User talk:Tongolss

November 2016

Hello, I'm Clpo13. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Yuan dynasty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. clpo13_(talk) 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of content from Chinese wiki users who highlight the enslavement of various peoples of non-Chinese origin during the Mongol rule of China. In fact, this page should focus on the social environment of Han Chinese people during Mongolian rule. It appears to be based on Chinese nationalistic intent and skews the page incorrectly. Please enforce a truthful and balanced account of history. Thank you.

Tongolss, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tongolss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mongol invasion of China

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Mongol invasion of China without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Yuan dynasty

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Yuan dynasty without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:17, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that in this edit to Yuan dynasty, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The YUAN DYNASTY should remain within CHINESE HISTORY. Please do not include content about Korean slavery in this page.

Yuan dynasty

Hello. You have been asked repeatedly to discuss the large-scale changes you keep making to the Yuan dynasty page. You remove extensive passages of reliably sourced content without explanation. Your edits are reverted each time because you will not discuss your reasoning and seek consensus from other editors. This has become disruptive and your editing privileges could be jeopardized if you continue. Please discuss your concerns at the talk page of the article, Talk:Yuan dynasty. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 01:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove content about Korean slavery from a page regarding Chinese history under the Mongols. If anything, it should include history on Chinese sexual slavery under the Mongols. Thank you.

Again, please discuss this at the talk page of the article. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 01:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I made my comments. Please keep intact the removal of Chinese nationalistic content about harems and comments about Koreans, please.

You need to open a new discussion at the bottom of the page. You keep placing comments in random places on the page where they look like old discussions. Also, please learn to sign your comments by adding four tildes at the end of your posts (see instructions below edit box). Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 01:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laszlo Panaflex, there continue to be problematic texts focusing on foreign women in this Yuan Dynasty page.. trashing Koreans. Please be more vigilant.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tongolss/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

Not clear what point you are trying to get across. This certainly is not intended to be an article in itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tongolss/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:52, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yuan dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. No1lovesu (talk) 03:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yuan

Stop claiming my support for your removal of sourced content on this page, as you have done here and here. I do not support removing this content without a further discussion, and your only attempted explanation (here: Talk:Yuan_dynasty#Tongloss) is inadequate and frankly bigoted POV. If you continue to remove this content while claiming my support, I will be forced to seek redress at ANI. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 13:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yuan dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Titanium Wolf (talk) 01:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Yuan dynasty. Titanium Wolf (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Tongolss/sandbox

Hello, Tongolss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 21:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]