User talk:Tomica/Archive 21
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tomica. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Talkback
Message added 06:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Till 06:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I addressed those issues on the list. Just waiting for a response from the main commenter. Et3rnal 11:08, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Wikiproject Leona Lewis proposal
Hello, I have proposed the created of Wikiproject Leona Lewis at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Leona Lewis. Please would you cast a vote or raise any questions in a discussion. Thanks. AARON• TALK 14:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 October newsletter
The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to Cwmhiraeth (submissions), our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009), Sturmvogel 66 (2010) and Hurricanehink (2011). Our final standings were as follows:
- Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
- Sasata (submissions)
- Grapple X (submissions)
- Casliber (submissions)
- Muboshgu (submissions)
- Miyagawa (submissions)
- Ruby2010 (submissions)
- Dana Boomer (submissions)
Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.
- The featured article award goes to Grapple X (submissions), for four featured articles in the final round.
- The good article award also goes to Grapple X (submissions), for 19 good articles in the second round.
- The list award goes to Muboshgu (submissions), for three featured lists in the final round.
- The topic award goes to Grapple X (submissions), for three good topics (with around 40 articles) in round 4.
- The did you know award goes to Cwmhiraeth (submissions), for well over 100 DYKs in the final round.
- The news award goes to ThaddeusB (submissions), for 10 in the news items in round 3.
- The picture award goes to Grandiose (submissions), for two featured pictures in round 2.
- The reviewer award goes to both Ruby2010 (submissions) (14 reviews in round 1) and Grandiose (submissions) (14 reviews in round 3).
- Finally, for achieving an incredible bonus point total in the final round, and for bringing the top-importance article frog to featured status, a biostar has been awarded to Cwmhiraeth (submissions).
Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.
Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - November 2012
Your monthly ProjectEurovision newsletter has arrived. Click show to open. | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 10:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
It might be worth asking for page protection, the history is full of IP edits and reverts. AARON• TALK 21:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
"Diamonds"
Hi, US Billboard Hot 100 must have just updated. It showed 5 just a little bit ago!
Peace —Iknow23 (talk) 11:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Mmm okay.:) I knew it already that was 4, Billboard announced it yesterday, can't wait to be 1 :D ! — Tomíca(T2ME) 11:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yep! Billboard announces stuff before it shows up on their charts. Messes up wikipedia, HA. —Iknow23 (talk) 11:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
You there?
Get on MSN if you can. Let's talk! —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 19:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey
Was upstairs. Here now. Statυs (talk) 19:37, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 09:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sorry, forgot about this! Till 09:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Me too xD. Thanks ! — Tomíca(T2ME) 09:03, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Cup of tea
Till has given you a cup of tea, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Tea promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day ever so slightly better.
Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!
Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{subst:wikitea2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Till 10:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Although I find this as a total surprise, I am accepting it. Tbh, it was much, but it's not like I can't forget it. You should just show again as you were in the beginning. Cheers ! — Tomíca(T2ME) 10:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- I will admit, my attitude got the best of me over the past couple of months but it wouldn't have happened if you didn't go all WP:OWN on me when I tried to make good-faith edits. But anyways lets just leave this where it is & be on good terms again. Till 10:54, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- I still didn't think my edits were pure OWN. But, however, as you said, just leave it and focus on collaborating in future. — Tomíca(T2ME) 10:57, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- I will admit, my attitude got the best of me over the past couple of months but it wouldn't have happened if you didn't go all WP:OWN on me when I tried to make good-faith edits. But anyways lets just leave this where it is & be on good terms again. Till 10:54, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Although I find this as a total surprise, I am accepting it. Tbh, it was much, but it's not like I can't forget it. You should just show again as you were in the beginning. Cheers ! — Tomíca(T2ME) 10:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, if you would like to leave comments which concern you or would cast a vote in support or opposition based on your findings, I would much appreciate it. The list has garnered several good (and resolved) reviews, but no votes have been cast. Thanks. AARON• TALK 12:27, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
"Half of Me"
LIterally nowhere on iTunes does it say that "Half of Me" was written by Adele Adkins. There are purported screenshots that credit Adkins, but those can't be considered reliable by any means. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamZR (talk • contribs) 19:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Daylight (Maroon 5 song)
On 13 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Daylight (Maroon 5 song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Adam Markovitz of Entertainment Weekly called Maroon 5's 2012 single "Daylight" "a Coldplay-ish song"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daylight (Maroon 5 song). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Re: singlechart template and Billboard preannouncements. AGAIN
Hey, FYI...I'm sending this out to others...and put an instructional note at the top & bottom of
"Diamonds" Weekly charts section but nobody will probably see it :( Any thoughts?
Hello,
Please see the discussion at WT:Record charts at section #5, singlechart. Do not report chart updates (or any other material) without a VISIBLE source in the article as this violates verifiability. If listed ONLY in edit summary is UNACCEPTABLE, since readers cannot be expected to view an entire edit summary for potential 'hidden' sources.
If you go the bottom of the discussion, you will find my 'work-around' for this issue. Enjoy.
Thank You and Happy Editing.—Iknow23 (talk) 11:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
RE: Unapologetic
I have posted the article at WP:RPP. BTW, would the tour section of this article make for an article of its own? As it is, it seems enough for a separate article and too extraneous for an album article, at least needing a slight trim per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_guide#Touring. Dan56 (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Help editing In My City article
Hi, Please help me editing In My City article as it is creating lot of differences between me and User IndianBio. He is a good editor,somehow we are not understanding each other and are fighting like kids.pls help editing needed sections.Please help as I had observed that you had contributed much to featured article.You are a great Wikipedian.Pls help to edit and tone down unneeded info from the article.(Pks1142 (talk) 12:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
MSN
Come online. Lol. AARON• TALK 21:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- again lol AARON• TALK 11:55, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Inquiry
Hi. Since only you, and a few others, seem to know what the hell you're doing at Unapologetic, would you like to check this diff and see if anything else disruptive was done? Mass, dubious changes were made, and I only picked out a few unexplained removals and original research, but I'm not too familiar with the rest. Dan56 (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- As I can see you did a good job. Those IP's are mad! Please maintain it as you can. I see you started the Critical reception. It's good. :) ! — Tomíca(T2ME) 17:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- BTW, could I get a quick comment regarding possible fancruft here? Dude's getting me vexed over how an album's been received by critics, a reoccurring motif with these kinds of articles. Dan56 (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Diamonds GAN
Please stop reverting my GA nomination with no valid reason to do so. Anyone can nominate a GA, you do not own it. Thankyou. Till 23:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't mind if you help out in the GA process or fix issues which may get brought up. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, of course. Till 23:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm not seeing any policy reason at Wikipedia:Ga_nominations allowing you to revert another editor's nomination. NE Ent 23:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Really? So that means, any IP that didn't make any edit can come and nominate an article that some user has made 260 contributions on it? He is a significant contributor, but he has 10 times less edits than me. And btw, it's too early, there is more information coming that can be used in the article. He does that because he hates me and wants to ruin my reputation, of course I am not falling to this. Probably another ANI will resolve his problems. — Tomíca(T2ME) 23:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Why would something he nominated ruin your reputation? NE Ent 23:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey :) I honestly didn't even see your posts above mine, only saw now. Yeah WTF? I can't believe some people :/--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) "I can't believe some people" is a personal attack on Till, you do know that don't you? Very rude yourself. TBrandley 23:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- What he said actually? Till called me an "asshole", "pig", told me to "fuck myself" and nothing. I can't see anything vulgar in Nathan's comment. Dear Jesus. — Tomíca(T2ME) 23:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Bradley, your comment actually made me chuckle. Who the hell are you trying to fool? I've been here long enough to know my boundaries and certainly don't need unwarranted reminders from annoying stalkers. Tommy is 100% correct. Go speak with the plagiarizer.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Tomica, I understand Till has personally attacked you, but that's not an excuse, see WP:OTHERSTUFF, the personal attack is "I can't believe some people", I already said. And, Nathan, you're now personally attacking me, "annoying stalkers", ha. Your misunderstand of a personal attack, all, is making me laugh me head of. TBrandley 00:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, don't kid yourself. I know calling you what you are isn't civil, but after the crap you pulled, I couldn't care less. Go forth with your fruitless ANI or whatever. And no. "I can't believe some people" is in no way offensive or an attack.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 00:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Tomica, I understand Till has personally attacked you, but that's not an excuse, see WP:OTHERSTUFF, the personal attack is "I can't believe some people", I already said. And, Nathan, you're now personally attacking me, "annoying stalkers", ha. Your misunderstand of a personal attack, all, is making me laugh me head of. TBrandley 00:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Bradley, your comment actually made me chuckle. Who the hell are you trying to fool? I've been here long enough to know my boundaries and certainly don't need unwarranted reminders from annoying stalkers. Tommy is 100% correct. Go speak with the plagiarizer.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- What he said actually? Till called me an "asshole", "pig", told me to "fuck myself" and nothing. I can't see anything vulgar in Nathan's comment. Dear Jesus. — Tomíca(T2ME) 23:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Till 00:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
GAN
There is a discussion involving you at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Inappropriate quick-fail, you may wish to see it. TBrandley 00:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.