User talk:Tmuzzatti

Machinima

It seems TKD is away, so I'll handle this. Please read the WikiProject Machinima Guidelines. If your series is the first ever "reality" machinima production, you will need to be able to cite that to an independent reliable source.

By the way, you might want to remove your email address from TKD's talk page, as address harvesting bots may get it. You can set up your email address in your profile so that people can send you email via Wikipedia without having to know your email address.--Drat (Talk) 08:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially, for your production to warrant an article, it must be the source of multiple non-trivial works by independent, reliable sources. Forums are right out, as are blogs (unless they are written by an authority). Professional websites and professional print media are much higher on the scale.--Drat (Talk) 07:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interview links

Instead of simply adding those interview links to the external links section of so many articles - which could make it appear that you have a conflict of interest - perhaps consider adding information gleaned from the interview and cite the interview, along with a link, in the references section, using the web citation template. Create a references section if there isn't one already. This would be much more useful.--Drat (Talk) 03:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jeff ma.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Tmuzzatti!
We thank you for uploading Image:Jeff ma.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ATDHDposter.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ATDHDposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Them From Space 19:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can discuss it on the TALK page but you are just going to remove it like you did for Jim Sturgess (I posted on the TALK page, someone added it, then you took it down). So I went to the Wikipedia:External links and I believe that ThinkTalk's content belongs in the external links section according to this, "Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons." Thinktalk has interviews that cannot be implemented into wikipedia and the interviews are neutral and accurate. Many of the pages where you removed interviews you decided to leave up other interviews, why are other interviews different from ours? If its just because I added them all in one day I appologize, I can space them out if it helps you sleep at night. Tmuzzatti (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't care about the SEO of the website. Thinktalk has interviews, these interviews relate directly to the article at hand. If you would take a look at the link you will find it as relevant as any other interview you would find in the external links section of an article. Tmuzzatti (talk) 21:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Them From Space 15:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid any confustion, the warning is for this edit, not your creation of the ThinkTalk article. Them From Space 15:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you keep harassing me about this, these links are relevant to the articles I am posting them to. For some of these people (Sean Fine is a great example) they have made great achievements and deserve to have their Thinktalk interview posted because in many cases Thinktalk is the only website with an interview. I am not going to post anymore external links, but you should know I have only good intentions in mind. Tmuzzatti (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ThinkTalk

The article ThinkTalk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Barely-sourced stub

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThinkTalk logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThinkTalk logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Manipulated-TTcapitol copy.jpg

The file File:Manipulated-TTcapitol copy.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for ThinkTalk. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]