User talk:Truthdowser

Welcome from Redwolf24

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes ([[User:Redwolf24|Redwolf24]] 04:39, 14 July 2005 (UTC)) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes ([[User:Redwolf24|Redwolf24]]) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 25 December 2024 T 14:56 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

Disambiguation answer

I'm not sure if you saw it, but I tried to give you a clearer answer at the New Contributors' Help Page. Let me know if you have other questions. -- Nataly a 14:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good plan. And don't worry, everyone has to start out somewhere, and if you make a mistake, plenty of people will be happy to help you (or, at least they should be!). Just remember, Wikipedia encourages you to be bold! -- Nataly a 13:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zundapp Janus

Feel free to remove my  comment on this page if you have evidence. A bit of history may help: Category:MR layout cars was originally a list, List of MR Cars, but the list was AfD'd and consensus was to make it into a category. I did the conversion by hand, and placed a comment whenever the article didn't mention that the car had an MR layout (hopefully eventually encouraging better sourcing eventually). To prevent future doubts, it may be a good idea to make sure that the article's also in Category:Rear wheel drive vehicles and Category:Mid-engined vehicles. --ais523 10:00, 26 August 2006 (U T C)

"Mr. Deity"

The article "Mr. Deity" has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 18:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An(other) contributor(s) established an article later... http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mr._Deity truthdowser (talk) 00:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ladonia

Hello!

Thanks for the accurate coordinates in the article. I suppose they mark the position of Wotan’s tower? Do you know where exactly Gene is and can you give me the exact coordinates? Thanks --Quilbert (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the coordinates 56.2878N 12.5394E in the article http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ladonia_%28micronation%29 was merely a point amongst the coastal structures as first found on medium resolution Swedish aerial photos (and confirmed by Lars Vilks), (now visible on Google maps).truthdowser (talk) 00:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boulwar

Good job. I've moved it out into mainspace. DS (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't think it quite ready for prime-time but thanks... http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Lemuel_Boulware truthdowser (talk) 00:07, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3D rendering

Hello,

remembering your excellent rendering of the RQ-170 Sentinel, do you think that you could find the time to reiterate your achievements with the Sukhoi PAK FA?

Cheers! Rama (talk) 10:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rama; Firstly thank you for your esteem. Secondly this is a gracious request from someone who originally illustrated the RQ-170 article. I am not finished with the RQ-170 model/illustration yet; I am desperately trying to get a copy of the February issue of Combat Aircraft Monthly which has a new series of exclusive photos of the vehicle, and I know my representation falls a bit short of what I believe to be Wikipedia standards at this point. The Sukhoi_PAK_FA looks exponentially more difficult to model. Your faith in my skills flatters me. The article of course ideally would have an illustration soon. The image in the article at this time seems clearly copyright infringement. (I am quite sure a model derived from various copyrighted images and rendered from a different angle is not copyright infringement or original research, as almost anyone can look at the model and the images and see that they clearly resemble each other.) I am wondering if the PAK FA is significant, it looks highly derivative of the F-22 Raptor which itself has been in development for two decades and has all but been canceled. truthdowser (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the photo used for the Russian language Wiki on the Sukhoi PAK FA is from the manufacturer's own publicity for the aircraft. http://www.sukhoi.org/news/company/?%20id=3142 Would that not be considered fair use? truthdowser (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it would, but the core of the matter is precisely to replace Fair Use images with Free ones. The non-Free policy states "Non-free media may be used in articles only if: (...) It's used for a purpose that can't be fulfilled by free material (text or images, existing or to be created)" (my emphasis). A replacement is thus not only desirable, but required by the policy.

It seems that there is enough documentation available for an isometric view to be created, I'll give it a try as I did with the Sentinel, maybe with more accuracy this time. This all reinforces my long-frustrated desire to achieve some proficiency with Blender. Thank you and cheers! Rama (talk) 12:11, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		In recognition of your excellent work in illustrating the RQ-170 Sentinel‎ and the consultative way in which you have carried this out. Nick-D (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sent you an email...

Hi Truthdowser...sent you a message through the email address you have listed...want to talk about using your images and how you want to be attributed. Thanks! AKRadecki^Speaketh 22:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Brody (correspondent)

The article David Brody (correspondent) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Charmlet ^-talk- 23:19, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RQ-170

Hi Truthdowser, just noticed your models of the RQ-170. Great stuff and very useful to wikipedia. In case you have time to do some further models for wikipedia, it could be very useful to some pages. I specifically have some UFO pages in mind, where there are good indications of the sighted craft, but no free pictures. If you ever have time, energy or interest in these, please let me know. JMK (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RQ-170

Hello, Truthdowser. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Is there still a way to get ahold of you? A certain student wants to ask you about your RQ-170 model. Your Yahoo email account seems to have been disabled or discontinued. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 00:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC) (Marcus Qwertyus)[reply]

Larry Erickson subpage

Hi, I was just going through some cleanup and I found User:Truthdowser/Larry Erickson and User:Truthdowser/Shaker peg which seem to be a stale drafts. The Erickson one has nothing to work with but Shaker peg could be created with a bit of cleanup. Just wanted to check in. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Truthdowser. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Truthdowser. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kempower

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kempower, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kempower moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kempower. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and see WP:SOLUTION. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"promotional and reads like an advertisement"?! I've contributed to Wikipedia for over 2 decades, have zero connection to Kempower, including zero financial interest and this is an up and coming European company now building public infrastructure in North America. I put significant effort into creating that article just to have it deleted. No wonder Wikipedia doesn't have enough quality editors. Forget it. truthdowser (talk) 12:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kempower (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kempower

Hello, Truthdowser. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kempower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kempower

Hello, Truthdowser. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kempower".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:12, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]