User talk:ToTo

Updated

Etihad Fleet

Since when did Etihad have 20 orders for the Boeing 777-200LR aircraft. There is no refrence for these orders.User:Nighet Abbas. 12:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Airmauritanie logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Airmauritanie logo.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam+airlines+destinations

Hi- I tagged this with Template:Duplicate as it appears you have created the page elsewhere with the correct title. You can use this template if this happens. Thanks Thunderwing 17:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kostasvoutsas_xartopaixtra.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kostasvoutsas_xartopaixtra.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Airzimbabwe.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Airzimbabwe.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Airsenegal logo.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Airsenegal logo.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Airmandalay.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Airmandalay.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference for Vietnam Airlines fleet

I noticed that on May 12th, you edited the fleet information section on the Vietnam Airlines article. While you added a reference tag, you did so in a manner that didn't work correctly. Adding an empty "ref" tag with a name attribute is intended to point multiple citations on a single article to a single source, however there is no other citation to this source on this article, thus the source isn't displayed. Please see Wikipedia:Footnotes for details on how to use "ref" tags, and please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. -- Hawaiian717 20:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Air zimbabwe-logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Air zimbabwe-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 04:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Air Ivoire logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Air Ivoire logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Air zimbabwe-logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Air zimbabwe-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 18:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Angor logo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Angor logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LaoAirlinesLogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:LaoAirlinesLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)==Orphaned non-free image (Image:Logo Sichuan.PNG)== Thanks for uploading Image:Logo Sichuan.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 05:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Shandong logo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shandong logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 05:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Airmandaly logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Airmandaly logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Airguinee logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Airguinee logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Airbra logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Airbra logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cameroonairlines logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cameroonairlines logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Chinaunited logo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chinaunited logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Nationwide logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nationwide logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Kulula logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kulula logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Kulula logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kulula logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Naxos annasteiger.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Naxos annasteiger.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo airmalawi.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo airmalawi.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo airdolomiti.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo airdolomiti.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo CirrusAirlines.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo CirrusAirlines.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lam-logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lam-logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mango logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mango logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Palogo.GIF

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Palogo.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Orientthai logo.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Orientthai logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:LogoSonair en.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoSonair en.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo phuketair.PNG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo phuketair.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Lakis Gavalas

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lakis Gavalas, by SatyrTN (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lakis Gavalas seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lakis Gavalas, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo airdolomiti.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo airdolomiti.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Chinaunited logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Chinaunited logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Palogo.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Palogo.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo airmalawi.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo airmalawi.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:Zambian_logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Zambian_logo.PNG. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 08:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lam-logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Lam-logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jet Airways to SFO

Please stop deleting SFO from Jet Airways's destinations list. It has been confirmed as a destination by the airline to begin in February 2008. Also, Jet Airways has been listed on the SFO airport article with a source added. Thanks!!! Bucs2004 (talk) 05:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arabia - The best place to go on holiday!

Come to the best countrty in the universe on holiday. Call: 0871 226 2673 for more details and a quote fir your next and best holiday!

Woah! We're going to Arabia!

Woah! Back to Mohammid!

Woah! We're gonna have a Jihad!

Woah! In the Saudi Arabian Sea!

نة انش نة انشقالامقترحإ مقلات ظنة اانشاءر

Once upon a Jihad, a princess named Maham fell in love with Mohammed. It was really a beautiful story...

...until Mohammed realised that women were less important, and shoved her where she belongs - in a BURQA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChocolateLovely (talk • contribs) 11:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gabriel Emilio Hernández Ibarzábal

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gabriel Emilio Hernández Ibarzábal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic (talk) 12:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcelina Chissano

The article Marcelina Chissano has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Articles for deletion nomination of Gabriel Emilio Hernández Ibarzábal

I have nominated Gabriel Emilio Hernández Ibarzábal, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Emilio Hernández Ibarzábal. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ^Bongo_matic 23:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cameroonairlines logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cameroonairlines logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Anthonycarrol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Anthonycarrol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Belgravia (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Robert Portal

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Robert Portal has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0691928/bio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review GirthSummit _(blether) 14:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just to expand on this, while there wasn't much prose in the article, almost all of it was copied directly from IMDB. If there had been any viable sources I would have looked at reworking it myself, but aside from IMDB (UGC, unreliable) the only source was a Radio Times article that did not appear to mention him at all (it was quite a long piece with lots of adverts, but I searched for "Robert Portal", and just for "Portal", and drew a blank both times - let me know if I missed anything). So, I'd have been left with a BLP without any prose or sourcing - not ideal. If you want to pursue this, please write your own prose without copying from IMDB, and find reliable, independent secondary sources that cover the subject in significant depth. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 14:14, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Emily reid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Emily reid. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Emily Reid. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Emily Reid. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Schazjmd (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When you create an article and get the title wrong, the proper thing to do is move the article to the correct title, not to create a duplicate. Schazjmd (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stevee Davis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Stevee Davis, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Abishe (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stevee Davies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stevee Davies, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stevee Davies (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stevee Davies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stevee Davies, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anthonycarrol! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

James Fleet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chambers, Outlander, Ladykillers, Legit, Partners in Crime, Sean Foley, Cracker and Death in Paradise

Jack Shalloo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Fit and Bashment

Belgravia (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Chalmers

Naomi Frederick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard Thomas

Penny Layden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Libertine

Restaurant Andrew Fairlie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Andrew Fairlie

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greek Football League footballes

Hello.

Can you please create pages for Greek players that they now play in Football League (Greece) category and they don't have a wikipedia page yet? I will help to improve them if you create them. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRanemos1 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I have created several pages for Greek Footballers but the editor called DarkGlow keeps either deleting or moving my pages.

Can you help please?

Anthony Anthonycarrol (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Toby-Alexander Smith

Hello, Anthonycarrol

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DarkGlow and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Toby-Alexander Smith, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toby-Alexander Smith.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DarkGlow}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DarkGlow (talk) 13:17, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|DarkGlow}}.

Thank you for your message. I have added a couple of references to the page I created for Toby-Alexander Smith. In the meantime I will endeavor to add additional resources relating to the topic to prevent deletion.

Thanks, Anthony Carrol

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Parker (actor)

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Max Parker (actor) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 13:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DarkGlow

Thank you for reviewing the page I created for Max Bowden. I tentatively added three references from my research. There are obviously less references available for my topic as Max is a young actor.

I added far more to the article I created for Max Parker and am somewhat confused as to why the particular article was deleted.

I obviously am trying to learn and understand better as I am only a novice.

Thank you for all you help thus far, Anthony Carrol

Problematic editing

Hello! I've seen your edits on soap-related articles, and wanted to inform you of a few guidelines.

Per MOS:ITALICS, the names of all television series and films that actors appear in should be italicised.
Per WP:NACTOR, actors that have a few roles are not considered notable. Take Toby-Alexander Smith for example, he does not meet NACTOR.

Let me know if you have any questions. – DarkGlow (talk) 13:31, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DarkGlow: My apologies for not having italicised the names of all television series and films that actors appear in my articles.

I was advised by another user that it was not necessary to do so. I will comply hereon.Thanks, Anthony Carrol

I'm not sure who told you that, but you must italicise all works of art such as television series, films, albums, short films, theatre shows, etc etc. You also have to be careful with the amount of articles you create – only actors and actresses with multiple, notable roles meet WP:NACTOR. It's best to work on articles in your sandbox to get them perfect before publishing them. I am a page reviewer so I don't mind looking over your articles if you want me to. – DarkGlow (talk) 21:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gunnar DeYoung

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gunnar DeYoung for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 21:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily Reid

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Emily Reid for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 21:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jack Shalloo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bashment

Naomi Frederick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard Thomas

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Max Bowden

The article Max Bowden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:NACTOR. No clear attempts at developing a proper article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Soaper1234 - talk 11:58, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Bardoe

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jack Bardoe for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 14:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremy Neumark Jones

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jeremy Neumark Jones for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 14:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lorna McNee

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lorna McNee for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tori Allen-Martin

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tori Allen-Martin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Charly Clive

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Charly Clive for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom Hunt (chef)

Hello Anthonycarrol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tom Hunt (chef) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DarkGlow (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BLP tips

Hey, just a few tips, as I've noticed you mainly edit on BLP (biography of a living person) articles.

Do not use "best known" – "known" is the preferred phrase.
Do not add unsourced birth years or birthdays. Unless you can find a reliable source that verifies their age/birthday, avoid adding them.
Do not use The Sun, Daily Mail or The Mirror as a reference. They are considered unreliable; look at WP:THESUN for more info on that.
Add a short description that is under 40 characters, and don't add the "Pearbot5" thing, as you aren't Pearbot5.

With these little tips, your articles would be much better! Let me know if you have any questions :) – DarkGlow (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Sputnik: I'd keep an eye out on football related articles Anthony creates. He has little to no consideration for tips that editors like ourselves give him, and continues to make ill-conceived additions such as poor sources and unsourced information to BLPs. – DarkGlow (talk) 00:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Pigsonthewing. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from The Salisbury Poisonings. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nikos Somoglou

The article Nikos Somoglou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL, no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stevee Davies

Hello, ToTo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stevee Davies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roadkill (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicholas Rowe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emma Cunniffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endeavour.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Short description changes

Hello, long time no see – just a quick query: why are you changing a large number of short descriptions from "English actor/actress" to "British actor/actress"? – DarkGlow (✉) 22:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DarkGlow: Hello, I trust you are keeping well. There is a variation of short descriptions showing either "English actor/actress" and "British actor/actress". Having spoken to another Wiki user there suggestion is to rather use the term "British" as it refers to a British person without defining their race or religion. By using the term "English" comes across as the West Germanic language first spoken in early medieval England which eventually became the leading international language in use today - ToTo 18:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just seen this, apologies. The term "English" does not define race or religion, since a black Muslim can be English, as well as a Pakistani buddhist. This should have been discussed in a more public forum, since you're making large scale changes. – DarkGlow (✉) 14:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think your "Reply to" worked, since it did not notify me (hence the late reply) – just using "Re" works fine

– DarkGlow (✉) 14:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Pembrokeshire Murders, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sarah Jane and Roger Evans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Continued short description amendments

Hello – I see that you are still changing short descriptions without consensus, which is disruptive editing in itself. I wanted to ask you though: how come you freely use Welsh and Scottish but change any mention of "English" to "British"? The same logic for using Welsh and Scottish should be applied to English. If people are born in England, yes they are British, but they are specifically English. – DarkGlow • 19:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Brown (chef)

The article Tom Brown (chef) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Brown (chef) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Brown (chef) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Brown (chef) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chinaunited logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chinaunited logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LAM Mozambique Airlines (logo).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LAM Mozambique Airlines (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Vietnam Airlines destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Vietnam Airlines destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Vietnam Airlines destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 10:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]