User talk:Kiragirl124

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Teresa Scanlan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Teresa Scanlan was changed by Kiragirl124 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908885 on 2015-02-27T13:01:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Teresa Scanlan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Teresa Scanlan was changed by Kiragirl124 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940247 on 2015-03-04T16:49:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:TonyTheTiger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Katie Stam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 15:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kiragirl, you've been warned enough times now that adding unsourced information to biography articles is not allowed. It appears that you thought if you just stopped for a while and then added it back later no one would notice; that's not the case. Please stop, or you may find your account blocked from editing further.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kira Kazantsev

In order to avoid edit warring, it's important we continue our discussion here rather than on the article. First off, you can not simply put a link in your edit description and call that sourcing. You must put the source in the article. If you're unsure how to do that, you might want to brush up on your editing skills before you continue to edit articles. Also, on that website it says nothing about Kazantsev being a Roman Catholic. All it says is that she believes God sees all. I know this seems like she's saying she believes in God, but I'm not sure if just speaking about God like that is enough for a confirmation. Certain things like religion, political affiliation, and sexuality are taken very seriously on Wikipedia and need very direct and obvious sources to source them. As a person of Russian heritage (I was born in Latvia and am of Russian descent), I can tell you it's unlikely that Kazantsev is a Roman Catholic as the majority of Russians are either agnostic/atheist or Orthodox Christians. In my opinion, I think it's better for you to remove the Roman Catholic addition from the article and add it back when you've found a source where Kazantsev herself clearly says "I am a Roman Catholic". { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 13:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]