User talk:Tris Wilson/Archives/2014/June
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Tris Wilson. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
VacationValet Channel ref. account
As far as I know i'm the only one with access to this account, additionally I was under the impression that I was well within the posting policies of wikipedia/media. The quagmire of registration with all entities and ultimately being on target with every instance of registration is really quite impossible. Could you please point out the mistake, if any, I've made in posting or registration; after my review, I found none. I'm completely agreeable to making any necessary changes or corrections with regards to my account. Thank you, James(VacationValet Channel); and as a foot note I need to correct it to it's further extrapolation of (The VacationValet Channel, so as to abbreviate to TV2C.com); again another registration process. Thanks, again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.151.46.222 (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
What I'm saying is that the account name implies that you are editing on behalf of a group - it doesn't matter who has access. However, if you want to change your username, you can go here and follow the instructions - all your edits will be re-attributed. I hope this doesn't discourage you from editing - Wikipedia is really a great place. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 17:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
delsort.js
I really appreciate the script. :) Little thing: Could you perhaps make it context sensitive...i.e., only appearing on AfD pages? I think you could use something like this:
if (wgPageName.indexOf('Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/') != -1 && wgPageName.indexOf('Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/200') == -1) {
Keep up the good work! —Theopolisme (talk) 23:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Should be working now - I'll test in a bit. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 00:44, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Almost working, just need to change 200 to 201. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 00:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Reverted an edit in "Anti-establishment"
Hey there. I'm not wedded to it, but I think I was helping by adding dead prez into Anti-establishment. They fit extremely well with the other information already on the page--albeit I think I would agree if someone proposed that the entire page needed a major overhaul that might end up with no mention of dead prez.
Nonetheless: What? Why? Did you read the article? Are you familiar with the works of dead prez?
70.171.7.240 (talk) 13:57, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Looking more closely at the edit, I see what you mean. I'll go ahead and revert it, and if you want, I can remove the warning. Thanks for letting me know. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 13:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
Hi, I removed the BLP prod that you added to Sarfaraz Saifi because another editor added a source. If you believe that the article still does not meet inclusion criteria feel free to initiate an AfD or traditional prod. J04n(talk page) 15:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Assume Good Faith
You should have assumed good faith by leaving a message on my talk page instead of taking me for a common troll. Do you even know who I am? I made that edit because I believed it to be constructive, and I can't believe you would revert it without consulting me. If you do something like that again, I will report you for arbitration. —72.215.153.100 (talk) 19:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Your edit looked like an unconstructive edit. It didn't help the page... why would you redirect the page? This is vandalism, especially since you WP:EDITWARred to re-add it. Even if it was constructive, Fox didn't need permission to readd it; see WP:BRD. Arbitration is unnecessary here. If you really think Fox violated a core Wikipedia policy, feel free to report it at WP:ANI. Vacation9 19:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
User space
Hi. I'm so sorry because I didn't save my subpage in my user space but I don't know how to do it. I come from pt:WP and there we have Subpages categories. Here I d'ont understand how to do it. Is a little confusion. Nini ✉ 18:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nini00 (talk • contribs)
Sorry I'm so sleepy! I wrote "usuário" instead "user" even on my signature! It happens, first 24 hours here Nini ✉ 18:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that. I believe you're looking for how to save subpages in your userspace. This can be done by simply creating a page starting with, in your case, "User:Nini00/". If you wanted to create an article on a Potato, you would do "User:Nini00/Potato". Hope this helped. Vacation9 19:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
"Shiny Thingy" on VoxelBot
IMO, it clutters VBot's userpage. There is already a vandal info template on the page. Vacationnine Public 15:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Fine... :) It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 16:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
TUSC token d29f0e238df79b692d3c1500afc284e3
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Help
{{Help me}}
Can users !vote on AfDs concerning pages they have created? (the answer is probably staring at me in the face in the policy, but, you know, I never can see those ;)) It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 00:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. Why ever not? There is only one creator, so that's just one !vote in a mix of others. As you have indicated it's not a vote - it's up to the editors to put a case for keep or delete with reference to the policies. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Decline of Lenzman article
Hello,
I noticed you just declined my article on Lenzman. The main reason being 'the golden rule' (significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent) Well I looked up the golden rule and one of the sources is an interview in Mixmag, a leading dance music magazine. I'm not sure how that doesn't qualify under the golden rule?
Can you please explain what I've done wrong, because I've done my utmost to make this article work.
Thank you,
Teye — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.106.109.136 (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oh wow... I was looking at the "External links" section. I am extremely sorry. Please add the review tag back, I'll see if I can get another uninvolved editor to accept. Thanks for letting me know. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 23:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- That would be much appreciated. The review tag is back on! Many thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.106.109.136 (talk) 09:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Log rotation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Log file (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
- Featured content: A lousy week
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
List of Rivers by name.
Hi Fox Wilson, Hope you read my reply regarding the speedy deletion of the 'List of Rivers by name' Do you genuinely think a list would be not worth hosting on Wikipedia? regards James emmans — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jemmans (talk • contribs) 15:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Please look at the reason given for deletion, which I believe was A10. This means that the subject of the article or list is already covered somewhere else on Wikipedia, in this case, List of rivers covered it. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 19:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Sandbox categorized
Hi Fox Wilson, by including Hello in your sandbox template, your userpage appears categorized in Category:English words and Category:Greeting words and phrases. I am using the former as an example category for what kind of articles belong to all the subcategories of Category:Words and phrases by language and I'm not sure how to remove your sandbox from the category without adding noinclude tags in Hello. Hoverfish Talk 18:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry about that. I was testing ParserFunctions, and I guess I forgot to clear my sandbox. I've gone ahead and cleared it, thanks for telling me. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 19:17, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar
The da Vinci Barnstar | ||
I award you this barnstar for your work on VoxelBot and the auto-updates it makes to Template:Vandalism information. From the day I first designed Template:WikiDefcon/levels back in 2011 to your bot today, the classification of vandalism levels has become less subjective and more reliable. The information is of great use to us all. Thank you! CJ Drop me a line! • Contribs 23:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
your revert
here was not helpful. Please make yourself familiar with the new interwiki feature of Wikidata. Thx. -- 109.48.76.201 (talk) 23:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oops, missed that. I guess I was confused because I wasn't seeing any interwiki links on the page... My mistake. I'm still rather confused about interwikis with Wikidata -- I'll see what I can do. Thanks. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 01:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Door prize
"revert promo"
Help me understand this. Tree Proximity (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- I reverted it because it seemed to be promotional material -- although it was sourced, it's not a very good thing to put in the lead section. Thanks for editing! It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 14:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I am not sure what happened but it seems like your bot has generated a number of double redirects somehow. I also operate a bot to fix double redirects and do not want to make this look like a turf war. I realize fixing double redirects is a thankless and mindless task and suggest cooperation perhaps? -- A Certain White Cat chi? 01:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not the one who coded that part of the bot -- you could talk to Vacation9 about that. In short though, it's doing that as part of a fix for Romanian characters, it won't/shouldn't fix double redirects unless it moved a page as well. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 11:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Your delsort script
Hi there. I just noticed that you were developing User:Fox Wilson/delsort.js, which made me very happy because I've been waiting for a good delsort script for ages. :) I tried adding it to my vector.js, though, and it doesn't seem to be working. (The buttons appear on AfD pages, but nothing happens when you click them.) Is the script in a usable state? I'd love to get it working properly. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) It works for me - have you purged the page in your browser? If so, do any errors show in your javascript console? Vacation9 15:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, I purged the page. I got the following error when I tried clicking on one the "academics and educators" delsort link at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complete Set Character (probably a good job it didn't work this time, because that's definitely the wrong category):
- Error: SyntaxError: JSON.parse: unexpected end of data
- Source File: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Fox_Wilson/delsort.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript
- Line: 89
- I'm using Firefox 18.0.2 at the moment. Any ideas? — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Interesting... it worked for me ([1]) I'm using Chrome. Line 89 gets edit tokens; do you mind visiting this link a few times and telling me if you get any errors (obviously don't say what it includes)? Vacation9 15:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Nope, no errors from that link at all. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- The problem is that it's parsing the data before it's ready. You or Fox need to change
xhr.readyState==4
on line 88 toxhr.readyState==4 && xhr.status==200
, then it should all be perfect. Vacation9 15:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)- Ok, I updated the script, and I tried clicking on the "academics and educators" delsort link at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complete Set Character again. This time there were no errors! ...but the script still didn't do any deletion sorting. :( I'm afraid I shall have to continue this conversation tomorrow - sleep is calling. Thank you for all your help so far! — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Alright, see you in the morning. Sorry to hear you're still having problems; you purged the page correct? It must be a local JavaScript issue or something, or a Firefox issue. I'll look into it later. Vacation9 15:45, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, I purged the page. Otherwise I would have got the old error again, I assume. Anyway, g'night. :) — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:46, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- For when you wake up, I tried it in Firefox 18.0.1 and it worked perfectly... if there are no errors, I don't know... do you have a "disable Javascript" security option somewhere? I'm a Chrome user. Vacation9 17:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- And I *just* now notice this. I'll fix the script. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 22:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Nevermind, you're an admin, didn't notice that :P It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 22:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- For when you wake up, I tried it in Firefox 18.0.1 and it worked perfectly... if there are no errors, I don't know... do you have a "disable Javascript" security option somewhere? I'm a Chrome user. Vacation9 17:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, I purged the page. Otherwise I would have got the old error again, I assume. Anyway, g'night. :) — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:46, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Alright, see you in the morning. Sorry to hear you're still having problems; you purged the page correct? It must be a local JavaScript issue or something, or a Firefox issue. I'll look into it later. Vacation9 15:45, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, I updated the script, and I tried clicking on the "academics and educators" delsort link at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complete Set Character again. This time there were no errors! ...but the script still didn't do any deletion sorting. :( I'm afraid I shall have to continue this conversation tomorrow - sleep is calling. Thank you for all your help so far! — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- The problem is that it's parsing the data before it's ready. You or Fox need to change
- Nope, no errors from that link at all. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Interesting... it worked for me ([1]) I'm using Chrome. Line 89 gets edit tokens; do you mind visiting this link a few times and telling me if you get any errors (obviously don't say what it includes)? Vacation9 15:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, I purged the page. I got the following error when I tried clicking on one the "academics and educators" delsort link at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complete Set Character (probably a good job it didn't work this time, because that's definitely the wrong category):
User:Ais523/adminrights.js is a handy script. Vacation9 22:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- I just tried delsort.js in Safari/iOS, and it worked fine. Will experiment with some different setups later on. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ♪ talk ♪ 06:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Aha! I've found the cause of the problem - the script doesn't work when you are logged into the secure server. On the normal server it works fine for me, but on the secure server clicking on a delsort link does nothing. Would this be difficult to fix? — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ♪ talk ♪ 09:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, that makes some sense. Should be able to implement something by the end of the day if all goes well. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 11:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into it for me. :) — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Vacation9 provided a quick fix,, and I have updated the script. Now it also works on the secure server! Woo! I'm guessing it would break if someone tried to use it through the old secure server, though, but that doesn't strike me as such a pressing need. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Also, I couldn't resist adding a link to the AfD discussion to the edit summary for the delsort page. I usually check the AfDs directly from the watchlist without bothering to open the delsort page itself, so I thought adding this to the script might be useful. Of course, feel free to revert it or tweak it however you want, though. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- I meant to do that at one point :) so it's definitely for the better It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 13:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- I hope you don't mind, but I also created some documentation for the script at User:Fox Wilson/delsort, and I tweaked the edit summaries to link to it. Your script now has its very own shortcut - WP:FWDS (that's short for Fox Wilson Deletion Sorting). This is the last time I'll mess with your page, I promise, and feel free to undo any of my changes (or to choose a different shortcut). — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Quite frankly, I really don't mind :) At some point, I'll probably create a user-configuration option though, so that might be useful. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 17:02, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- I hope you don't mind, but I also created some documentation for the script at User:Fox Wilson/delsort, and I tweaked the edit summaries to link to it. Your script now has its very own shortcut - WP:FWDS (that's short for Fox Wilson Deletion Sorting). This is the last time I'll mess with your page, I promise, and feel free to undo any of my changes (or to choose a different shortcut). — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- I meant to do that at one point :) so it's definitely for the better It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 13:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Also, I couldn't resist adding a link to the AfD discussion to the edit summary for the delsort page. I usually check the AfDs directly from the watchlist without bothering to open the delsort page itself, so I thought adding this to the script might be useful. Of course, feel free to revert it or tweak it however you want, though. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Vacation9 provided a quick fix,, and I have updated the script. Now it also works on the secure server! Woo! I'm guessing it would break if someone tried to use it through the old secure server, though, but that doesn't strike me as such a pressing need. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into it for me. :) — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, that makes some sense. Should be able to implement something by the end of the day if all goes well. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 11:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Aha! I've found the cause of the problem - the script doesn't work when you are logged into the secure server. On the normal server it works fine for me, but on the secure server clicking on a delsort link does nothing. Would this be difficult to fix? — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ♪ talk ♪ 09:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
AWB is good to go
Hi Wilson. I've added your name to AWB user list. If you need any additional help, just ask. Wifione Message 10:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
VoxelBot errors
I want to inform you about some errors made by your VoxelBot. VoxelBot performed task named "Replacing incorrect Romanian characters with correct characters", but during this replaced bot replaced not only Romanian, but also Turkish characters, which is not correct replacement. Here are some examples:
- Article Temeşvar Eyalet was named in Turkish, not in Romanian. This was province of Ottoman Empire whose official language was Turkish and character "ş" is shared by both languages, Turkish and Romanian. However, character in this name was not Romanian but Turkish. Your both renamed "Temeşvar" to "Temeșvar" and as far as I know there is no such letter in Turkish. Can you please revert name of that page to correct Turkish title?
- In some articles, bot also changed other Turkish names and transformed Turkish character into Romanian one. Here are examples: [2], [3]. Can you please correct these errors? Also, you should not perform more similar tasks with this bot so that further damage is not made. So far, I noticed that only shared Turkish-Romanian character "ş" is wrongly transformed by a bot, but you should check for other possible similar characters in two languages before you proceed with bot tasks. Thank you. 178.253.204.37 (talk) 14:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Please check this: S-comma - "This letter however was not part of the early Unicode versions, and not in the predecessors like ISO/IEC_8859-2 and Windows-1250, which is why Ş (S-cedilla) is often used in digital texts in Romanian. S-cedilla was introduced for computers for the sake of the Turkish language, and later it was used unchanged also for the Romanian language." 178.253.204.37 (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm in charge of this area of the bot, so I'll answer your concerns. These types of errors were discussed in the BRFA and, sadly, are unavoidable since the bot is an automated editor and can't detect this. This is hopefully an isolated incident. I rolled back the edits you mentioned, but the article title seems Romanian from looking at the lead. This shouldn't happen any more since from now on it will be running on strictly Romanian articles. Those pages were from the Banat category which was safe to run on because the other two countries which Banat is located in don't use that character. Thanks for letting me know! Vacation9 15:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I would disagree that Banat region is safe area for bot tasks. That territory was part of Ottoman Empire for about two centuries and that is why Turkish names are used in some Banat articles. Let now go back to Temeşvar Eyalet article. Title of that article is not Romanian. Please check what changes bot made there: [4]. From a second paragraph you can see how this Ottoman province was named in different languages. You can see that Temeşvar, Tımışvar or Tamışvar are Turkish names for the province, while Romanian name is Eialetul Timişoarei or Paşalâcul Timişoara. From diff which I provided is clear that bot changed Turkish name of the title and also changed all Turkish names in article itself. "Temeşvar" is Turkish name only, not used in Romanian. You really should correct that. 178.253.205.140 (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- I've rolled back and corrected that one, thank you. Please not the bot is finished now. I was told in the Bot Request that Banat was a safe area, but I guess not. Happy editing, and let me know if you find more. Vacation9 14:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- I did found few more: [5], [6], [7]. 178.253.202.142 (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- I've rolled back and corrected that one, thank you. Please not the bot is finished now. I was told in the Bot Request that Banat was a safe area, but I guess not. Happy editing, and let me know if you find more. Vacation9 14:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I would disagree that Banat region is safe area for bot tasks. That territory was part of Ottoman Empire for about two centuries and that is why Turkish names are used in some Banat articles. Let now go back to Temeşvar Eyalet article. Title of that article is not Romanian. Please check what changes bot made there: [4]. From a second paragraph you can see how this Ottoman province was named in different languages. You can see that Temeşvar, Tımışvar or Tamışvar are Turkish names for the province, while Romanian name is Eialetul Timişoarei or Paşalâcul Timişoara. From diff which I provided is clear that bot changed Turkish name of the title and also changed all Turkish names in article itself. "Temeşvar" is Turkish name only, not used in Romanian. You really should correct that. 178.253.205.140 (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm in charge of this area of the bot, so I'll answer your concerns. These types of errors were discussed in the BRFA and, sadly, are unavoidable since the bot is an automated editor and can't detect this. This is hopefully an isolated incident. I rolled back the edits you mentioned, but the article title seems Romanian from looking at the lead. This shouldn't happen any more since from now on it will be running on strictly Romanian articles. Those pages were from the Banat category which was safe to run on because the other two countries which Banat is located in don't use that character. Thanks for letting me know! Vacation9 15:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Please check this: S-comma - "This letter however was not part of the early Unicode versions, and not in the predecessors like ISO/IEC_8859-2 and Windows-1250, which is why Ş (S-cedilla) is often used in digital texts in Romanian. S-cedilla was introduced for computers for the sake of the Turkish language, and later it was used unchanged also for the Romanian language." 178.253.204.37 (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Just a mistake
I was going to write they have a lot of animals but my sister erased it and also made that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.222.216.186 (talk) 20:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Judy Chicago's Article
Hi there, how are you? I am very familiar with the guidelines on biographical entries on Wiki and also with what is considered an appropriate number of sources. What I am saying to you here is that the sources cited don't count because they are 1, fraudulent, 2, citing information that does not actually appear in the texts they cite. To my mind, this would seem to urgently need some sort of BLP tab - is there one that you would suggest that is appropriate for 1, fraud, 2, plagiarism, 3, slander of a living person? Thank you for your hard work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.175.114 (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- You can use {{verify credibility}} for sources. I would *highly* recommend starting a thread on the article talk page if you haven't already done so. Thanks for editing, and being WP:CIVIL. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 20:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message! I started a discussion on the talk page when I first noticed that incorrect AND plagiarised information (two different things) appeared on a page devoted to a living relative of mine. Thank you for the information and again for the hard work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.175.114 (talk) 20:52, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Just an FYI: Don't forget to WP:SIGN your posts! :) Thanks again for editing. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 23:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message! I started a discussion on the talk page when I first noticed that incorrect AND plagiarised information (two different things) appeared on a page devoted to a living relative of mine. Thank you for the information and again for the hard work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.175.114 (talk) 20:52, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Forum for meta-changes?
I have an idea for a wikipedia addition. I think it would be nice to be able to follow arguments as opposed to "just" non-controversial knowledge. Imagine that there would be pages with hypothesises, stating clearly in a preluding section (or in some kind of endnote like todays sources) which premisses are used to evaluate the hypothesis. In the page for the hypothesis, both pro- and con- arguments would be listed. Also, it would be nice to have a section of consequences, i.e. other hypothesises that need the current argument to hold up to scrutiny. In this way, for well-managed topics, it would be possible to follow a chain of arguments back to the roots without clogging the text with proofs and doubts unnecessary to the average reader. If this idea is successful, it might mean that scientists would start using wikipedia as the place of universal evaluation and stating of arguments, making them available to the public. Now, my question to you is, if I want to advocate such an idea, where do I take it? Is there a forum for meta changes somewhere, or a group to join or something like that? Best Regards, Peter. --PeterVargen (talk) 10:38, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Meta is the place. Vacation9 13:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
AN/TPS-43 vandal
I had to revert your warning on Talk:AN/TPS-43 on an unblock template. This is a known case of one user in Colombia constanly putting extraneous images in the article, non-stop since 2006 (check article's history). At this point the article is semi-protected so he now has fun on the Talk page. He is blocked on sight for one year. He uses whatever unblocked IP he can find in his country. Please keep an eye out and revert then report to AIV. thanks! -- Alexf(talk) 20:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Wikify has been deprecated
Hi Fox! Just dropping you a note to let you know that {{wikify}} has been deprecated in favor of more specific templates, such as {{underlinked}}. Since the release version of AWB is still automatically adding {{wikify}}, I suggest you install the latest SVN snapshot instead, which has a lot of fixes in it. Thanks, and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 02:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks for letting me know. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 02:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!
Teahouse First Birthday Badge | |
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. |
- --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers
- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
delsort.js
Hi, I was looking through the code in delsort.js and wanted to point out that you can drop the edittoken API request by using mw.user.tokens. There's some documentation at mw:RL/DM#user.tokens. Legoktm (talk) 07:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, that certainly saved several lines :) It's a Fox! (What did I break) 13:31, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
This is a test
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, {{{1}}}, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "{{{1}}}" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! It's a Fox! (What did I break) 13:27, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- A couple comments. I think it would be good to include a "call to action" here, that is, suggesting that the problem might be addressed by things like adding sources or sourcing indvidual claims that would show notability via GNG or an SNG, respectively. Maybe even just the GNG bit, like {{notabilty}} does, and/or phrasing that suggests that non-notable articles may be eligible for deletion? Second, for long-term tagged articles, is it at all possible (and this might be a stretch) to make note of the fact that they've been tagged a really long time? Anyway, really cool either way, just some suggestions. Cheers, --j⚛e deckertalk 17:42, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- I edited a bit, how is that? Suggestions appreciated. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 00:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- I added some blurb about adding sources, and included the {{find sources}} template. {{find sources}} itself might need some tweaking in order to make this look pretty, though. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ♪ talk ♪ 03:20, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oooh, better. Cool! --j⚛e deckertalk 07:04, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
delsort.js
Thank you for making this script. I haven't been able to get it to work. Have I installed it incorrectly? User:Mkdw/monobook.js. I use chrome and clicked both refresh on the browser and the purge button I added to the Wikipedia tool set. Mkdwtalk 01:00, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, it's not working for me in vector either. Maybe an issue related to the recent update? — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:41, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Probably the edit token thingy, I'll see what I can do. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 01:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- I found something interesting. I got Fox's version to work, but it covers up the other tabs. See the two below screen shots.
- Also when I click the button it prompts me for a manual input of the category instead of a drop down menu. Mkdwtalk 03:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Quite frankly, it was designed more for Vector :) I'll do a Monobook version which places the links in the Interaction area. Should be done in a few minutes. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 13:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Done use delsort-monobook.js instead of delsort.js. Links will be placed in the "interaction" area in the side panel. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 13:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Probably the edit token thingy, I'll see what I can do. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 01:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Xaiml
What do you suggest that I do to keep the Xaiml page? I feel that the page is relevant and useful. Just tell me what should be done and I will do it.
Thank you,
DevynCJohnson (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- The reason given was notability. I found that the subject of the article did not meet the notability guideline, this isn't exactly something you can correct. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 22:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
Just wanted to give you a heads up that I removed the PROD tag from the artice What's In The Bible. It had already been Proded and removed. reddogsix (talk) 22:17, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, This is a test and you should ignore it, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "This is a test and you should ignore it" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 19:51, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, This is also a test which you should ignore, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "This is also a test which you should ignore" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 19:51, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Purely from the 'history standpoint,' have you considered changing the edit summary to
/* Article notability notification */ new section
? —Theopolisme (talk) 19:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)- Doing so now. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 20:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Done. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 20:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Fab! :) —Theopolisme (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Voxelbot
Hi Fox, Voxelbot has gone into Zzz again. It's been more than 2 days since it updated vandalism info. Please fix the problem. Thanks, Arctic Kangaroo 07:59, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed now. Thanks for letting me know. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 10:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Barry Pring
Thank you for your feedback here, I am working to demonstrate it falls within wikipedia guidelines for inclusion. NorthLondoner NorthLondoner (talk) 22:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Fox, NorthLondoner was my name when I was quite active on Wikipedia a few years ago. Then, coming back, I asked for my user name to be changed to my real name - Graham Phillips. I guess it only changed the name on my talk page though, rather than actual username. So, that's that :) NorthLondoner 10:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, I looked at the rename logs and in in the CHU archives, and you technically shouldn't be able to login as NorthLondoner anymore if I'm correct. That's odd. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 10:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Fox :) I figured everything would just go under my real name - Graham Phillips - but when the NorthLondoner stayed, I just let it stand. Btw, I've done some work on Pring, what do you think? NorthLondoner NorthLondoner (talk) 11:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Fox Wilson; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Not again...
Voxel is sleeping... Arctic Kangaroo 16:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hooray!*ahem* yes I'll fix in a bit. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 19:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC)- Oh, I didn't see this. Fixed 30 minutes ago. In the future, try to notify both of us. It looks like I wasn't referring to an absolute path so it was having errors reading a file. Vacation9 19:33, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, alright. Vacation9: Can you commit the new/fixed code? Thanks. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 19:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't see this. Fixed 30 minutes ago. In the future, try to notify both of us. It looks like I wasn't referring to an absolute path so it was having errors reading a file. Vacation9 19:33, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Hello Fox, I will be celebrating my birthday on 19 March. So, I would like to give you a treat. If you decide to "eat" the cookie, please reply by placing {{subst:munch}} on my talk page. I hope this cookie has made your day better. Cheers! Arctic Kangaroo 15:26, 17 March 2013 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
Hello! Fox Wilson,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! It's a Fox! (What did I break) 21:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
|
- Did I really just do that @_@ It's a Fox! (What did I break) 21:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
abl== duplicate check in delsort ==
Hi there, I was wondering if you could do some form of duplicate delsort tagging checks. I just stepped on Gene93k's toes and we both tagged an AFD within minutes with the same delsort. diff. A minor issue, but it could easily happen either like that with near simultaneous edit, or conversely in long AFDs you might find delsorting might be overlooked and duplicated days or weeks apart. Fantastic tool, glad to have it back, but can you add Australia to the default list, or make the list customisable? Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Probably should add the customization info to the documentation :) And I'll take a look at the issue, hadn't thought of this before. Thanks! It's a Fox! (What did I break) 23:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Element Mobile Edit
Hello,
You recently denied my request to edit Element Mobile's wiki page without siting any reason, can you explain why my request was denied and what I can do to get the changes posted? The Opening section on the page is outdated and is not supported by valid links. I am proposing that the following edit be implemented (below). Thank you! Akbemis (talk)
Element Mobile started in business on Jan. 8, 2011 when it moved customers from the former company network to its own, new mobile switching equipment. The first three months of this transition were marked by service outages and customer complaints. While most of the service issues were resolved in the first quarter of 2011, a number of customers filed complaints with the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection. Element Mobile and DATCP reached a $248,000 settlement on April 25, 2012 remediating all customer complaints. [1]
One of Element Mobile’s key purposes for being created was to ensure that the people and businesses of its Central Wisconsin service area would have access to leading mobile phone and data services. Since Element Mobile was formed, mobile services and options for customers in the market area have grown substantially. The number of Android-based smart phone choices has grown from one to several, high-speed data usage doubled; and the number of smart phones bought jumped from 600 to 7,000. In early 2012, Element Mobile customers reached milestones such as 500 million minutes used and one billion text messages sent. [2]
- I found that it was written in a slightly promotional tone. If you want, and when I get the chance, I can look it again and perhaps we can work something out. Also, if you're closely related to Element Mobile, you may wish to read WP:COI. Thanks for editing!
It's a Fox! (What did I break) 00:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- I would appreciate any help! I am open to editing what I wrote, my main concern is that the article is accurate. Let me know what you need me to do. I look forward to your response. Akbemis (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that I am working on removing the promotional language from the article I posted before, I will be posting the new version this week. I appreciate any help in the process of getting this page corrected. Thank you! Akbemis (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
- Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
- Featured content: What the ?
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Saw vandalism on http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/The_Big_Bang_Theory_(season_6), and had trouble logging on, so I could edit/reverse to an older version. Had to fire up a new browser. Spend a good 15 minutes, but was totally unable to find it again. Finally had enough sense to click View history, and found you had made the edit I was a bout to make Good job! RipRapRob (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks :) It's a Fox! (What did I break) 15:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
AFT5 re-enabled
Hey Fox Wilson :). Just a note that the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5 has now been re-enabled. Let us know on the talkpage if you spot any bugs. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
Element Mobile Edit Request
Hello,
We spoke a few weeks ago about some edits I proposed to the Element Mobile page, I rewrote the content and requested an edit on Element Mobile's talk page. I would appreciate any feedback you can give me on my changes or any help you can provide in getting this change approved.
Thank you --Akbemis (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you from Milkecolier: Manager of Tessa Dahl
For ceasing the repeated deletion of Tessa Dahl's page. How can one find out who did it - or the vandalism last year in which they called her a ""whore." It read "After attending Roedean and Downe House Schools she became a whore." The same person who tried to delete Tessa Dahl's page also wrote an incorrect and disrespectful remark on her Talk page. I am a new comer and do not know how to do anything about that or how I find out where they came from either. But all these actions are vandalism and we need to know who the obvious grudge holder is, as it is damaging and cruel.Milkecolier (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
Thanks, and have some pierogi!
Pierogi Award | |
Thanks for your support of my RfA. It didn't succeed this time, but that's no reason not to have some nice pierogi. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
Featured Portal Candidates
Please see User_talk:VoxelBot#Featured_Portal_Candidates_archiving_.3F.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 02:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
VoxelBot
VoxelBot's task four hasn't been running in over a month. Is it broken? Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 21:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- At the moment it's impractical to run the task due to technical issues. I generally run it manually, but I'll figure out a reasonable schedule for it. Thanks for letting me know. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 21:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 May 2013
- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
The Signpost: 13 May 2013
- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
The Signpost: 20 May 2013
- Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment
- WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome
- News and notes: Spanish Wikipedia leaps past one million articles
- In the media: Qworty incident continues
- Featured content: Up in the air
The Signpost: 27 May 2013
- News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions
- In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing
- Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates
- Featured content: Life of 2π
- Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Wikipedia; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Wikipedia than the English Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels
The Signpost: 05 June 2013
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- Featured content: A week of portraits
- Discussion report: Return of the Discussion report
- News and notes: "Cease and desist", World Trade Organization says to Wikivoyage; Could WikiLang be the next WMF project?
- In the media: China blocks secure version of Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Operation Normandy
- Technology report: Developers accused of making Toolserver fight 'pointless'
Complaint about the VoxelBot
Hey, there. The bot that you and Vacation9 are operating, VoxelBot, left a message for me on May 24 that an article I created, Martin Brody, "has been recently tagged with a notability notice and may be merged, redirected, or deleted." I followed the bot's instructions to find and insert some reliable sources into the article, but even once I did so, my hard work had all vanished and I was given no notifications that it had been deleted aside from the page turning into a redirect. If you could do something, I would be glad. --MatthewHoobin (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)User:MatthewHoobin
- Responded on my talk page. VoxelBot was doing its job, talk to User:Future Perfect at Sunrise who actually redirected the page. Vacation9 21:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 June 2013
- Featured content: Mixing Bowl Interchange
- In the media: VisualEditor will "change world history"
- Discussion report: VisualEditor, elections, bots, and more
- Traffic report: Who holds the throne?
- Arbitration report: Two cases suspended; proposed decision posted in Argentine History
- WikiProject report: Processing WikiProject Computing
A brownie for you!
For creating awesome WP:FWDS. I have been using it for sometime now and I just tweaked it to make WikiProject Banner tagging script just by modifying few lines. Thank you Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 19 June 2013
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week
- WikiProject report: The Volunteer State: WikiProject Tennessee
- News and notes: Swedish Wikipedia's millionth article leads to protests; WMF elections—where are all the voters?
- Featured content: Cheaper by the dozen
- Discussion report: Citations, non-free content, and a MediaWiki meeting
- Technology report: May engineering report published
- Arbitration report: The Farmbrough amendment request—automation and arbitration enforcement
The Signpost: 26 June 2013
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- In the media: Daily Dot on Commons and porn; Jimmy Wales accused of breaking Wikipedia rules in hunt for Snowden
- News and notes: Election results released
- Featured content: Wikipedia in black + Adam Cuerden
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fashion
- Arbitration report: Argentine History closed; two cases remain suspended
Elizabeth Grosz
Dear Fox
I am Elizabeth Grosz, the subject of the page that I tried to delete. I would really like to remove it and all traces of me from wikipedia if possible. Can you help?
Sincerely
Elizabeth
<e.grosz@duke.edu>
Delsort script
Thanks for your script. I have it installed in my commons.js and the drop-down menu is fine. However I want to add "Australia" to that menu. I have this in my script, but it does not show "Australia" in the drop-down menu. Indeed I can not see how it could work as the defineLink statements are in your script, However this is what your document appears to me to be saying how to do it.
importScript('User:Fox Wilson/delsort.js'); // Deletion sorting script WP:FWDS
defineLink("Australia");
What am I misunderstanding early in the morning? --Bduke (Discussion) 21:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- That should work. I'll look into it; in the meantime, I've added Australia to the list of defaults. Thanks for letting me know about this. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 23:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- It is not showing in the menu, all the others are there as in your script. However I can see it at the end of your script. Odd. --Bduke (Discussion) 08:08, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds like a caching problem. Last time this happened, I just had to wait a while. I'll look into that as well :) It's a Fox! (What did I break) 19:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Indeed. It is OK now. Thanks. --Bduke (Discussion) 10:35, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds like a caching problem. Last time this happened, I just had to wait a while. I'll look into that as well :) It's a Fox! (What did I break) 19:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 July 2013
- In the media: Jimmy Wales is not an Internet billionaire; a mass shooter's alleged Wikipedia editing
- Featured content: Queen of France
- WikiProject report: Puppies!
- News and notes: Wikipedia's medical collaborations gathering pace
- Discussion report: Snuggle, mainpage link to Wikinews, 3RR, and more
- Technology report: VisualEditor in midst of game-changing deployment series
- Traffic report: Yahoo! crushes the competition ... in Wikipedia views
- Arbitration report: Tea Party movement reopened, new AUSC appointments
The Signpost: 10 July 2013
- WikiProject report: Not Jimbo: WikiProject Wales
- Traffic report: Inflated view counts here, there, and everywhere
- Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?
- Featured content: The week of the birds
- Discussion report: Featured article process governance, signature templates, and more
IRC office hours for wiki-mentors and Snuggle users
Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-office connect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. --EpochFail(talk • work), Technical 13 (talk), TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Rights
Hello. I see that you have a couple of hundred edits less than me, have been around four months less than me, yet you have reviewer and rollback rights. I'm jealous. Where do I get them from?--Launchballer 14:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Additional user permissions can be requested at WP:RFPERM. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 14:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Square Enix
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation's new plans announced
- Featured content: Documents and sports
Voxelbot
Hi, don't know if you saw on the bot talk page, but looks like it hasn't run on the FAC archived/promoted stuff since 7 July, and there are quite a few FACs yet to be updated. Really appreciate your work so even if we can just get an idea of what's up and when it might be working, that'd be great. Tks/cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:03, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. I had an article promoted by Ian on July 14, no bot to add the star yet. Montanabw(talk) 22:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 July 2013
- In the media: Wikipedia flamewars
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion
- Discussion report: Partially disambiguated page names, page protection policy, and more
- Traffic report: Gleeless
- Featured content: Engineering and the arts
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens
The Signpost: 31 July 2013
- Recent research: Napoleon, Michael Jackson and Srebrenica across cultures, 90% of Wikipedia better than Britannica, WikiSym preview
- Traffic report: Bouncing Baby Brouhaha
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: Politics on the Turkish Wikipedia
- News and notes: Gearing up for Wikimania 2013
- Arbitration report: Race and politics case closes
- Featured content: Caterpillars, warblers, and frogs—oh my!
Voxelbot updating talk page for Featured List
Hello-
Sorry to bother you if the correct thing to do is just wait longer, however I am curious in regards to the status of List of Detroit Red Wings draft picks. Voxelbot archived the FLC nomination at 10:01 on 24 July and added the featured list star to the article two minutes later. However the talk page has not been updated with the {{ArticleHistory}} template. I would do it manually but the instructions specifically say not to. I've never been involved in the Featured List/Featured Article process before, so I don't know how long this usually takes.
Thank you for your time. Rejectwater (talk) 13:00, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not too sure about that, you'll have to talk to User:Vacation9, as he operates that part of the bot. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 15:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks. Rejectwater (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- You wouldn't happen to be aware of the status of User:Vacation9 on Wikipedia, would you? They did not respond to a note on their talk page and have not posted any contribution since July 9. Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 02:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure of his on-wiki status, however, I've seen him around in IRC, so I'll send him a ping. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 15:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- You wouldn't happen to be aware of the status of User:Vacation9 on Wikipedia, would you? They did not respond to a note on their talk page and have not posted any contribution since July 9. Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 02:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks. Rejectwater (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ian Rose (talk) 01:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Red team may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing2/witness_dzakovic.htm FAA Red Team leader [[Bogdan
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:23, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 August 2013
- Arbitration report: Fourteen editors proposed for ban in Tea Party movement case
- Traffic report: Greetings from the graveyard
- News and notes: Chapters Association self-destructs
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Freedom of Speech
- Featured content: Mysterious case of the grand duchess
- Discussion report: CheckUser and Oversighter candidates, and more
The Signpost: 14 August 2013
- News and notes: "Beautifully smooth" Wikimania with few hitches
- In the media: Chinese censorship
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the cities
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage, reliable sources, music bands, account creators, and OTRS
- WikiProject report: For the love of stamps
- Arbitration report: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case closes
Question regarding FWDS
Hey, Fox Wilson. So, I installed both your delsort script and the AFD close script, but after I installed your script, the buttons for the closing script just disappeared, and only your script still worked. Would you happen to know what causes this? Thanks, TCN7JM 12:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- I do not know, but I will take a look at it. Thanks for reporting this. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 02:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
STiki emergency
Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 21 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 28 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
Article Feedback Tool update
Hey Fox Wilson. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 September 2013
- News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up
- Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds
- Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt
- WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion
- Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible
Melting point ref for carbon
The end of the first paragraph of Carbon#Characteristics has the details along with several cites. I'm not sure which details are most significant or how to word a summary for them as relevant to the other article. DMacks (talk) 01:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- DMacks, I'll take a look at it if I get the time -- feel free to revert my edit if you feel it is appropriate. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 23:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 September 2013
- WikiProject report: 18,464 Good Articles on the wall
- Featured content: Hurricane Diane and Van Gogh
- Technology report: What can Wikidata do for Wikipedia?
- Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV
The Signpost: 25 September 2013
- Traffic report: Look on Walter's works
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: GOOOOOOAAAAAAALLLLLLL!!!!!
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the stage
NextWord
Hey,
What happened to this project we were supposed to be working on?
TheOriginalSoni (talk) 23:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- User:TheOriginalSoni, I've been incredibly busy with school recently, more than I'd like to be. It's still on my list of things to do -- I'll send you a ping on IRC (hopefully soon) when I'm free to work on the project. Sorry about that :\ It's a Fox! (What did I break) 00:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 October 2013
- Discussion report: References to individuals and groups, merging wikiprojects, portals on the Main page, and more
- News and notes: WMF signals new grantmaking priorities
- Featured content: Bobby, Ben, Roger and a fantasia
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes: After the war
- WikiProject report: U2 Too
The Signpost: 09 October 2013
- Traffic report: Shutdown shenanigans
- WikiProject report: Australian Roads
- Featured content: Under the sea
- News and notes: Extensive network of clandestine paid advocacy exposed
- In the media: College credit for editing Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute and Ebionites 3 cases continue; third arbitrator resigns
The Signpost: 16 October 2013
- News and notes: Vice on Wiki-PR's paid advocacy; Featured list elections begin
- Traffic report: Peaceful potpourri
- WikiProject report: Heraldry and Vexillology
- Featured content: That's a lot of pictures
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case closes
- Discussion report: Ada Lovelace Day, paid advocacy on Wikipedia, sidebar update, and more
The Signpost: 23 October 2013
- News and notes: Grantmaking season—rumblings in the German-language community
- Traffic report: Your average week ... and a fish
- Featured content: Your worst nightmare as a child is now featured on Wikipedia
- Discussion report: More discussion of paid advocacy, upcoming arbitrator elections, research hackathon, and more
- In the media: The decline of Wikipedia; Sue Gardner releases statement on Wiki-PR; Australian minister relies on Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Elements of the world
The Signpost: 30 October 2013
- Traffic report: 200 miles in 200 years
- In the media: Rand Paul plagiarizes Wikipedia?
- News and notes: Sex and drug tourism—Wikivoyage's soft underbelly?
- Featured content: Wrestling with featured content
- Recent research: User influence on site policies: Wikipedia vs. Facebook vs. Youtube
- WikiProject report: Special: Lessons from the dead and dying
Voxel Bot
Hi, Fox! Thank you for taking over the tasks done by GimmeBot on closing nomination pages from the Featured article process. I've just encountered an issue that ... I might not be able to explain well, but I'll try.
This is Dr Pda's articlehistory script, which is used to detect items that belong in articlehistory: User:Dr pda/articlehistory.js. It was the script that User:Maralia, User:Gimmetrow, User:Dr pda and I used when we initially built all of the articlehistories for every FA, and it has continued to be useful for finding missing oldids in articlehistory events.
I've just encountered some FAs whose articlehistory templates do not contain oldids from the date of promotion (sample), and when running the articlehistory script so I can add them, I'm finding that <something, don't know what> about your edit summaries when updating articlehistory for FAs is not being picked up by the script, meaning I have to manually locate the missing oldids to add them to the articlehistory template. I suspect it's related to keywords that the script searches for in the talk page history. If you could adjust your edit summaries to account for <whatever> the script uses, the script can continued to be used. I'm not sure if I'm explaining this well ... but appreciate any help you can give. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia, that part of the bot is maintained by Vacation9. I'll let him know about the issue, and we'll hopefully get it fixed soon. Thanks for letting us know. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 02:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- @Vacation9: I just looked at the script, and what Sandy's asking for could be accomplished with a simple change to the edit summary used by Voxelbot when adding articlehistory:
Updating Article history
Updating {{Article history}}
- Adding brackets would make Voxelbot's edits match the patterns used by the script to find articlehistory-relevant edits. Thanks. Maralia (talk) 04:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks all! (By the way, if Vacation knows for what time period the bot wasn't adding oldids on FA page closes, I could work back through the archives to add them). Whenever I see something awful in an FA (which is becoming more and more frequent), it's helpful to be able to click on the oldid to see if the bad stuff was in the promoted version. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- @Vacation9: I just looked at the script, and what Sandy's asking for could be accomplished with a simple change to the edit summary used by Voxelbot when adding articlehistory:
Another (less pressing) issue with the bot, which I think was identified quite early on but I thought had been fixed, is that it sometimes mixes up just who has closed a nomination. This is a recent example, where I actually archived the nom but Graham is 'credited' with doing so after the bot has done its thing. As I say, not as urgent as some other things but curious, and something I hope can be addressed when you guys get a chance. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:39, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 November 2013
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: Five years of work leads to 63-article featured topic
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Accessibility
- Arbitration report: Ebionites 3 case closed
- Discussion report: Sockpuppet investigations, VisualEditor, Wikidata's birthday, and more
The Signpost: 13 November 2013
- Traffic report: Google Doodlebugs bust the block
- Featured content: 1244 Chinese handscroll leads nine-strong picture contingent
- WikiProject report: The world of soap operas
- Discussion report: Commas, Draft namespace proposal, education updates, and more
The Signpost: 20 November 2013
- From the editor: The Signpost needs your help
- Featured content: Rockin' the featured pictures
- WikiProject report: Score! American football on Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Ill Winds
- Arbitration report: WMF opens the door for non-admin arbitrators
The Signpost: 04 December 2013
- Traffic report: Kennedy shot Who
- Recent research: Reciprocity and reputation motivate contributions to Wikipedia; indigenous knowledge and "cultural imperialism"; how PR people see Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Musical scores, diversity conference, Module:Convert, and more
- WikiProject report: Electronic Apple Pie
- Featured content: F*&!
The Signpost: 11 December 2013
- Traffic report: Deaths of Mandela, Walker top the list
- In the media: Edward Snowden a "hero"; German Wikipedia court ruling
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments—winners announced
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Wine
- Interview: Wikipedia's first Featured Article centurion
- Featured content: Viewer discretion advised
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.22 released
The Signpost: 18 December 2013
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: Tunisia on the French Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Hopper to the top
- Discussion report: Usernames, template data and documentation, Main page, and more
- News and notes: Nine new arbitrators announced
- Featured content: Triangulum, the most boring constellation in the universe
- Technology report: Introducing the GLAMWikiToolset
The Signpost: 25 December 2013
- Recent research: Cross-language editors, election predictions, vandalism experiments
- Featured content: Drunken birds and treasonous kings
- Discussion report: Draft namespace, VisualEditor meetings
- WikiProject report: More Great WikiProject Logos
- News and notes: IEG round 2 funding rewards diverse ambitions
- Technology report: OAuth: future of user designed tools
The Signpost: 01 January 2014
- Traffic report: A year stuck in traffic
- Arbitration report: Examining the Committee's year
- In the media: Does Wikipedia need a medical disclaimer?
- Book review: Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia
- News and notes: The year in review
- Discussion report: Article incubator, dates and fractions, medical disclaimer
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Fifth Edition
- Featured content: 2013—the trends
- Technology report: Looking back on 2013
The Signpost: 08 January 2014
- Public Domain Day: Why the year 2019 is so significant
- Traffic report: Tragedy and television
- Technology report: Gearing up for the Architecture Summit
- News and notes: WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
- WikiProject report: Jumping into the television universe
- Featured content: A portal to the wonderful world of technology
The Signpost: 15 January 2014
- News and notes: German chapter asks for "reworking" of Funds Dissemination Committee; should MP4 be allowed on Wikimedia sites?
- Technology report: Architecture Summit schedule published
- Traffic report: The Hours are Ours
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Sociology
The Signpost: 22 January 2014
- Book review: Missing Links and Secret Histories: A Selection of Wikipedia Entries from Across the Known Multiverse
- News and notes: Modification of WMF protection brought to Arbcom
- Featured content: Dr. Watson, I presume
- Special report: The few who write Wikipedia
- Technology report: Architecting the future of MediaWiki
- In the media: Wikipedia for robots; Wikipedia—a temperamental teenager
- Traffic report: No show for the Globes
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
- Traffic report: Six strikes out
- WikiProject report: Special report: Contesting contests
- News and notes: Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Wikipedia's actions
- Arbitration report: Kafziel case closed; Kww admonished by motion
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
- Traffic report: Six strikes out
- WikiProject report: Special report: Contesting contests
- News and notes: Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Wikipedia's actions
- Arbitration report: Kafziel case closed; Kww admonished by motion
A kitten for you!
I see you have not been editing for a while. The wiki-kitten misses you :) Cheers,
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Heh, thanks :) /me goes back to reverting vandalism It's a Fox! (What did I break) 17:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 February 2014
- Technology report: Left with no choice
- Featured content: Space selfie
- Traffic report: Sports Day
- WikiProject report: Game Time in Russia
The Signpost: 19 February 2014
- News and notes: Foundation takes aim at undisclosed paid editing; Greek Wikipedia editor faces down legal challenge
- Technology report: ULS Comeback
- WikiProject report: Countering Systemic Bias
- Featured content: Holotype
- Traffic report: Chilly Valentines
Talkback
Message added 20:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AddWittyNameHere (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 February 2014
- Featured content: Odin salutes you
- WikiProject report: Racking brains with neuroscience
- Special report: Diary of a protester: Wikimedian perishes in Ukrainian unrest
- Traffic report: Snow big deal
- Recent research: CSCW '14 retrospective; the impact of SOPA on deletionism
(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014
- Traffic report: Brinksmen on the brink
- Discussion report: Four paragraph lead, indefinitely blocked IPs, editor reviews broken?
- Featured content: Full speed ahead for the WikiCup
- WikiProject report: Article Rescue Squadron
The Signpost: 12 March 2014
- Traffic report: War and awards
- Featured content: Ukraine burns
- WikiProject report: Russian WikiProject Entomology
VoxelBot down
VoxelBot hasn't made a single edit in several hours. I suspect that it's down. K6ka (talk | contribs) 11:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like that's a problem left over from the Labs migration, I'll have it fixed in a bit. Thanks for reminding me :) It's a Fox! (What did I break) 01:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like you got it back up and it made two edits two days ago, but nothing since then. Mojoworker (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Strange. I've been getting job scheduling emails from Labs, so it's possible that it just doesn't need to edit. I'll look at it again... It's a Fox! (What did I break) 21:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Seems like it did the same thing - ran twice (at 00:00 UTC and then half an hour later) then didn't run again. That was about 17 hours ago. Strange indeed. Mojoworker (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Still down since you restarted it on 21 March 2014. Any idea why it starts up at 00:00 UTC and runs only twice (then and half an hour later at 00:30 UTC) and then quits? Mojoworker (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Seems like it did the same thing - ran twice (at 00:00 UTC and then half an hour later) then didn't run again. That was about 17 hours ago. Strange indeed. Mojoworker (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Strange. I've been getting job scheduling emails from Labs, so it's possible that it just doesn't need to edit. I'll look at it again... It's a Fox! (What did I break) 21:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like you got it back up and it made two edits two days ago, but nothing since then. Mojoworker (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 March 2014
- WikiProject report: We have history
- Featured content: Spot the bulldozer
- News and notes: Foundation-supported Wikipedian in residence faces scrutiny
- Traffic report: Into thin air
- Technology report: Wikimedia engineering report
The Signpost: 26 March 2014
- Comment: A foolish request
- Traffic report: Down to a simmer
- News and notes: Commons Picture of the Year—winners announced
- Featured content: Winter hath a beauty that is all his own
- Technology report: Why will Wikipedia look like the Signpost?
- WikiProject report: From the peak
The Signpost: 02 April 2014
- WikiProject report: Deutschland in English
- Special report: On the cusp of the Wikimedia Conference
- Featured content: April Fools
- Traffic report: Regressing to the mean
The Signpost: 09 April 2014
- News and notes: Round 2 of FDC funding open to public comments
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Law
- Special report: Community mourns passing of Adrianne Wadewitz
- Traffic report: Conquest of the Couch Potatoes
- Featured content: Snow heater and Ash sweep
The Signpost: 23 April 2014
- Special report: 2014 Wikimedia Conference—what is the impact?
- News and notes: Wikimedian passes away
- WikiProject_report: To the altar—Catholicism
- Wikimania: Winning bid announced for 2015
- Traffic report: Reflecting in Gethsemane
- Featured content: There was I, waiting at the church
The Signpost: 30 April 2014
- News and notes: WMF's draft annual plan turns indigestible as an FDC proposal
- Traffic report: Going to the Doggs
- Breaking: The Foundation's new executive director
- WikiProject report: Genetics
- Interview: Wikipedia in the Peabody Essex Museum
- Featured content: Browsing behaviours
- Recent research: Wikipedia predicts flu more accurately than Google
The Signpost: 07 May 2014
- Traffic report: TMZedia
- WikiCup: 2014 WikiCup enters round three
- In the media: Google and the flu; Adrianne
- WikiProject report: Singing with Eurovision
- Featured content: Wikipedia at the Rijksmuseum
The Signpost: 14 May 2014
- Investigative report: Hong Kong's Wikimania 2013—failure to produce financial statement raises questions of probity
- WikiProject report: Relaxing in Puerto Rico
- Featured content: On the rocks
- Traffic report: Eurovision, Google Doodles, Mothers, and 5 May
- Technology report: Technology report needs editor, Media Viewer offers a new look
The Signpost: 21 May 2014
- News and notes: "Crisis" over Wikimedia Germany's palace revolution
- Featured content: Staggering number of featured articles
- Traffic report: Doodles' dawn
Hi Vacation9. Your input is requested on this bot request to replace VoxelBot on {{vandalism information}}. Thanks. — Earwig talk 23:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2014
- News and notes: The English Wikipedia's second featured-article centurion; wiki inventor interviewed on video
- Featured content: Zombie fight in the saloon
- Traffic report: Get fitted for flipflops and floppy hats
- Recent research: Predicting which article you will edit next
The Signpost: 04 June 2014
- News and notes: Two new affiliate-selected trustees
- Featured content: Ye stately homes of England
- In the media: Reliable or not, doctors use Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Autumn in summer
The Signpost: 11 June 2014
- News and notes: PR agencies commit to ethical interactions with Wikipedia
- Traffic report: The week the wired went weird
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Moderator: William Beutler
- Special report: Questions raised over secret voting for WMF trustees
- Featured content: Politics, ships, art, and cyclones
The Signpost: 18 June 2014
- News and notes: With paid advocacy in its sights, the Wikimedia Foundation amends their terms of use
- Featured content: Worming our way to featured picture
- Special report: Wikimedia Bangladesh: a chapter's five-year journey
- Traffic report: You can't dethrone Thrones
- WikiProject report: Visiting the city
The Signpost: 25 June 2014
- News and notes: US National Archives enshrines Wikipedia in Open Government Plan
- Traffic report: Fake war, or real sport?
- Exclusive: "We need to be true to who we are": Foundation's new executive director speaks to the Signpost
- Discussion report: Media Viewer, old HTML tags
- Featured content: Showing our Wörth
- WikiProject report: The world where dreams come true
- Recent research: Power users and diversity in WikiProjects