User talk:Tomnelson17

Oakland Raiders[edit]

Please don't add junk to Wikipedia like you did with Oakland Raiders. It is considered vandalism. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 14:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Budget[edit]

Your recent edit to Budget (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Résumé, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Test[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Oden 15:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for incivility (this edit). I don't even know what you were referring to, unless you mean my reverting your vandalism on Oakland Raiders. Please calm down during those 24 hours. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 15:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After reading your comments to other users who have been reverting your vandalism, your block has been increased to one week. Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:VANDAL while you are on break. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 15:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Tom[edit]

Tom I agree with what you said to that idiot who blocked you. I saw those revisions you made, and I thought you deserved a barnstar. As I should, I'm going to leave "the idiot" a warning, and if I have to...a FINAL WARNING(I'm not quite sure how many it will take though).Tedbrinks33 14:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tom, please stop being a dumbass. I've indefblocked your obvious sockpuppet Tedbrinks33. Your one week block on this account has been restarted (you are again blocked for one week from today). I have no faith that you'll be anything but an annoyance to Wikipedia, but we'll give you a chance anyway. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 15:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what is a sockpuppet?[edit]

I know how weird it looks when I keep popping up everywhere even when you keep blocking me somehow but I'm just curious on what a sockpuppet is? If you could let me know and since you'll probably block this computer I'll get back to you when I'm unblocked. I'm a new wikipedian around here and I'm just wondering if you could kind of show me the ropes. If you could just leave me some tips and I'd appreciate it. I was only joking around and was trying to impress you. Thanks-Tom

WP:SOCK. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 15:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Oz[edit]

Oz you are now my best friend. Someday I will buy this great organization and you can be my co-ruler. You are the greatest and together, we can save the world...one article at a time.-Tom

Tom...[edit]

Please stop bothering me, Tom. Thanks. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 14:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked for one month for personal attacks immediately after returning from a one-week ban for the same. I understand you couldn't care less about Wikipedia and are only having some jerk-fun, but I'm getting tired of you. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 15:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely for block evasion, personal attacks, vandalism, the whole shebang. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 17:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]