User talk:TomLee91

Hello, TomLee91. You have new messages at JLM003's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A kitten for you!

test

LewisHoward (talk) 14:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Lewis! LewisHoward. TomLee91 (talk) 12:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom

I have noticed you are doing the same topic as me! This means we are working together on Internet Behaviour Disorder. Hello :) Sarahmckinley4 (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sarah :) Yes we are, I look forward to working with you on this topic for PoIB! TomLee91 (talk) 21:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TomLee91, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi TomLee91! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Addiction Disorder - Griffiths Criteria Potential Expansion

Looking at the IAD page, the Griffiths Criteria section is at present a bit underwhelming and could do with expansion to improve and make the article a bit more informative for readers. If any of you find anything that could be of use for me editing this section or any ideas for potential exploration, it would be much appreciated. :) Sarah Mckinley, Amos Francis, JLM003, ClaraRoper. TomLee91 (talk) 12:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Progress so far can be seen at my sandbox: User:TomLee91/sandbox TomLee91 (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am debating keeping the Griffiths criteria in a numbered bullet list or changing them to subheadings under the Griffiths criteria heading. I will be directing this question to the Teahouse too. Any thoughts? Sarah Mckinley, Amos Francis, JLM003, ClaraRoper. TomLee91 (talk) 13:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Layout of criteria

Hi Tom! I would do it in subheadings with a detailed paragraph underneath (if you have found enough information to produce a paragraph) Sarahmckinley4 (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarahmckinley4, thanks for the help! I'm going to play around with the formatting in my sandbox and see which looks most appropriate within the Internet Addiction Disorder article. TomLee91 (talk) 19:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, TomLee91. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲‍水 14:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:24, Sunday, November 24, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, TomLee91. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 03:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]