wars and repetitive arguments. Sorry for the rant. Kind regards, Sseevv (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I've weighed in on the RfC. As for personal digs, I don't know what to tell you other than that editing Wikipedia sometimes requires thick skin, and when others get personal it's best not to engage and focus on the substance. --Tserton (talk) 12:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Justice for Uncompensated Survivors Today (JUST) Act of 2017 on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Archimedes on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Blackbird (land yacht) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sex and gender distinction on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European migrant crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asylum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2021 Cuban protests on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abortion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Afghanistan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed

[edit]

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.


Sent to project members 13:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jakarta MRT on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2021 Canadian federal election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject British Royalty on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lachin on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:La République En Marche! on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lakhimpur Kheri violence on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Irreversible Damage on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lithium-ion battery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ionic conductivity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cannabis (drug) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Kazakh protests on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vision therapy on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Francisco Franco on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Good Party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:French Communist Party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Climate change on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Glossary of areas of mathematics on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Opinion polling on Scottish independence on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Greased piglet on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Webb's First Deep Field on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent expansion of the Aari language article. Well done! LandLing 23:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Leary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

School appears to be closed. I am unable to find reliable sources about the school

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semafor request

[edit]

Hello, Tserton. Thanks again for reviewing my requests for Semafor (website) and updating the article on my behalf. A week or so ago I posted a request to address the section about China, which is problematic because the text is not based on what sources actually say about Semafor. Do you have a moment to review my concerns and proposed text? I'd appreciate any feedback or updates. SemaforMP (talk) 17:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your message. I'd quite forgotten about the edit requests, so thanks for reminding me. I've responded on the Semafor talk page. --Tserton (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Justin B. Smith

[edit]

Hello again, Tserton. You may have seen that I've submitted some COI edit requests for the Justin B. Smith biography at Talk:Justin B. Smith. I could use assistance with several requests on the page, but I've specifically solicited your feedback on the China text given your work at Talk:Semafor (website). Would you be able to review my concerns? Again, I'd appreciate any feedback or article updates. SemaforMP (talk) 14:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Triglycerol has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 29 § Triglycerol until a consensus is reached.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Core Contest has now begun!

[edit]

The Core Contest has now begun! Evaluate your article's current state, gather sources, and have at it! You have until May 31 (23:59 UTC) to make eligible changes; although you are most welcome (and encouraged) to continue work on the article, changes after May 31 will not be considered for rankings and their prizes. Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 03:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

The Core Contest is halfway through!

[edit]

Hello Core Contest participants, we've officially hit the halfway mark! With just over three weeks remaining until the May 31 deadline (23:59 UTC), it's time to ramp up our efforts. Remember, Wikipedia wants to be edited!

Now is a good time to set goals for your article: What section needs the most improvement? Which sources remain unused? How can you best spend your time? Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 02:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

The 2024 Core Contest has ended!

[edit]

The Core Contest has now ended! Thank you for your interest and efforts. Make sure that you include both a "start" and "improvement diff" on the entries page. The judges will begin delibertaing shortly and annouce the winners within the next few weeks. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 00:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]