User talk:TimeToFixThis

November 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bella Coola, British Columbia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Din oz1 (chat?) (he/him) 22:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Andy Beshear. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michael Adams (Kentucky politician). Materialscientist (talk) 05:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sheila Jackson Lee

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sheila Jackson Lee, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you revert or remove content from Wikipedia without sufficient and correct reason, as you did with this edit to Steve Garvey. Before reverting another editor’s edit, as you did to User:NathanBru, you should check the information thoroughly. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 15:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jayme Kennedy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jayme Kennedy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayme Kennedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 20:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She is a prominent figure in the Central Coast Region as well as the surrounding regions of Bella Coola. This article is relevant to the public arena, though more context and content need to be added to fill out her importance and history. Currently there is scandal and political infighting in the region and this article will prove to be an important space to record that history. TimeToFixThis (talk) 04:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, TimeToFixThis!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Falcon

The issue of the opposition leader's term has been discussed at length at Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Leader of the Opposition - beginning and end of term. Please argue your case there. Wellington Bay (talk) 02:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Justin Trudeau. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop changing all job titles to lowercase. This is an incorrect interpretation of MOS:JOBTITLES. —Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message. 13:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominees

Nominations for cabinet posts, ambassadors, and the like are submitted to Congress by POTUS. Until January 20, POTUS is Biden. Nominations for Noem, Hegseth, etc. will not be submitted before January 20. And for all we know, they won't be submitted at all. Please stop changing infoboxes to suggest nominations have been sent. Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert for post-1992 American politics

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 09:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]