User talk:TonyTheTiger/Archive 104
This is an archive of past discussions with User:TonyTheTiger. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 100 | ← | Archive 102 | Archive 103 | Archive 104 | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | → | Archive 110 |
Can I get a hand up?
Hi, See you authored this template I was trying to steal a technique from and you are still very active,...
- Can you lend me a hand?
... I know squat about css and the under templates just totally lost me. All I'm trying to do is have the includeonly/noinclude states show or not show the table as you can see in the wikicollapsible class in this diff. Note the Common.CSS files are not identical on the Wikibook. I've got a dozen or so sub-pages of like kind to use this trick on, so would really appreciate the secret! If you can help, I'd really enjoy getting unstuck!
Questions... talk back here so I'll see a alert banner. Thanks // FrankB 23:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Fabartus I am active, but I am not sure I understand your question.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm trying to get the html line in the above diff to work differently when the sub-page is viewed directly or included. In the second case, two different versions oriented pages will include the sub-page, and expanding the page link is properly working, meaning the table manifests as a link which more or less says click here to see table.
- However, clicking to see the table when editing the page is both annoying and counterproductive. Getting the lashed up table to manifest clean and clear is where the editor needs to focus (since things get ugly with citations sourcing clutter)—not on extra clicks so he can view the preview. Or so I've found out for me likings! [The benefits of taking a new look in the morning light... This did the key need... seeing the page automatically in edit mode. I merely had to move the <includeonly> over a bit.
- This still leaves the question as to how I might emulate the view, edit, history links (v e h) we see here in so many collapsible templates. Obviously parserfunctions are in play there, and full url formations similar to the guts of {{plain link}} or utility maintenance templates like the meta template Template:Lts(edit talk links history)...
- Okay, following that thought, seems to be a working fix-with the benefit of being the same page as my first diff, we've come full circle to a solution.
- Send me a bill for the psych consult, I appreciate the hand holding! Best regards // FrankB 16:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- I am sorry, I have a lot less time for WP. Can you check in at the WP:Help Desk.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
kira kazanstev
kira really does live in atlantic city soo i dont why you too it down. can you tell me why? no bad blood . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiragirl124 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Kiragirl124, My concerns are WP:OR, WP:RS, WP:V.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 09:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup 2015 March newsletter
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
- Cwmhiraeth (submissions) took Bumblebee, a level-4 vital article, to Good Article;
- AHeneen (submissions) worked-up the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 article, also to Good Article status;
- Rodw (submissions) developed an extremely timely article to Good Article, taking Magna Carta there some 800 years after it was first sealed;
- And last but not least, Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points) worked up a number of Featured Pictures during round 1, including the 1948 one Deutsche Mark (pictured right), receiving the maximum bonus due to the number of Wikis that the related article appears in.
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
revert on Broadway Building
Hi Tiger, I agree that not everyone know where Hollywood is, but that's exactly what the Hollywood article is for; not everyone knows where Los Angeles is, and that's what that article is for. We don't need maps showing a landmark up to the country level, that is overkill and pointless. Once you tell in the article that's where the building is (Hollywood, CA), they can go to it from the Hollywood link. Imagine the article on Eiffel tower showing the location on a map of the Paris district, then map of the whole city, then whole department, region, province, country, Western Europe, Europe, then the whole Earth... Sure this is an option, but is it smart to do that? And the Broadway building is nowhere as famous as the Eiffel tower, why would it deserve such detailed treatment? 50.184.12.231 (talk) 08:08, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- 50.184.12.231, could you log in with a normal user name. The Broadway Hollywood Building is the test for the changes made based on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Architecture#Template:Infobox_building_maps. Note that the English WP format was based on fr:Gare de Lille-Flandres, which includes the map for all of France. Also note that fr:Tour_Eiffel includes a map with its location in France.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 09:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Tiger, I agree that not everyone know where Hollywood is, but that's exactly what the Hollywood article is for; not everyone knows where Los Angeles is, and that's what that article is for. We don't need maps showing a landmark up to the country level, that is overkill and pointless. Once you tell in the article that's where the building is (Hollywood, CA), they can go to it from the Hollywood link. Imagine the article on the Eiffel Tower showing the location on a map of the Paris district it is in, then map of the whole city, then whole départment, region, province, country, Western Europe, Europe, then the whole Earth... Sure this is an option, but is it smart to do that? And the Broadway building is nowhere as famous as the Eiffel tower, so why would it deserve such extra treatment? I was accessing it from the mobile app version and all maps are shown. It's particularly annoying having to scroll through several pages of maps just to get to the text... Mistakefinder (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Mistakefinder It is not really extra treatment. It is just something that we will be providing the reader once we have all the maps created. I have a request in at Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Map workshop for one map and will probably spend time adding optional maps to many articles in the future. As I noted above there has been discussion at the Architecture project. The Eiffel Tower may end up with additional maps. See fr:Gare de Lille-Flandres.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Tiger, I agree that not everyone know where Hollywood is, but that's exactly what the Hollywood article is for; not everyone knows where Los Angeles is, and that's what that article is for. We don't need maps showing a landmark up to the country level, that is overkill and pointless. Once you tell in the article that's where the building is (Hollywood, CA), they can go to it from the Hollywood link. Imagine the article on the Eiffel Tower showing the location on a map of the Paris district it is in, then map of the whole city, then whole départment, region, province, country, Western Europe, Europe, then the whole Earth... Sure this is an option, but is it smart to do that? And the Broadway building is nowhere as famous as the Eiffel tower, so why would it deserve such extra treatment? I was accessing it from the mobile app version and all maps are shown. It's particularly annoying having to scroll through several pages of maps just to get to the text... Mistakefinder (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Ivy League student newspaper navbox, etc.
Tony, (1) Template:Ivy League student newspaper navbox and (2) Template:Ivy League student radio station navbox have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Big Ten Conference business school navbox, etc.
Tony, (1) Template:Big Ten Conference business school navbox, (2) Template:Big Ten Conference engineering school navbox, (3) Template:Big Ten Conference law school navbox, and (4) Template:Ivy League engineering school navbox have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the templates' entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Ivy League medical school navbox
Tony, Template:Ivy League medical school navbox has been nominated for deletion, together with the navboxes for Ivy League business and law schools. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:44, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:30, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2015
- From the editor: A sign of the times: the Signpost revamps its internal structure to make contributing easier
- Traffic report: Attack of the movies
- Arbitration report: Bradspeaks—impact, regrets, and advice; current cases hinge on sex, religion, and ... infoboxes
- Interview: Meet a paid editor
- Featured content: Ploughing fields and trading horses with Rosa Bonheur
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Taiko FAC
Hey Tony-- I'm looking for someone to do a spot check of sources in Taiko for the current FAC for the article. Is there any chance you can spare some time to review the sources on the article to make sure the claims in the article are accurately supported by the sources? Thanks, I, JethroBT drop me a line 20:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- I JethroBT, I have never (that I recall) done a source review. Not my baliwick.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:22, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
RfC mention
Please see Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations#Proposal. ResMar 01:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malcolm Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2015
- Special report: An advance look at the WMF's fundraising survey
- In the media: Gamergate; a Wiki hoax; Kanye West
- Traffic report: Wikipedia: handing knowledge to the world, one prank at a time
- Featured content: Here they come, the couple plighted –
- Op-ed: Why the Core Contest matters
DYK for Maggie Daley Park
On 13 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maggie Daley Park, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Chicago's Maggie Daley Park includes a quarter mile long ice skating ribbon (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maggie Daley Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Maggie Daley Park ice skating ribbon
On 13 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maggie Daley Park ice skating ribbon, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Chicago's Maggie Daley Park includes a quarter mile long ice skating ribbon (pictured)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon at the Univ. of Chicago!
Hey there! The Regenstein Library at the University of Chicago is hosting an edit-a-thon to celebrate Women's History Month on Saturday, March 28th from 10 AM to 4 PM. Coffee and lunch is provided for free, and we'll be focusing on building a few biographical and organizational articles. We'll also have full access to archival resources maintained by the Special Collections and Research Center. If you're interested in joining us, please RSVP at the event page here! Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by I JethroBT through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tony,
I was wondering if you could help out with sourcing and with copy-editing the lead of List of Metra stations. You are a phenomenal content creator over at WP:CHICAGO and wondered if you'd be able to lend some knowledge into this list, as I hope this can be promoted to FL status not long from now. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 23:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Eva Longoria
Template:Eva Longoria has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 16:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 18 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Jahlil Okafor page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2015
- From the editor: A salute to Pine
- Featured content: A woman who loved kings
- Traffic report: It's not cricket
.
Conference basketball season pages
Hey, I saw you have been actively editing a college basketball conference season page, so please see this discussion here so we can get a consensus of editors. While this discussion is specifically on the SEC page, it concerns all conferences' pages. Jhn31 (talk) 22:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Inconvenient Truth FAC
Hey Tony, do you mind doing a spot check on the sources in An Inconvenient Truth, as it is in contention for FAC. I feel it just needs a quick once over.--The lorax (talk) 03:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- The lorax, Am I on a source review list somewhere. I don't get involved in those, but people keep asking me to do them all of a sudden.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation adopts open-access research policy
- Featured content: A carnival of animals, a river of dung, a wasteland of uncles, and some people with attitude
- Special report: Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year 2014
- Traffic report: Oddly familiar
- Recent research: Most important people; respiratory reliability; academic attitudes
RE: Jalen Brunson image feedback
Hello there! I appreciate you coming to me for a response, it means a lot. First of all, you took excellent photos of Jalen Brunson. I can tell you are a very talented photographer. Anyway, I really like image #3 a lot. It is the brightest image of Jalen, and it is a great action shot of him. Until the McDonald's All-American Game, I would use #3 as your primary photo. Thanks again for asking for my feedback! --NJ Jurrjens (talk) 04:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Damon Lindelof
Template:Damon Lindelof has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Henry D. Thoreau and associates
Hi Tony! Paine Ellsworth has pointed out that essays are not italicized after I did an italics run, and I was wondering if you had a reason to italicize the Essay section of your template Henry David Thoreau? Or was this a mistake at the time? I had changed the page titles on all of them to italics. Thanks, italically yours, Randy Kryn 16:49 30 March, 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Say It Loud (I'm Black and I'm Proud) (James Brown song - sample).ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Say It Loud (I'm Black and I'm Proud) (James Brown song - sample).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)