User talk:Trainsskyscrapers

Welcome, Trainsskyscrapers!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Trainsskyscrapers! I'm Royal Autumn Crest, and I've been assigned as your mentor. Around 10% of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor randomly taken from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Royal Autumn Crest!

I look forward to working alongside you. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 21:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angie Beyince

Hey, just wanted to say that it's been fun working alongside you to get Angie a proper page lol. Can you add her name link to the info box relative section on Beyonce's page? 166.198.161.6 (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise! Thank you for all of your contributions. Just added Angie to the infobox relative sections on both Beyoncé and Solange's pages, as well as those bottom-page templates for Beyoncé and Solange. Have a great week! Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 03:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at her songwriting credits and I think you forgot to remove one of the unreleased songs, Fascination, from that section in the I Am Sasha Fierce row. It's already in the separate section you made specifically for unreleased songs. 166.198.161.70 (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! Just removed it from the IASF row. I initially thought that based on the writing team (namely Amanda Ghost/Ian Dench) and their extensive work with Beyonce around IASF/Cadillac Records that it would be easy to assume which album sessions it came from, but I could find no cited indication other than the entry on Genius. For all you know, it could have actually been written for Solange's "Sol-Angel and the Hadley St. Dreams", which was heavily produced by Jack Splash and released a few weeks before Beyonce's. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True. I wasn't sure if you left it there on purpose or not, so I didn't want to remove it without letting you know. By the way, I don't know if you saw my edit summary about Angie's age or not but I left one just in case anyone else tries to make it 1982 again. 166.198.161.70 (talk) 14:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How does Angie qualify as a music executive? She isn't commonly referred to by that title in the media. And why is Mathew listed as Uncle when he and Tina are no longer married? As far as I know in laws (and in this case former in laws) and step relatives are not supposed to be listed in the infobox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.194.204.46 (talk) 00:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are right about Mathew, and I will remove those shortly. As for a music executive? Definitely. From that article that was written around the surprise release of Self-Titled about Parkwood Entertainment (as well as the Harvard Business School Case), her team have the respective responsibilities (and budgets) of an executive at a major label, but simply don't have underlings who report to them. The structure and culture are different. 2604:3D09:A980:1952:A0F0:1CE4:31F9:2197 (talk) 01:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but I was once told by another editor that if the person was not commonly referred to as such and such in the reliable media sources, they couldn't be labeled that here on Wikipedia. I get that Angie had a particular job when she worked at Parkwood as mentioned 10 years ago but I'm not sure that is enough for her to be referred to that way here on Wikipedia. I'm going to ask another editor I trust. @Binksternet what do you think?

166.194.204.46 (talk) 02:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carter Lang has been accepted

Carter Lang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Just wanted to take this opportunity to say thank you.

It hasn't gone unnoticed that you have been creating songwriter/producer pages and adding links to relevant articles. Keep up the good work!

>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 10:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate it. It's been fun getting back into the swing of things on here.

Cheers! Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 21:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThankGod4Cody has been accepted

ThankGod4Cody, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Darryl Pearson (musician) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Darryl Pearson (musician). Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 22:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment! Enjoy your weekend. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darryl Pearson (musician) has been accepted

Darryl Pearson (musician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Trainsskyscrapers. Thank you for your work on Rasool Diaz. User:Losipov, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

More sources would be useful, but I think it's ok for now. Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Losipov}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Losipov (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Losipov: Thank you! I will continue to be on the lookout for additional sources to further expand the page. Enjoy the rest of your week. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 04:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for adding so much to the Drew Barrymore page!

GabbyTheDarkAlien (talk) 18:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GabbyTheDarkAlien: No problem! I hate seeing pages with potential get that AFD message before the creator gets a chance to fully flesh out their idea. So glad I could help. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3rd Avenue (US band) has been accepted

3rd Avenue (US band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of women

Hi there, Trainsskyscrapers, and thanks for all the biographies of people in music you have created in the short time you've been here. I see a significant number of them are about women. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might find it useful to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve coverage of women on Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Thank you for thinking of me. I will definitely keep that WikiProject membership in mind. Cheers! Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Floyd Bentley has been accepted

Floyd Bentley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Trainsskyscrapers!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Feli Ferraro has been accepted

Feli Ferraro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 14:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Trainsskyscrapers. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Clovermoss (expires 09:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 02:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Trial extended by 2 months (to May 26th). Thank you for volunteering! Please re-apply a week or so before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 03:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for John Barnett (whistleblower)

On 17 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Barnett (whistleblower), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cinderella additions

yoo tysm for rewording the Cinderella article, I appreciate it so much! <3 ModlordD (talk) 23:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ModlordD No problem at all! Glad I could contribute. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 23:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Trainsskyscrapers,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Trainsskyscrapers, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol \| September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! jlwoodwa (talk) 03:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jlwoodwa: Thank you for the heads-up. I have usually only filled in an edit summary when a change is controversial or requires additional justification on a high-traffic, high-edit page in the past, but I can definitely do that. Just changed my preferences. Enjoy your day!

Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 16:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better Me Than You

I noticed that you have created an entire article, Better Me Than You, without adding one source to support your content. May I suggest you use your sandbox to create and edit the article, and then copy this into the live article once completed. Thanks for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: Started work on it late last night, and came back with all of my sources bookmarked and ready to go. The article has been completed. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 21:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blank sections to Megan: Act II

Hey, @Trainsskyscrapers, and thanks for your contributions to the article! Just wanted to come and tell you that adding blank sections without information is not really needed because we can WP:WAIT until an editor comes and adds them. Critical reception needs reviews from sources which can take one day to one month to appear. Thanks, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 20:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cowboygilbert I only do this on brand new album articles (on album release night or the day after) where so many people rush to make edits at the same time that it makes it hard to complete the basics: writing credits, production credits, or samples in the tracklist section. In my experience, creating an empty section has moved the "group" editing focus towards needed expansion of the page (in new sections like critical reception, background, composition, or information about songs), while users who have started editing or creating existing sections like the tracklist can continue to edit them without experiencing editing conflicts every time they submit something.

Enjoy your weekend! I will keep this in mind moving forward. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 22:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]