User talk:Trainfan01
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:40, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Dude, just sign.
[edit]What's so hard about typing "~~~~" after your comments? You wouldn't have all these messages on your talk page if you would just sign (and on occasion, just date) your comments on talk pages. Watch, I'll do it now: dogman15 (talk) 03:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
PBSKIDS
[edit]Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
June 2010
[edit]Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Toy Story 3, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Peteypaws (talk) 02:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. In this edit to steam bus you added a {{When}} tag; however, I cannot work out what you needed clarified.
Could you explain further please? -- EdJogg (talk) 10:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- In the absence of any response, I have reverted your edit. EdJogg (talk) 07:07, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Toy Story 3, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tiganusi (talk) 00:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Toy Story 3. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. PoeticVerse (talk) 00:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
July 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Magic School Bus (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Mithrandir∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 01:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
HarbourLynx
[edit]You didn't file the AFD quite right. I have fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 14:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
QM2
[edit]In regards to this edit, you are the one who is wrong. The name ocean liner is not referring to the mere fact if a ship has made a transoceanic voyage. There are significant and notable differences in construction techniques between the ships you mentioned and QM2. To quote from Cruise ship and Ocean liner, Ocean liners are usually strongly built with a high freeboard to withstand rough seas and adverse conditions encountered in the open ocean, having large capacities for fuel, victuals, and other stores for consumption on long voyages. QM2 uses significantly more steel than would a typical cruise ship built to her size and regardless of what Cunard says, Queen Victoria is not an ocean liner in the pure definition used here. Please do not change this again, you will be reverted. -MBK004 04:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
You're wrong again.
[edit]First off the bat, I hope you are consistently signing your posts with four ~s these days. Anyway, in an edit summary, you said that this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGyl82Dg6yg ad was "fan-created". It is not. This is an actual Barbie commercial from the 1980s for Great Shape Barbie. Same goes for http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qo0bPJnPEm8 , which is a 1980s ad for Animal Lovin Barbie/Ken. These are both real commercials. The only reason your edits (removal of the YouTube links) are okay is because it is Wikipedia policy to not use YouTube videos as sources. Nonetheless, these ads are not "created by a fan user" as you claim. They are real. dogman15 (talk) 18:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
List of Toy Story characters
[edit]Please stop removing reliable sources from List of Toy Story characters, especially when they directly support the text. The article needs more sources, not less. Your removal has been reverted by two editors now. Again, please stop. Novaseminary (talk) 13:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
ABC-DEF-GHI (2nd nomination)
[edit]You didn't file it quite right; you're supposed to transclude the deletion page, not hardcode it into the log. Fixed this for you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Your roger rabbit edit
[edit]Hello. It has been established that we do not need to post victims names in the amusement park Incident articles, as the articles are about the incidents, not about the victims. Also, your edit duplicated info that already existed in the paragraph. Thx, tho. SpikeJones (talk) 03:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Kid Gravity
[edit]Guess what. YOU STILL DIDN'T FORMAT THE AFD RIGHT. HOW HARD IS IT TO FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS? Apparently that's too much for you to handle, seeing as you've been warned about 30 times about not signing posts, and you're STILL NOT DOING IT. Are you really that clueless?! Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:24, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Your signature
[edit]You signature only includes a link to your user page but that doesn't even exist. It makes contacting you very annoying. JDDJS (talk) 23:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. You can't just close an AFD like that. You're not an admin. The discussion didn't even go on for long enough. You are clearly acting out of personal opinion JDDJS (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Episode Guide Information for Franklin
[edit]The material you added to the page for Franklin (TV series) was copied directly from the guide for the program at TV.com, a guide maintained by myself and other members of the site. Material posted at TV.com is considered the copyright of TV.com and/or the respective contributors and is not licensed by Creative Commons. As such, I have removed all episode guide information you added to the page that originated from TV.com. You may write your own episode information from the program, or copy information from another free Wiki-type source, but material copied from TV.com is not allowed. Agent0042 (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Edits to PBS Kids article
[edit]Sorry, I wasn't trying to revert only your edits. I was trying to revert back past your edits to get rid of the vandalism done by 184.41.16.91. That person has been reverting the article back to a version from 3 years ago for the last several days. Sorry for making it look like I was saying you were the vandal. -Dwimble (talk) 04:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Arthur OR section
[edit]Okay. Maybe instead of removing all the faulty material, we can work together to improve the article by adding some more sources and removing some OR content. So first, what parts of the section would need sourcing?Angiex3-2 (talk) 08:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Definately the first sentence of the section (it has the [citation needed] tag). Most of the mentionings about the references to popular culture should also be sourced as well.trainfanp1 User talk:trainfan01 18:28, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
Pop Cultural References: All listed on TV.com, which is listed as a general external link. The site also has information on continuity, and meta-humor. I found a blog post on wired.com that can also help [1] Popularity w/ older fans: [2] Okay, bad source. Many articles posted before 2006 are pretty much gone or only available as archives if you pay, so this part will be tricky to find. You can help me out with this one, or we can just keep the [citation needed] tag or put an original research tag on that sentence, and just put the section back since the rest were already cited.. Here`s a good website you can dig around: http://www.angelfire.com/ma2/ecdc/ But like SNPP, we can only cite it selectively.Angiex3-2 (talk) 23:57, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well if you`re not opposed to this, I`ll just go ahead and bring the section back with the added links.Angiex3-2 (talk) 21:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mister Rogers' Neighborhood (series 1)
[edit]A tag has been placed on Mister Rogers' Neighborhood (series 1), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Angiex3-2 (talk) 07:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Status and Advice
[edit]As reviewing administrator, I have declined to do the requested deletion. The reasons given were not a criterion for deletion, and no other speedy criterion applied. You may make articles in any sequence you see fit. This is a wiki, and one editor may only advise another: we are all equal as editors. If one wishes to get people to work to the standards of a a particular WikiProject, it is necessary to persuade them. That said, if there is a customary way of dealing with these episodes, you will find it enormously easier to follow it, than to argue with others doing similar work. By following customary ways, you can concentrate on the actual editing. DGG ( talk ) 21:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Randy Newman's reference in Cars 2
[edit]I had removed the reference for Randy Newman composing the soundtrack of Cars 2 because nowhere in the reference does it say so. I thought of undoing it but, I wanted your opinion. Halemane (talk) 13:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I had been confused about that, because the ref had been up there for almost a year, but obviously I was wrong. Back in early December I deleted an unreferenced edit about Michael Giacchino replacing Newman. We'll have to wait and see if he is scoring the film (it is pretty likely). Feel free to revert it if you want. trainfan01 talk 6:29, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
Postcards From Buster
[edit]Are you basing your rewrites on the actual episodes or pre-written synopsis? Angiex3-2 (talk) 04:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Patially on the actual episodes, but mainly pre-written synopsis. (Mainly because there is no sign of it airing on many PBS stations at this moment, according to a number of TV schedules and the three season 3 episodes are not availabble on DVD.) trainfan01 talk 6:41, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
- "After playing a Wii game with Arthur, that is themed on Egypt" ???? Was that on the episode? Angiex3-2 (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- A user mentioned on the talk page that the game has the same make as a Wii. However, I am not sure about the Egypt theme because I have never seen that episode. According to a number of websites, the synopsis for that episode states "After playing a video game with Arthur, Buster becomes infatuated with Egypt". I will go and remove the part about "that is themed on Egypt" from the synopsis as I am unable to find anything about how he gets infatuated with Egypt from the video game (I had assumed that was what it would be). trainfan01 talk 18:45, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
- all rightie. thanks :p Angiex3-2 (talk) 02:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The article RollerCoaster Tycoon 4 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The whole article is based off a single forum post that simply asks what fans would like to see in a new game. This does not mean it is going to be developed. To base an article off this post is original research resulting in an article that lacks notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Themeparkgc Talk 07:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing references
[edit]Thanks for fixing broken URLs in Victoria Express references. Don't you wish online news sources would publish a good archive-able URL? — Brianhe (talk) 04:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. Also fixed some broken urls in Victoria - Courtenay train. trainfan01 talk 19:50, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Cars 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Ellis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Re: Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade
[edit]Just so you know, I appreciate you taking out all the rumored appearances that have no sources. The part about KAWS's "Companion" is actually mentioned on the Macy's site as this year's entry in the Blue Sky Gallery. So far, it's the only 2012 one I could find on the site yet. That's why I've put it back (but none of the other rumored ones). J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 15:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of children's films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monte Carlo (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
List of films considered the worst
[edit]Hello, this is The Shadow-Fighter. I would like to thank you for removing From Justin to Kelly, as it was originally on my list for films to take off that list. I am working hard to keep films that were not technically considered the worst ever off this list, and I would highly appreciate help from other users. My next consideration for removal is The Man Who Saved the World, as it actually garnered some positive reception, and has a "Fresh" rating on the tomatometer. Could you possibly back me up? The Shadow-Fighter (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Here are some reviews: [3] and [4] (both negative ones) and [5] and [6] (both positive ones). None of the negative ones say that it is the worst film ever, so it probably may not qualify for the list. trainfan01 talk 02:24, 26 February, 2013 (UTC)
Celal ile Ceren (Celal and Ceren), Heaven's Gate, Showgirls, Monster A-Go-Go, and An Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn
[edit]These are other films on the list that got negative reviews, but were not considered the worst. There is a discussion bar open on the talk page of List of films considered the worst, both for these films and The Man Who Saved the World. I have done some extensive researching and I have found none calling them "the worst movie(s) ever". Your thoughts? The Shadow-Fighter (talk) 01:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Celal ile Ceren seems probable as a quick search suggests [7] (nearly all "worst ever" statements are mainly from fansites), Heaven's Gate [8] looks more like it could qualify for the list, but only barely. Showgirls may not exactly qualify [9] (the most reliable source for it is the Empire Online one and even there, it is only ranked 49) and Monster A-Go-Go [10] looks probable for it to not be on the list as most "worst film ever" statements too come mostly from fansites. An Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn also may not qualify [11] since any statements of it being "the worst" are also mostly opinions. This can be continued on the aforementioned discussion bar on the talk page. trainfan01 talk 02:04, 2 March, 2013 (UTC)
Oh for crying out loud, Trainfan01! Enough of your stubborn editing on this page. Do you seriously need to have the phrase "worst film ever" spelled out for you once per entry for it to be valid by YOUR terms? You are not the one who decides what films are the worst or not, From Justin to Kelly and Howard the Duck were both on that list for YEARS before you barged in to change it up by your own terms. They were on there for a reason, so how about you knock it off? Those are among the most hated films in the mainstream whether they satisfy your terms or not, and Howard the Duck was especially infamous. You are not the sole judge here, so stop with your editing. You've hurt the quality of the whole page by doing so.WisdomSeer (talk) 06:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Sandy Hook article
[edit]Hi Train, I can see how the failing of the legislation merits mention, but I'm not sure how it belongs in the article about the shooting, even in the reactions section. What about Reaction to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting or the Gun politics article instead? We have enough problem with POV pushers and it just seems like we're thumbing our noses at the anti-gun crowd with this inclusion. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Trainfan01. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of Sesame Street video releases
[edit]The article List of Sesame Street video releases has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Large pile of unreferenced, WP:INDISCRIMINATE detail, with no indication of notability. Adds nothing of value to History of Sesame Street.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikishovel (talk) 06:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Trainfan01. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Trainfan01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Just so you know
[edit]You have been added to Missing Wikipedians. IMiss2010 (talk) 19:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)